Chemistry Letters 2001
813
The reaction products were the heterodimer and two
homodimers. The heterodimer selectivity exceeded 80% and
nearly 100% selectivity was achieved for the system of vinyl-
ferrocene and vinylnaphthalene. No side-reaction products and
oligomers were detected. The homodimer of vinylarene
(Homo-2) was formed in selectivity more than that of vinylfer-
rocene (Homo-1). Although we could not get satisfactory het-
erodimer yields, higher yields will be achieved by investigating
more suitable reaction conditions, e.g., reaction temperature,
removal of ethylene formed, etc.
4
5
6
J. T. Patton, J. M. Boncella, and K. B. Wagener,
Macromolecules, 25, 3862(1992).
J. T. Anhaus, V. C. Gibson, W. Clegg, and S. P.
Collimgwood, Organometallics, 12, 1780(1993).
G. C. Bazan, E. Khosravi, R. R. Schrock, W. J. Feast, V. C.
Gibson, M. B. O'Regan, J. K. Thomas, and W. M. Davis, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 112, 8378(1990).
R. H. Grubbs and S. Chang, Tetrahedron, 54, 4413(1998).
W. Ast and G. Rheinwald, Rec. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas, 96,
M127(1977).
7
8
The geometry of the double bond of heterodimers was
determined by 1H NMR and 100% trans isomer was found. An
ORTEP diagram of 1-ferrocenyl-2-(2-naphthyl)ethylene is
shown in Figure 2. The geometry of the double bond is trans
isomer. Naphthalene ring and cyclopentadiene ring are on the
same plane that suggests the delocalization of π electrons.
9
J-L. Couturier, K. Tanaka, M. Leconte, J-M. Basset, and J.
Ollivier, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 32, 112(1993).
10 M. D. E. Forbes, J. T. Patton, T. L. Myers, H. D. Maynard,
D. W. Smith, G. R. Schulz, and K. B. Wagener, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 114, 10978(1992).
11 J. C. Marmo and K. B. Wagener, Am. Chem. Soc., Polymer
Prepr., 35(1), 317(1994).
12 K. B. Wagener and J. T. Patton, Macromolecules, 26,
249(1993).
13 T. Kawai, K. Shiga, T. Suzuki, and T. Iyoda, J. Mol. Catl.,
140, 287(1999).
14 B. Marciniec and M. Lewandowski, J. Inorg. Org.
Polymers, 5, 115(1995).
15 R. Baker and M. J. Crimmin, Tetrahedron Lett., 441(1977).
16 S. BouzBouz and Jonine Cossy, Org. Lett., 3(10),
1451(2001).
17 A. B. Smith, III, C. M. Adams, and S. A. Kozmin, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 123, 990(2001).
18 W. E. Crowe and Z. J. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 115,
10998(1993). W. E. Crowe and D. R. Goldberg, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 117, 5162(1995).
19 S. Warwel and W. Winkelmuller, J. Mol. Catal, 28,
247(1985).
20 R. Apronk and J. C. Mol, Appl. Catal., 70, 295(1991).
21 T. Kawai, N. Maruoka, M. Goke, and T. Ishikawa, J. Mol.
Catal., 49, 261(1989).
Several explanations for the selective dimer formation have
been made.16–18 Crowe et al. reported that the reaction of stable
benzylidene carbene and terminal olefin with greater basicity is
key to the reaction.18 Since two olefins are aromatic com-
pounds in our systems, similar amounts of both the correspon-
ding carbenes will be formed. The yield curve of homodimer in
self-metathesis of vinylarene as a function of reaction time was
similar to that of heterodimer in vinylarene and vinylferrocene
system. This suggested that both reactions occurred at similar
reaction rates. Thus, selective heterodimer formation may be
caused by: (i) selective reaction between ferrocenylidene car-
bene and vinylarene enhanced by the smaller size of the vinyl-
arene, and (ii) selective reaction between arenilidene carbene
and vinylferrocene, enhanced by the greater basicity of the
vinylferrocene.
22 T. Kawai, H. Goto, Y. Yamazaki, and T. Ishikawa, J. Mol.
Catal., 46, 157(1988).
23 K. B. Wagener, J. M. Boncella, J. G. Nel, R. P. Duttweiler,
and M. A. Hillmyer, Makromol. Chem., 191, 365(1990).
24 H. Tokuhisa, M. Zhao, L. A. Baker, V. T. Phan, D. L.
Dermody, M. E. Garcia, R. F. Peez, R. M. Crooks, and T.
M. Mayer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120, 4492(1980).
25 K-M. Chi, J. C. Calabrese, W. M. Reiff, and J. S. Miller,
Organometallics, 10, 688(1991).
In conclusion, we succeeded for the first time to get a
series of interesting π-conjugated molecules, 1-aryl-2-ferro-
cenylethylene selectively by cross-metathesis in the presence of
a Schrock catalyst. A study of the mechanism of high het-
erodimer selectivity is currently in progress.
26 R. T. Hembre, J. S. McQueen, and V. W. Day, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 118, 798(1996).
27 J. Arekion, M. Delmas, and A. Gaset, Biomass, 3,
59(1983).
28 J. W. Van Reijiendam, G. H. Heeres, and M. J. Janssen,
Tetrahedron, Makromol. Chem, 26, 1291(1970).
29 C. G. Overberger, A. Wartman, and J. C. Salamone, Org.
Prep. Proced. Int., 1(2), 117(1969).
This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Science
Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and
Culture, Japan (10650773).
Reference and Notes
1
2
3
K. J. Ivin and J. C. Mol, “Olefin Metathesis and Metathesis
Polymerization”, Academic Press, London 1997.
P. Schwab, R. H. Grubbs, and J. W. Ziller, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 118, 100(1996).
R. R. Schrock, J. S. Murdzek, G. C. Bazan, J. Robbins, M.
Dimare, and M. O’Regan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112,
3875(1990).
30 The crystal data of 1-ferrocenyl-2-(2-naphthyl)ethylene are
as follows; C22H18Fe, fw = 338.23 Monoclinic, Space
Group P21/c(# 14), a = 13.377(2), b = 9.9889(10), c =
12.111(1) Å, β = 91.762°, Dcalc = 1.39 g cm–3, V =
1617.6(3) Å3, Z = 4, R = 0.046, Rw = 0.036 for 2514 reflec-
tion with I > 3σ(I).