T.S. Lobana et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 10 (2007) 1307–1310
1309
in [(NO3)Ag(l-P,P-dppm)2Ag(NO3)] [1]. Neutral acetophe-
none thiosemicarbazone ligand bridges across Ag(l-
P,P)2Ag core via its sulfur atom, with Ag–S bond distance
of Haptsc, and dppm ligands (d 7.00–7.69 ppm). Methyl pro-
tons of Haptsc ligand show a single signal at d 2.22 ppm.
Methylene protons of dppm ligands appear as a pair of dou-
blets at d 3.21, 3.60 ppm. Further, the 31P NMR spectrum of
1 shows two signals at d, ꢀ106.2 ppm, and d, ꢀ109.7 ppm
with coordination shifts (dcomplex ꢀ dligand) of 24.01 and
20.5 ppm, respectively, supporting the presence of two
non-equivalent phosphorous atoms in the complex.
˚
of 2.6282(18), 2.5971(18) A. These Ag–S bond distances are
˚
longer than 2.573(1)
A
in [Ag(pymtH)(PPh3)2]NO3
(pymtH = pyrimidine-2-thione) [12]. The nitrate is coordi-
nated to silver atom in 1 via one of its oxygen atoms with
˚
a bond distance of 2.462(5) A, comparable with Ag–O dis-
˚
tance of 2.416(5) A, but shorter than second Ag–O distance
In conclusion, complex 1 reveals a new coordination
core {Ag2(l-P,P)2(l-SR)} in metal-thiosemicarbazone
chemistry. In literature, modes close to 1 are shown by
heterocyclic thioamides with dppm as a coligand, as
in [Rh2(CO)2(l-S–L)(l-P,P-dppm)2]Cl Æ CH2CL2 (L = 1,3-
˚
of 2.689(6) A in [(NO3)Ag(l-P,P-dppm)2Ag(NO3)] [1]. It
may be noted that bridging of Ag(l-P,P-dppm)2Ag core
by sulfur atom of Haptsc has brought Ag–Ag contact close
˚
to 2.9939(7) A, less than twice the sum of radius of silver(I),
(3.4 A) [13].
thiazolidine-2-thione),
[Cu2(l-S–L)2(l-P,P-dppm)(g1-P-
(L = 6-tertbutyl-dimethylsilylpyridine-2-thione)
˚
The imino hydrogen (–N2H) is engaged in strong intra-
dppm)]
[14–16].
molecular hydrogen bonding with the coordinated oxygen
2
˚
atom (–N Hꢁ ꢁ ꢁONO2, 2.51 A) as well as with the non-coor-
Compound 1: Mp 190–192 °C, yield: 0.050 g, 52%. C, H,
N, analysis for C59H55Ag2N5O6P4S: C, 54.38; H, 4.22; N,
5.38. Found: C, 54.28; H, 4.16; N, 5.13. Main IR peaks
(KBr, cmꢀ1): m(N–H), 3342 m (–NH2) 3165m (–NH);
d(NH2) + m(C@N) + m(C–C), 1541s, 1483s; m(C@S) + m(C–
N), 1024s, 999s, 833s (thioamide moiety); 1095 m(P–CPh).
1H NMR data (d, ppm; CDCl3), 10.53 (s, N2H), 8.75 (sb,
–N1H2), 7.00–7.69 (m, Ph + –N1H2), 3.21, 3.60 (d, –CH2),
2.22 (s, CH3). 31P NMR data (d, ppm, CDCl3), ꢀ106.2,
ꢀ109.7 ppm, Dd(dcomplex ꢀ dligand) = 24.01, 20.5 ppm (31P
NMR spectra were recorded by taking TMP {(MeO)3P}
as external reference taken at zero position).
2
˚
dinated oxygen atom (–N Hꢁ ꢁ ꢁONO2, 2.14 A) of the
bonded nitrate group (Fig. 2). On the other hand, one
hydrogen atom of amino group (–N1H2) is engaged in
strong intramolecular hydrogen bonding with the azome-
1
3
˚
thine nitrogen (–HN Hꢁ ꢁ ꢁN , 2.23 A) and inter-molecular
H-bonding with two oxygen atoms of the non-coordinated
1
˚
nitrate group (–HN Hꢁ ꢁ ꢁO, 2.48, 2.56 A) while the second
hydrogen atom forms a strong intermolecular hydrogen
bonding with one oxygen atom of the second non-coordi-
1
˚
nated nitrate group (–HN Hꢁ ꢁ ꢁO, 2.29 A), forming an
eight membered cavity in the center. These interactions
result in the formation of a hydrogen-bonded tetramer.
The 1H NMR spectrum of compound 1 in CDCl3 (polar
solvent) shows the –N2H signal at d 10.53 ppm, which is
upfield relative to the free ligand. A single signal at d
8.75 ppm, is observed for –N1H2 proton, while second signal
is obscured by the multiplet signals due to the phenyl protons
Crystallographic data for 1: C59H55Ag2N5O6P4S,
˚
M = 1301.76, monoclinic, a = 25.057(2) A, b = 15.3627
˚
˚
(14) A, c = 31.365(3) A, a = 90°, b = 98.4040(10)°, c = 90°,
3
˚
V = 11944.1(18) A , T = 100(2) K, space group C2/c (No.
15),
q
calcd = 1.448 g cmꢀ3
,
Z = 8, l(Mo-Ka) = 0.850
mmꢀ1, 62,522 reflections measured on a Bruker X8 Kappa
Fig. 2. Packing diagram of complex 1.