ChemComm
Communication
Fig. 4 Acidochromic SHG switch of the poled thin film.
Fig. 3 Absorption and emission spectra of the 1/PMMA pristine film and
after exposure to HCl vapours.
recorded after each cycle confirm this behavior. In fact, the increase
of the integrated area under absorption spectra (see Fig. S8, ESI†)
indicates a loss of orientation of the chromophore during the
switches and well correlates with the drop in the NLO response.
This loss of the SHG signal has already been observed in other
photochromic switches in the PMMA matrix.4,5,24 Besides, the
integrity of the film after the repeated switches was also established
by emission spectroscopy and by proving the invariance of the film
thickness by profilometry (see Table S2, ESI†).
In this communication we report the large second-order
NLO response of the highly transparent chromophore 1. We
also evidence the ambivalent donor–acceptor role of the pyrene
unit resulting in an interesting acidochromic emissive and NLO
switch both in solution and in the solid state. To our knowledge, this
study represents the first demonstration of the acidomodulation
of the NLO response of a thin film, opening a new avenue for
preparation of convenient reversible-NLO switches.
ambivalent donor–acceptor role. It is to be noted that a related
phenomenon has been previously observed in some pyrrole-(p-
bridge)-pyridine-based chromophores, which showed sign inversion
of solvatochromism after alkylation of the pyridinic nitrogen.16
To study the solid state interconversion process, thin films
of 1 dispersed in polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) were prepared by
spin coating few drops of a dichloromethane solution (1/PMMA =
2 wt%; PMMA = 10 wt% with respect to the solvent) on a glass
substrate.17 By exposure of the 1/PMMA film to HCl vapours for 60 s,
the initial absorption maximum is shifted from 378 nm (neutral
form; e = 4610 cmꢁ1) to lower energy with one absorption at 396 nm
and a broad band at 434 nm (e = 3915 cmꢁ1) and the emission
maximum shifts from 446 nm (69% QY) to 546 nm (32% QY) (see
Fig. 3). The reverse reaction is induced by exposure of the film to
ammonia vapours for 30 s.
This interconversion can be exploited to produce a solid
state second-order NLO acidochromic switch. Corona poling18
on the 1/PMMA pristine film was carried out at 9.7 kV while
increasing the temperature at a rate of 1.8 1C minꢁ1 up to 60 1C.
The temperature was maintained at 60 1C for 90 min and then
gradually decreased to room temperature while monitoring the
SHG response of the film (see Fig. S5, ESI†).19 A second-order
NLO coefficient, d33, value of the 1/PMMA poled film equal to
0.55(ꢂ0.11) pm Vꢁ1 was obtained.20 The film was then stored in
the dark for at least 72 h after poling, in order to ensure that the
surface charges resulting from the deposition of ions on the film
surface during the corona poling process21 were neutralized and
a more stable SHG signal was reached (22 a.u.). The decay of the
SHG signal after poling was determined by monitoring the film
response for about 180 h (see Fig. S7, ESI†).
The SHG efficiency of the initial poled film and its switching
performances in the presence of HCl/ammonia vapours were
then monitored ex situ using a Maker fringe set-up22 at a fixed
angle of 601 using a p–p polarization. After exposure to HCl
vapours the SHG signal of the film increases up to 61 a.u., and
then decreases to about 4 a.u. after treatment with ammonia
vapours indicating a first acidoswitch with a SHG drop of about
93.5% (see Fig. 4).23 The observed decrease of the SHG signal
during the switches is probably due to the partial irreversible loss of
orientation through the acid–base treatment. Absorption spectra
Notes and references
1 B. J. Coe, in Non-Linear Optical Properties of Matter, ed. M. G.
Papadopoulos, A. J. Sadlej and J. Leszczynski, Springer Verlag,
Berlin, 2006, p. 571; V. Guerchais, L. Ordronneau and H. Le Bozec,
Coord. Chem. Rev., 2010, 254, 2533; K. A. Green, M. P. Cifuentes,
M. Samoc and M. G. Humphrey, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2011, 255, 2530;
F. Castet, V. Rodriguez, J. L. Pozzo, L. Ducasse, A. Plaquet and
B. Champagne, Acc. Chem. Res., 2013, 46, 2656.
2 P. K. Das, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, 7621; L. Sanguinet, J.-L. Pozzo,
M. Guillaume, B. Champagne, F. Castet, L. Ducasse and E. Maury,
J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, 10672; F. Mancois, L. Sanguinet, J.-L.
Pozzo, M. Guillaume, B. Champagne, V. Rodriguez, F. Adamietz,
L. Ducasse and F. Castet, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2007, 111, 9795; F. Mancois,
J.-L. Pozzo, J. Pan, F. Adamietz, V. Rodriguez, L. Ducasse, F. Castet,
A. Plaquet and B. Champagne, Chem. – Eur. J., 2009, 15, 2560; A. Plaquet,
´
ˇ
B. Champagne, J. Kulhanek, F. Bures, E. Bogdan, F. Castet, L. Ducasse
and V. Rodriguez, ChemPhysChem, 2011, 12, 3245; D. Liu, Z. Zhang,
H. Zhang and Y. Wang, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 10001; C. H. Wang,
N. N. Ma, X. X. Sun, S. L. Sun, Y. Q. Qiu and P. J. Liu, J. Phys. Chem. A,
2012, 116, 10496.
3 E. Cariati, C. Dragonetti, E. Lucenti, F. Nisic, S. Righetto, D. Roberto
and E. Tordin, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 1608.
4 J. Boixel, V. Guerchais, H. Le Bozec, D. Jacquemin, A. Amar,
A. Boucekkine, A. Colombo, C. Dragonetti, D. Marinotto, D. Roberto,
S. Righetto and R. De Angelis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 5367;
¨
R. Loucıf-Saibi, K. Nakatani, J. A. Delaire, M. Dumont and Z. Sekkat,
Chem. Mater., 1993, 5, 229; Y. Atassi, J. A. Delaire and K. Nakatani, J. Phys.
Chem., 1995, 99, 16320.
5 K. Nakatani and J. A. Delaire, Chem. Mater., 1997, 9, 2682; M. Sliwa,
´
S. Letard, I. Malfant, M. Nierlich, P. G. Lacroix, T. Asahi,
H. Masuhara, P. Yu and K. Nakatani, Chem. Mater., 2005, 17, 4727.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Chem. Commun.