10.1002/cbic.202000450
ChemBioChem
FULL PAPER
DNA/LNA-gapmer 2 and a native DNA-ON with the same sequence (5'-
AGATCTCTCTCTAGATT-3').
[1]
[2]
[3]
a) X. Shen, D. R. Corey, Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 1584-1600; b) C.
F. Bennett, Annu. Rev. Med. 2019, 70, 307-321.
a) B. A. Armitage, Nat. Chem. Biol. 2005, 1, 185-186; b) V. K. Sharma,
P. Rungta, A. K. Prasad, RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 16618-16631.
a) Y. Dong, D. J. Siegwart, D. G. Anderson, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2019,
144, 133-147; b) M. Caillaud, M. El Madani, L. Massaad-Massade, J.
Controlled Release 2020, 321, 616-628.
CD-spectroscopic analysis of duplex structures: Circular dichroism
(CD) spectra of duplexes containing the NAA/LNA-gapmer 1 were
recorded in phosphate buffer (10 mM NaH2PO4, pH 7.4, containing
100 mM NaCl) on
a Jasco 715 spectropolarimeter. The final
[4]
a) J. Temsamani, G. S. Pari, P. Guinot, Expert Opin Investig Drugs.
1997, 9, 1157-67; b) J. S. Parham, A. C. Goldberg, Expert Opin
Pharmacother. 2019, 2, 127-131; c) K. Goodkey, T. Aslesh, R.
Maruyama, T. Yokota, Methods Mol. Biol. 2018, 69-76; d) M. Rodrigues,
T. Yokota, Methods Mol. Biol. 2018, 31-55.
concentration of the duplex was 1 M. All measurements were performed
at 25 °C in a cuvette with a length of 1 cm and a wavelength range of
200-320 nm. Every sample was scanned 10 times with a scanning speed
of 200 nm/min, a bandwidth of 5 nm, response time of 2 s and a data
pitch of 0.5 nm. Prior to data analysis, a background correction was
performed. Spectra were obtained by plotting the mean residual ellipticity
against the recording wavelength . Reference spectra were recorded
using the same protocol and duplexes containing either the DNA/LNA-
[5]
P. S. Miller, J. Yano, E. Yano, C. Carroll, K. Jayaraman, P. O. P. Ts’o,
Biochemistry 1979, 18, 5134-5143.
[6]
[7]
F. Eckstein, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1985, 54, 367-402.
a) J. Lebreton, A. De Mesmaeker, A. Waldner, V. Fritsch, R. M. Wolf, S.
M. Freier, Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 6383-6386; b) A. De Mesmaeker,
A. Waldner, J. Lebreton, P. Hoffmann, V. Fritsch, R. M. Wolf, S. M.
Freier, Synlett 1993, 733-736; c) A. De Mesmaeker, A. Waldner, J.
Lebreton, P. Hoffmann, V. Fritsch, R. M. Wolf, S. M. Freier, Angew.
Chem. 1994, 106, 237-240; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1994, 33, 226-229;
d) C. Selvam, S. Thomas, J. Abbott, S. D. Kennedy, E. Rozners,
Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 2116-2118; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50,
2068-2070; e) P. Tanui, S. D. Kennedy, B. D. Lunstad, A. Haas, D.
Leake, E. Rozners, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 12, 1207-1210; f) D.
Mutisya, C. Selvam, B. D. Lunstad, P. S: Pallan, A. Haas, D. Leake, M.
Egli, E. Rozners, Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 6542-6551.
gapmer
2 or a native DNA-ON with the same sequence (5'-
AGATCTCTCTCTAGATT-3').
Stability assays in biological media: The stabilities of both gapmer ON
1 and 2 in biological media was studied using pooled human plasma and
whole cell lysate of the U937 cell line as described before.[19] As a
positive control for the degradation of ON in these media, a native DNA-
ON with the same sequence (5'-AGATCTCTCTCTAGATT-3') was used.
In contrast to the previously reported protocol,[19] incubation times for
both ON were increased to a total of 8 h. Samples were taken at the time
points shown in Figure 4 (vide supra).
[8]
[9]
a) Z. Huang, S. A. Benner, J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3996-4013; b) B.
Eschgfäller, J. G. Schmidt, M. König, S. A. Benner, Helv. Chim. Acta
2003, 86, 2959-2997.
RNase
H
assays: An RNA-ON with
a
sequence (5'-
AAUCUAGAGAGAGAUCU-3') complementary to the gapmer sequence
was radiolabelled at the 5'-end using -32P-ATP (Hartmann Analytics,
500 Ci). The phosphorylation reaction was catalysed by T4
polynucleotide kinase according to the manufacturer's protocol (kit for
DNA/RNA 5'-end labelling, Thermo Scientific). The resultant 5'-
radiolabelled RNA was purified on an illustra NAP-5 gravity flow column
(GE Healthcare) using water (Milli-Q) as eluent. The solvent was
evaporated under reduced pressure and the dry 5'-32P-labelled RNA was
redissolved in water to a final concentration of 10 M. The labelled RNA
(2.5 pmol) was then combined with the NAA/LNA-gapmer 1 (5 pmol),
diluted with 10 x Reaction Buffer (Thermo Scientific) to a total volume of
25 L and incubated at 37 °C for 15 min to allow formation of the hybrid
duplex. Subsequently, RNase H from E. coli MRE-600 cells (Thermo
Scientific, 1 L, 10 U) was added and the mixture was incubated at 37 °C.
