supramolecular architectures, such as pentagonal dendrim-
ers,7 single-wall nanotubes, light emitters,8 and discotic liquid
crystals.9
in the synthesis of penta-arylcorannulenes bearing functional
groups that are needed to achieve the desired architectures.
For example, our attempts to couple 1 with various arylzinc
or arylboronic acid partners bearing various functional groups
failed to produce the corresponding penta-arylcorannulenes
in satisfactory yield. Consequently, we searched for a more
general cross-coupling approach.
Here we report that a broad variety of functionalized penta-
arylcorannulene derivatives can be obtained in high yields
under mild conditions from 1 and the appropriate arylboronic
acids using Fu’s bulky phosphine ligand, tri(tert-butyl)phos-
phine.19
Our general procedure for the cross-coupling reactions of
1 at 0.1 mmol scale (Scheme 1)20 employ the substituted
arylboronic acid (8 equiv, 1.6 equiv per site), catalytic
amounts of Pd[P(t-Bu)3]2 (20%, 4% per site), and CsF (15
equiv, 3 equiv per site) in dioxane at 80 °C. The resulting
penta-arylcorannulenes, 2, 5, 8 and 11, were obtained under
these conditions in 59-83% yields.
The isolation and characterization of symmetrical coran-
nulene derivatives is not easy because of their low solubility
in most organic solvents.21 A typical example is 1,3,5,7,9-
penta(4-methoxycarbonylphenyl)corannulene, 2, which is
obtained by reacting 1 with 4-(methoxycarbonyl)phenylbo-
ronic acid. The procedure reported by Scott for another penta-
arylcorannulene,17 which involves filtration through a short
bed of silica-gel, afforded only traces of 2. Nevertheless,
avoiding the filtration and chromatographic purification
yielded a crude solid product that was purified by recrys-
tallization from chloroform, affording 2 in 41% yield.
Significantly higher yields were obtained with Fu’s catalytic
system,19 leading to pure 2 in 59% yield without recrystal-
lization (Scheme 1).
The synthetic difficulties en route to penta-functional
corannulene derivatives have been significantly reduced
owing to the available synthesis of corannulene.10 Further-
more, the challenge of symmetrical activation of all five
edges in the molecule has been satisfactorily met by Scott’s
discovery that the reaction of corannulene with ICl proceeds
with high regioselectivity to produce 1,3,5,7,9-pentachloro-
corannulene, 1.10b,11 Consequently, the main challenge
became the attachment of the desired functional groups and
binding devices onto the corannulene edges. This is a non-
trivial task considering the low reactivity of aryl chlorides
in cross-coupling reactions12 and the need to perform the
reaction five times on the same molecule.
Previous efforts to meet this challenge were based on
various methods of metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions.
Siegel’s protocol, which employs trialkyl aluminum com-
pounds under nickel(II) catalysis, can convert 1 into penta-
alkylcorannulenes in 30-50% yields.14 However, the analo-
gous nickel(II)-catalyzed reactions with metallo-aryl reactants,
including those of aluminum, magnesium, boron, and tin,
were met with partial success.
Some successful approaches have been found. For ex-
ample, Siegel has used the Negishi chemistry to achieve
several sym-penta-arylcorannulenes in 28-49% yield via
nickel-catalyzed cross-coupling of 1 with arylzinc chlo-
ride.13,14 Also Eberhard’s pincer catalyst15 was found useful
for these cross-coupling transformations with metallo-alkynyl
reactants.10b,16 Further advances by Scott offered the cross-
coupling of 1 with 2-chloroarylboronic acid using the
Suzuki-Miyaura protocol under Nolan’s conditions.17,18
We found that although the above-mentioned methods
work well for some aryl groups, their efficiency is limited
Compound 2 was successfully transformed into other
useful penta-arylcorannulenes. Thus, hydrolysis with KOT-
MS in refluxing THF for 16 h afforded 1,3,5,7,9-penta(4-
carboxyphenyl)corannulene, 3, in 86% yield. Reduction of
2 with DIBAL-H in THF at room temperature afforded
1,3,5,7,9-penta(4-hydroxymethylphenyl)corannulene, 4, in
65%. Avoiding filtration/chromatography workup in all other
reactions afforded numerous penta-arylcorannulenes, 2-14,
in good yields. All products exhibited low solubility in
common organic solvents, such as toluene, chloroform, and
ethyl acetate.
