imines recently developed by our group6 could be coupled
to an intramolecular Heck reaction to rapidly generate
functionalized 1-aminoindanes. Accordingly, o-iodobenzaldi-
mine 1a was subjected to our standard decarboxylative
allylation conditions (10 mol % of Pd(dba)2, dppf, DMF, 20
°C). We were gratified to observe the formation of the
cyclized product 3a in addition to the expected homoallylic
imine 2a in a 1:10 ratio and excellent combined yield
(Scheme 1). It is worth noting that 3a was obtained even
Table 1. Optimization Studies of One-Pot Reaction
isolated
isomer
entry
time (i:ii)
additive
none
TBAC
TBAI
TBAB
yield (%) ratio (3a:4a)
1
2
3
4
5 min:5 min
5 min:5 min
5 min:5 min
5 min:5 min
g99
72
73
1:1a
9.4:1
2.7:1
3.4:1
g20:1
Scheme 1. Two-Step Decarboxylative Allylation-Heck Cascade
65
5
6
7
8
9
5 min:5 min Ag2SO4
91
2 hb:10 min
2 hb:10 min
2 hb:10 min
5 min:5 min
5 min:5 min
AgNO3
AgOTf
AgO2CCF3
Tl2CO3
K2CO3
NR
NR
NR
72
16:1
2.6:1
10
70
a This represents an average ratio; specific ratios per run were highly
variable. b No conversion to homoallylic imine; subjection to Heck reaction
conditions after 2 h led to complete decomposition of 1a. c 2 equiv of K2CO3
instead of Et3N. NR ) no reaction. TBAC ) tetrabutylammonium chloride.
TBAI ) tetrabutylammonium iodide. TBAB ) tetrabutylammonium
bromide.
tributed to the production of an ephemeral palladium hydride
species that can isomerize the double bond to the more
substituted position via a series of addition-elimination
events.10 Remarkably, the resulting enimine 4a was stable
to standard flash chromatography through nonbuffered silica
gel. We investigated a variety of additives to enhance the
selectivity of the Heck cyclizations (Table 1).10 Tetraalky-
lammonium salts10f did not have an appreciable effect on
the reaction rate or alkene isomer ratios (entries 2-4).
Alternatively, silver(I) sulfate successfully inhibited isomer-
ization, leading to the exclusive formation of 3a in excellent
isolated yield (entry 5).10a,e Similarily, addition of Tl2CO3,
shown in entry 9, for the tandem reaction led to a signifi-
cantly improved isomer ratio.10c It is worth noting that other
silver(I) salts (entries 6-8) completely inhibited the initial
decarboxylative allylation; none of the other additives were
found to impact this transformation.11 Van Vranken et al.
observed that use of an insoluble base was crucial for
inhibiting alkene migration of R,ꢀ-unsaturated esters in their
tandem carbene insertion-Heck cyclization tactic.12 For our
reaction, however, we obtained a disappointing 2.6:1 ratio
of alkenes 3a:4a when triethylamine was replaced with
K2CO3 as base.
without the addition of exogenous base or heat. Subjection
of the resulting reaction mixture to typical Heck reaction
conditions7 effected complete conversion to the 3-methyl-
enyl-1-aminoindane 3a, whose structure was confirmed by
X-ray crystallographic analysis (see inset).
Encouraged by these results, we next sought optimal
conditions to effect the two-step process in one reaction
vessel. Initial attempts employed 10 mol % of Pd(dba)2 and
dppf as catalyst, but coelution of the dibenzylidene-acetone
ligand during chromatography compromised the purity of
the product. Tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0), how-
ever, provided rapid and effective decarboxylative allylation
and subsequent Heck cyclization without introducing intrac-
table purification issues. Furthermore, microwave irradiation
rapidly accelerated the Heck reaction,8 though in some cases
an additional isomerized product 4a was coisolated in
unpredictable ratios (Table 1).5a,9 This result may be at-
(6) Yeagley, A. A.; Chruma, J. J. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2879–2882.
(7) (a) Heck, R. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 1979, 12, 146–151. (b) Mizoroki,
T.; Mori, K.; Ozaki, A. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1971, 44, 581. (c) Beletskaya,
I. P.; Cheprakov, A. V. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 3009–3066. (d) Daves, G. D.;
Hallberg, A. Chem. ReV. 1989, 89, 1433–144.
(10) (a) Abelman, M. M.; Oh, T.; Overman, L. E. J. Org. Chem. 1987,
52, 4130–4133. (b) Wheatley, B. M. M.; Keay, B. A. J. Org. Chem. 2007,
72, 7253–7259. (c) Reetz, M. T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1972, 11, 129–
130. (d) Grigg, R.; Loganathan, V.; Santhakumar, V.; Sridharan, V.;
Teasdale, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 687–690. (e) Larock, R. C.; Gong,
W. H. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 2047–2050. (f) Jeffery, T. Synthesis 1987,
70–71.
(8) (a) Xie, X.; Lu, J.; Chen, B.; Han, J.; She, X.; Pan, X. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2004, 45, 809–811. (b) Declerckz, V.; Ribie`re, P.; Ne´dellec, Y.;
Allouchi, H.; Martinez, J.; Lamaty, F. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 201–208.
(c) Svennebring, A.; Garg, N.; Nilsson, P.; Hallberg, A.; Larhed, M. J.
Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 4720–4725. (d) Donets, P. A.; Van der Eycken, E. V.
Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3017–3020.
(11) We have observed a similar inhibition of the decarboxylative
allylation at rt with g10 mol % of other Lewis acids, e.g., LiCl, ZnCl2, or
Sc(OTf)3.
(9) Small amounts of the alkene disproportionation products 9 and 10
were also observed (1H NMR and LC/MS) in conjunction to 4a.
(12) Kudirka, R.; Van Vranken, D. L. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 3585–
3588.
(13) (a) Knowles, J. P.; Whiting, A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 31–
44. (b) Crisp, G. T. Chem. Soc. ReV. 1998, 27, 427–436.
5132
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 22, 2008