Samples were taken at the time points shown in Figure 5 (vide supra)
and the reaction was quenched by addition of stop-mix (50 mM EDTA,
90% formamide, 5 mg bromophenol blue). The resultant final samples
were analysed on a urea-PAGE gel[19] and bands were visualised using a
Typhoon 9410 phosphoimager (GE Healthcare, Figure 5). DNA/LNA-
a) P. E. Nielsen, M. Egholm, R. H. Berg, O. Buchardt, Science 1991,
254, 1497-1500; b) Z. V. Zhilina, A. J. Ziemba, S. W. Ebbinghaus, Curr.
Top. Med. Chem. 2005, 5, 1119-1131.
[10] a) S. K. Singh, A. A. Koshkin, J. Wengel, P. Nielsen, Chem. Commun.
1998, 455-456; b) A. A. Koshkin, S. K. Singh, P. Nielsen, V. K.
Rajwanshi, R. Kumar, M. Meldgaard, C. E. Olsen, J. Wengel,
Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 3607-3630; c) J. S. Jepsen, M. D. Sörensen, J.
Wengel, Oligonucleotides 2004, 14, 130-146.
[11] a) N. Papargyri, M. Pontoppidan, M. R. Andersen, T. Koch, P. H.
Hagedorn, Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids. 2020, 19, 706-717; b) A.
Dieckmann, P. H. Hagedorn, Y. Burki, C. Brügmann, M. Berrera, M.
Ebeling, T. Singer, F. Schuler, Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2018, 10, 45-54.
[12] a) B. Schmidtgall, A. P. Spork, F. Wachowius, C. Höbartner, C. Ducho,
Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 13742-13745; b) B. Schmidtgall, C.
Höbartner, C. Ducho, Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 50-60.
[13] a) M. L. Jain, P. Y. Bruice, I. E. Szabó, T. C. Bruice, Chem. Rev. 2012,
112, 1284-1309; b) B. Schmidtgall, A. Kuepper, M. Meng, T. N.
Grossmann, C. Ducho, Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 1544-1553; c) M. Meng,
C. Ducho, Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2018, 14, 1293-1308.
gapmer
2 and a native DNA-ON with the same sequence (5'-
AGATCTCTCTCTAGATT-3') were used as positive controls.
Furthermore, two negative controls were included: (i) incubation under
the conditions described above, but lacking the gapmer strand, to
determine the influence of the activating strand; (ii) incubation under the
conditions described above, but lacking both the gapmer strand and
RNase H, to elucidate potential unspecific RNase activity of the RNase H
preparation.
[14] a) J. K. Strauss, C. Roberts, M. G. Nelson, C. Switzer, L. J. Maher III,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 9515-9520; b) T. P. Prakash, A. M.
Kawasaki, E. A. Lesnik, N. Sioufi, M. Manoharan, Tetrahedron 2003, 59,
7413-7422; c) M. Prhavc, T. P. Prakash, G. Minasov, P. D. Cook, M.
Egli, M. Manoharan, Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2017-2020; d) S. Milton, D.
Honcharenko, C. S. J. Rocha, P. M. D. Moreno, C. I. E. Smith, Roger
Strömberg, Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 4044-4047.
[15] a) G. Deglane, S. Abes, T. Michel, A. Laurent, M. Naval, C. Martinand-
Mari, P. Prevot, E. Vives, I. Robbins, I. Jr Barvik, B. Lebleu, F. Debart,
J.-J. Vasseur, Collection Symposium Series 2005, 7, 143-147; b) G.
Deglane, S. Abes, T. Michel, P. Prévot, E. Vives, F. Debrat, I. Barvik, B.
Lebleu, J.-J. Vasseur, ChemBioChem 2006, 7, 684-692.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, grant
DU 1095/2-1), the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie (FCI,
Sachkostenzuschuss) and the Studienstiftung des deutschen
Volkes (doctoral fellowship for B.S.) for financial support.
[16] R. L. Letsinger, C. N. Singman, G. Histand, M. Salunkhe, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1988, 110, 4470-4471.
[17] a) A. Blasko, R. O. Dempcy, E. E. Minyat, T. C. Bruice, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 7892-7899; b) D. A. Barawkar, T. C. Bruice, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 11047-11052; c) B. A. Linkletter, I. E. Szabo,
T. C. Bruice, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 3888-3896; d) H. Challa, T.
C. Bruice, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 2423-2427.
Keywords: oligonucleotides • antisense • backbone modification
• zwitterions • gapmers
9
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.