As part of our ongoing research program to develop novel
hydroxylamine based reagents,12 we recently reported the
copper-catalyzed N-arylation of hydroxylamines with aryl
iodides.13 Significant limitations to this process were that
aryl bromides did not react, and ortho-substitution of the
aryl iodide was not tolerated. Another drawback was the
relatively high catalyst (up to 10%) and ligand (50 mol %)
loadings and the use of 3 equiv of aryl iodide to bring about
effective coupling. Within this Letter we describe an efficient
and versatile method for the palladium-catalyzed coupling
of hydroxylamines with aryl bromides, iodides, and chlorides
that overcomes these problems, providing a considerably
more practical and useful method for the arylation of this
important functionality.
halides overcoming problematic ꢀ-hydride elimination. It has
subsequently been shown to be a general ligand for pal-
ladium-catalyzed amination reactions. Additionally, it is also
effective for aryl ether formation and Suzuki-Miyaura
reactions.19 This current work highlights some of the unique
potential of this readily accessible ligand in palladium-
catalyzed processes.
A selection of the results using the BippyPhos ligand is
shown in Figure 2. Although not all reactions were success-
In an initial screen to establish the ability of palladium to
promote the coupling of hydroxylamines we examined the
reaction between N-Boc-O-TBDMS hydroxylamine (1) and
bromobenzene (2) in array format under a standard set of
conditions (2.5 mol % Pd; 5 mol % ligand; 2 equiv base; 60
°C; 0.25 M). Variables examined included palladium source
(Pd(OAc)2, Pd(dba)2), base (Cs2CO3, NaOtBu, K3PO4),
solvent (dioxane, DMF, PhMe, DME), and a broad range of
ligands (PCy3, PPh3, dppe, dppb, BINAP, dppf, Q-Phos,14
DavePhos,15 JohnPhos,16 TrippyPhos,17 BippyPhos17). Ad-
ditionally, we also examined the palladium precatalyst
PEPPSI within the transformation.18 Remarkably, from this
extensive reaction screen, only the Singer ligand BippyPhos
(Figure 1) provided any of the desired coupling product 3.
Figure 2. Screening results varying solvents and bases. Reaction
conditions: Pd source (2.5 mol %); BippyPhos (5 mol %); 2 (1
equiv); base (2 equiv); 60 °C; 20 h; 0.25 M concentration
hydroxylamine, PhBr (1 equiv).
ful, it is clear this ligand promotes the coupling reaction with
a range of solvents, bases, and sources of palladium. The
precise reason for all other ligands examined failing within
the reaction is unclear at present, although the observation
may explain that despite extensive reports on the Buchwald-
Hartwig amination, examples of hydroxylamine couplings
have been limited to those of homoallyl hydroxylamines.4,5
With the solvent/base combination of cesium carbonate/
toluene emerging from this initial screen as the most effective
combination, we further optimized the process with regards
temperature (80 °C), equivalents of aryl bromide (1.2 equiv),
and concentration (0.5 M with respect to hydroxylamine)
before examining the scope of the coupling procedure (Table
1).
Pleasingly, the reaction conditions developed had a broad
substrate scope in both aryl halide and hydroxylamine
coupling partners. Standard oxygen protecting groups on the
hydroxylamine were well tolerated with tert-butyl and methyl
carbamates (entries 1-6; 78-91%); however, amides were
ineffective coupling partners (entry 7). Along with aryl
bromides (entries 1-6), aryl iodides (entry 8; 90%) and aryl
Figure 1. Singer ligand BippyPhos.
BippyPhos was developed as a nonproprietary ligand
within Pfizer for the coupling of primary amines with aryl
(11) (a) Porzelle, A.; Woodrow, M. D.; Tomkinson, N. C. O. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2008, 5135–5143. (b) Lobo, A. M.; Prabhakar, S. Pure Appl.
Chem. 1997, 69, 547–552.
(12) (a) Beshara, C. S.; Hall, A.; Jenkins, R. L.; Jones, K. L.; Jones,
T. C.; Killeen, N. M.; Taylor, P. H.; Thomas, S. P.; Tomkinson, N. C. O.
Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5729–5732. (b) Beshara, C. S.; Hall, A.; Jenkins, R. L.;
Jones, T. C.; Parry, R. T.; Thomas, S. P.; Tomkinson, N. C. O. Chem.
Commun. 2005, 1478–1480. (c) Hall, A.; Jones, K. L.; Jones, T. C.; Killeen,
N. M.; Porzig, R.; Taylor, P. H.; Yau, S. C.; Tomkinson, N. C. O. Synlett
2006, 3435–3438. (d) Hall, A.; Huguet, E. P.; Jones, K. L.; Jones, T. C.;
Killeen, N. M.; Yau, S. C.; Tomkinson, N. C. O. Synlett 2007, 293–297.
(e) Jones, T. C.; Tomkinson, N. C. O. Org. Synth. 2007, 233–241. (f) John,
O. R. S.; Killeen, N. M.; Knowles, D. A.; Yau, S. C.; Tomkinson, N. C. O.
Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4009–4012.
(13) Jones, K. L.; Porzelle, A.; Hall, A.; Woodrow, M. D.; Tomkinson,
N. C. O. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 797–800.
(14) Kataoka, N.; Shelby, Q.; Stambuli, J. P.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Org.
Chem. 2002, 67, 5553–5566.
(15) Old, D. W.; Wolfe, J. P.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 9722–9723.
(16) Wolfe, J. P.; Buchwald, S. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38,
2413–2416.
(18) Kantchev, E. A. B.; O’Brien, C. J.; Organ, M. G. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 2768–2813.
(17) (a) Singer, R. A.; Dore´, M.; Sieser, J. E.; Berliner, M. A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 3727–3731. (b) Singer, R. A; Caron, S.;
McDermott, R. E.; Arpin, P.; Do, N. M. Synthesis 2003, 1727–1731.
(19) Withbroe, G. J.; Singer, R. A.; Sieser, J. E. Org. Process Res. DeV.
2008, 12, 480–489.
234
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 1, 2009