A R T I C L E S
Chambers et al.
ered to human cells and achieve intracellular concentrations
(g100 µM) that should allow in vivo hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI
studies.15
Herein, we systematically varied the interaction of a xenon
biosensor with a biomedically relevant protein, human carbonic
anhydrase (CA), in order to investigate whether small changes
in binding are detectable by 129Xe NMR. Cryptophane-A-based
xenon biosensors offer the possibility of tuning the frequency
of the bound 129Xe nucleus, through electronic and mechanical
perturbations of the cage environment. Water-soluble crypto-
phane-A derivatives have been shown to bind xenon with
micromolar dissociation constants under nearly physiological
conditions, such as in blood plasma.16 Functionalizing the
cryptophane with a biological recognition motif creates a
biosensor for the detection of specific proteins, such as matrix
metalloproteinases known to be secreted by various tumor
cells.17 Current strategies for constructing protein-targeted xenon
biosensors are (i) the use of a peptide to solubilize the large
(∼1 kD) nonpolar cryptophane7,8,18 or (ii) the incorporation of
cryptophanes into supramolecular dendrimers.19 While the use
of polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers affords narrow 129Xe
line widths, it also shields the cryptophane from solution and
renders the bound 129Xe relatively insensitive to protein binding.
In contrast, studies with peptido-biotin cryptophane biosensors
have shown that decreasing the linker length to the biotin ligand
increases the change in chemical shift but also broadens the
line width upon avidin binding.18 Attaching a peptide to the
chiral cryptophane creates diastereomers, which increases the
number of peaks in the 129Xe spectrum, and correspondingly
decreases the signal-to-noise ratio. Computational studies have
helped to assign the various NMR resonances to their respective
diastereomers.20 However, the tetrameric nature of avidin can
further complicate the 129Xe NMR spectrum.18
Figure 1. Crystal structure showing C8B-Xe-CAII interactions.29 The
Xe atom (green) is shown with a van der Waals diameter of 4.3 Å, the
Zn2+ ion is gray, the CAII backbone and surface are tan, and the MoMo
enantiomer of C8B is shown in black (carbon), red (oxygen), and blue
(nitrogen), surrounded by its van der Waals surface (dots). C8B binds in
the active site with the sulfonamidate anion coordinated to Zn2+
.
Numerous crystal structures of CA-inhibitor complexes are
available to guide biosensor development, and CAII in particular
has served as a successful model system for rational drug
design.21,25,26 CA is a monomeric protein, which reduces the
probability of biosensor-biosensor interactions that were
problematic with the tetrameric avidin target.18 Water-soluble
biosensors for CA were developed that avoid the appendage of
additional stereocenters to the cryptophane core. Use of the
arylsulfonamide ligand allows comparison of the biosensor-CA
interaction with other designed CA inhibitors. Solution-based
assays for CA can confirm active-site binding, and identify
protein-biosensor complexes suitable for crystallization.27,28 We
recently reported the crystal structure of CAII bound to a
benzenesulfonamide-linked-cryptophane (Figure 1).29
Experimental Procedures
Chemical Synthesis. Synthetic protocols and characterization
of all new compounds shown in Scheme 1 can be found in the
Supporting Information (Synthetic Methods and Figure S1).
To conjugate the sulfonamide linker to the tripropargyl crypto-
phane-A cage, 45-90 mg of 1 was dissolved in 2.0-4.0 mL dry
DMSO at rt with stirring. Sulfonamide linker 2, 3, or 4 (1.1 equiv)
was added. A 100 mM CuSO4 solution (0.25 equiv) was added,
followed by 2,6-lutidine (0.25 equiv), and 300 mM (+)-sodium-
L-ascorbate (0.75 equiv). The reaction was allowed to stir overnight
and then poured into 50 mL of H2O. This solution was extracted
with ethyl acetate and the combined organic layer was washed with
saturated NaCl solution, dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated.
The yellow oil recovered was purified by silica gel column
chromatography to give the pure product as a white solid.
In the current study, carbonic anhydrase was chosen as the
target enzyme due to its biomedical relevance and status as a
model system for understanding protein-ligand interactions.21
CA is involved in many physiological processes such as carbon
dioxide transport and pH homeostasis in tissue.22 However,
some CAs also appear to have detrimental effects on human
health: For example, CA I, II, and other isozymes were shown
to be present and probably involved in the formation of certain
tumors and polycystic kidney disease.23,24 Thus, the develop-
ment of isozyme-specific CA biosensors holds considerable
promise for cancer imaging.
Compound 6, 7, or 8 (27.2-54.2 mg) was dissolved in 2.0 mL
dry DMSO at rt with stirring. 5 (10 equiv) was added. A 100 mM
CuSO4 solution (0.25 equiv) was added, followed by 2,6-lutidine
(0.25 equiv), and 300 mM (+)-sodium-L-ascorbate (0.75 equiv).
The reaction was allowed to stir overnight and then poured into 30
mL of H2O. Compound 6, 7, or 8 was dissolved in dry DMSO at
rt with stirring. Solubilizing linker 5 was introduced. A 100 mM
CuSO4 solution (0.25 equiv) was added, followed by 2,6-lutidine
(0.75 equiv), and 300 mM (+)-sodium-L-ascorbate (0.25 equiv).
The reaction was allowed to stir overnight and then poured into
(15) Seward, G. K.; Wei, Q.; Dmochowski, I. J. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008,
19, 2129–2135.
(16) Hill, P. A.; Wei, Q.; Eckenhoff, R. G.; Dmochowski, I. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2007, 129, 9262–9263.
(17) Wei, Q.; Seward, G. K.; Hill, P. A.; Patton, B.; Dimitrov, I. E.; Kuzma,
N. N.; Dmochowski, I. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 13274–13283.
(18) Lowery, T. J.; Garcia, S.; Chavez, L.; Ruiz, E. J.; Wu, T.; Brotin, T.;
Dutasta, J. P.; King, D. S.; Schultz, P. G.; Pines, A.; Wemmer, D. E.
Chembiochem 2006, 7, 65–73.
(19) Mynar, J. L.; Lowery, T. J.; Wemmer, D. E.; Pines, A.; Frechet, J. M. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6334–6335.
(20) Ruiz, E. J.; Sears, D. N.; Pines, A.; Jameson, C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 16980–16988.
(21) Krishnamurthy, V. M.; Kaufman, G. K.; Urbach, A. R.; Gitlin, I.;
Gudiksen, K. L.; Weibel, D. B.; Whitesides, G. M. Chem. ReV. 2008,
108, 946–1051.
(25) Greer, J.; Erickson, J. W.; Baldwin, J. J.; Varney, M. D. J. Med. Chem.
1994, 37, 1035–1054.
(26) Supuran, C. T. Nat. ReV. Drug DiscoVery 2008, 7, 168–181.
(27) Chen, R. F.; Kernohan, J. C. J. Biol. Chem. 1967, 242, 5813–5823.
(28) Nair, S. K.; Elbaum, D.; Christianson, D. W. J. Biol. Chem. 1996,
271, 1003–1007.
(22) Supuran, C. T.; Scozzafava, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 4336–
4350.
(23) Pastorekova, S.; Parkkila, S.; Zavada, J. AdV. Clin. Chem. 2006, 42,
167–216.
(29) Aaron, J. A.; Chambers, J. M.; Jude, K. M.; Di Costanzo, L.;
Dmochowski, I. J.; Christianson, D. W J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
6942–6943.
(24) Kaneta, S.; Ishizuki, S.; Kasahara, M.; Nagao, S.; Takahashi, H. Exper.
Anim. 1999, 48, 161–169.
9
564 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 2, 2009