(5) (a) Wu, Y. T.; Siegel, J. S. Chem. ReV. 2006, 106, 4843–4867. (b)
Sygula, A.; Rabideau, P. W. In Carbon-Rich Compounds: From Molecules
to Materials; Haley, M., Tykwinski, R., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
Germany, 2006; p 529. (c) Sygula, A.; Xu, G.; Marcinow, Z.; Rabideau,
P. W. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 3637–3644. (d) Sygula, A.; Rabideau, P. W.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6323–6324. (e) Hirsch, A. Top. Curr. Chem.
1999, 199, 1–65. (f) Scott, L. T. Pure Appl. Chem. 1996, 68, 291–300. (g)
Seiders, T. J.; Siegel, J. S. Chem. Br. 1995, 31, 307–312.
(6) (a) Scott, L. T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4994–5007. (b)
Tsefrikas, V. E.; Scott, L. T. Chem. ReV. 2006, 106, 4868–4884.
(7) (a) Smith, D. K.; Diederich, F. Top. Curr. Chem. 2000, 210, 183–
227. (b) Dykes, G. M. J. Chem. Biotechnol. 2001, 76, 903–918.
(8) Mack, J.; Vogel, P.; Jones, D.; Kaval, N.; Sutton, A. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2007, 5, 2448–2452.
For example, 1,3,5,7,9-penta(4-methoxyphenyl)corannu-
lene, 5,14,22 and 1,3,5,7,9-penta(4-tert-butylthiophenyl)coran-
nulene, 8, were obtained in 83% and 59% yields, respec-
tively. While the pentaether 5 and pentathioether 8 exhibited
(9) (a) Kumar, S. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2006, 35, 83. (b) Kumar, S.; Wachtel,
E. J.; Keinan, E. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 3821–3827. (c) Keinan, E.; Kumar,
S.; Moshenberg, R.; Ghirlando, R.; Wachtel, E. J. AdV. Mater. 1991, 3,
251–254.
(16) Wu, Y.-T.; Bandera, D.; Maag, R.; Linden, A.; Baldridge, K. K.;
Siegel, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 10729–10739.
(17) Jackson, E. A.; Steinberg, B. D.; Bancu, M.; Wakamiya, A.; Scott,
L. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 484–485.
(10) (a) Barth, W. E.; Lawton, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 380–
381. (b) Seiders, T. J.; Elliott, E.; Grube, G.; Siegel, J. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 7804–7813. (c) Sygula, A.; Rabideau, P. W. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 6323–6324.
(18) (a) Grasa, G. A.; Viciu, M. S.; Huang, J.; Zhang, C.; Trudell, M. L.;
Nolan, S. P. Organometallics 2002, 21, 2866–2873. (b) Grasa, G. A.; Nolan,
S. P. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 119–122.
(11) (a) Cheng, P. Ph.D. Dissertation, Boston College, Boston, MA,
1996. (b) Scott, L. T. Pure Appl. Chem. 1996, 68, 291–300
.
(12) Grushin, V. V.; Alper, H. Chem. ReV. 1994, 94, 1047–1062.
(19) (a) Littke, A. F.; Fu, G. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 3387–
3388. (b) Littke, A. F.; Dai, C.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122,
4020–4028. (c) Littke, A. F.; Fu, G. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41,
4176–4211. (d) Kudo, N.; Perseghini, M.; Fu, G. C. Angew Chem. Int. Ed.
2006, 45, 1282–1284.
(13) (a) Negishi, E. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 1821–1823. (b) Negishi,
E.; Takahashi, T.; King, A. O. Org. Synth. 1988, 66, 67–74
(14) Grube, G. H.; Elliott, E. L.; Steffens, R. J.; Jones, C. S.; Baldridge,
K. K.; Siegel, J. S. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 713–716
.
.
(15) (a) Eberhard, M. R.; Wang, Z.; Jensen, C. M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 2002, 818–819. (b) Morales-Morales, D.; Grause, C.; Kasaok,
K.; Redon, R.; Cramer, R. E.; Jensen, C. M. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2000,
300-302, 958–963.
(20) The coupling reaction was successfully performed on larger scale
as well (0.4 mmol in the case of pentaester 2).
(21) Wu, Y.-T.; Bandera, D.; Maag, R.; Linden, A.; Baldridge, K. K.;
Siegel, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 10729–10739.
1064
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 5, 2009