10.1002/chem.201905296
Chemistry - A European Journal
FULL PAPER
Korenaga, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 7044-7057; i) Y. Y.
Khomutnyk, A. J. Argꢀelles, G. A. Winschel, Z. Sun, P. M. Zimmerman,
P. Nagorny, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 444-456; j) K. Kanomata, M.
Terada, Synlett 2016, 27, 581-585; k) F. Li, T. Korenaga, T. Nakanishi,
J. Kikuchi, M. Terada, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 2629-2642; l) J.
Zhang, P. Yu, S.-Y. Li, H. Sun, S.-H. Xiang, J. Wang, K. N. Houk, B.
Tan, Science 2018, 361, 8707-8710; m) M. Shimizu, J. Kikuchi, A.
Kondoh, M. Terada, Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 5747-5757; n) J. Kikuchi, H.
Aramaki, H. Okamoto, M. Terada, Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 1426-1433; o)
Y. Kwon, J. Li, J. P. Reid, J. M. Crawford, R. Jacob, M. S. Sigman, F.
D. Toste, S. J. Miller, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 6698-6705.
a) M. Terada, H. Tanaka, K. Sorimachi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
3430-3431; b) J. Jiang, J. Qing, L.-Z. Gong, Chem.-Eur. J. 2009, 15,
7031-7034; c) M. Terada, K. Moriya, K. Kanomata, K. Sorimachi, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 12586-12590; d) E. P. ꢁvila, R. M. S. Justo, V.
P. Goncalves, A. A. Pereira, R. Diniz, G. W. Amarante, J. Org. Chem.
2015, 80, 590-594; e) C. Ma, J.-Y. Zhou, Y.-Z. Zhang, G.-J. Mei, F. Shi,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 5398-5402; f) M. Zhang, C. Yu, J. Xie,
X. Xun, W. Sun, L. Hong, R. Wang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57,
4921-4925; g) J. Kikuchi, M. Terada, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58,
8458-8462.
the substituent (Ar) of the azlactone and the binaphthyl backbone
of the catalyst is also crucial for the enantioselection. The
present finding, namely, the template effect, is regarded as one
of the key stereocontrolling systems in chiral phosphoric acid
catalysis and hence, expands the scope of enantioselective
reactions catalysed by chiral phosphoric acids and their
derivatives. Further studies on the development of
enantioselective reactions using the present intriguing effect are
in due course in our laboratory.
[7]
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research on Innovative Areas “Advanced Molecular
Transformations by Organocatalysts” from MEXT, Japan (No.
23105002 & 23105005) and a Grant in Aid for Scientific
Research on Innovative Areas “Hybrid Catalysis for Enabling
Molecular Synthesis on Demand” from MEXT, Japan (No.
JP17H06447 & JP18H04660). We also thank the Japan Society
for the Promotion of Sciences for the JSPS Research Fellowship
for Young Scientists (K. K.).
[8]
[9]
For reviews of azlactones in organic synthesis, see; a) J. S. Fisk, R. A.
Mosey, J. J. Tepe, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 1432-1440; b) N. M.
Hewlett, C. D. Hupp, J. J. Tepe, Synthesis 2009, 2825-2839; c) A.-N. R.
Alba, R. Rios, Chem.-Asian J., 2011, 6, 720-734; d) P. P. de Castro, A.
G. Carpanez, G. W. Amarante, Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 10294-10318;
e) I. F. S. Marra, P. P. de Castro, G. W. Amarante, Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2019, 5830-5855.
Keywords: Asymmetric Synthesis • Enantioselectivity • DFT •
Organocatalysis • Reaction Mechanism
For 3,5-dimethoxyphenyl substituted azlactones as an efficient
substrate for enantioselective transformations, see; G. Lu, V. B. Birman,
Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 356-358.
[1]
For selected reviews on chiral phosphoric acid catalysts, see; a) T.
Akiyama, Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5744-5758; b) M. Terada, Synthesis
2010, 1929-1982; c) D. Kampen, C. M. Reisinger, B. List, Top. Curr.
Chem. 2010, 291, 395-456; d) D. Parmar, E. Sugiono, S. Raja, M.
Rueping, Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 9047-9153.
[10] a) J. S. Fisk, J. J. Tepe, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3058-3059; b)
R. A. Mosey, J. S. Fisk, T. L. Friebe, J. J. Tepe, Org. Lett. 2008, 10,
825-828.
[11] M. J. Frisch, et al. Gaussian 09, Revision C.01, Gaussian, Inc.,
Wallingford CT, 2010. See SI for the full list of the authors.
[2]
For comprehensive reviews on organocatalysts, see; a) Science of
Synthesis, Asymmetric Organocatalysis 1, Lewis Base and Acid
Catalysts (Ed.: B. List), Georg Thieme Verlag KG, New York, 2012; (b)
Science of Synthesis, Asymmetric Organocatalysis 2, Brønsted Base
and Acid Catalysts, and Additional Topics (Ed.: K. Maruoka), Georg
Thieme Verlag KG, New York, 2012.
[12] a) A. D. Becke, Phys. Rev. A, 1988, 38, 3098-3100; b) C. Lee, W. T.
Yang, R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785-789.
[13] For M06-2X, see: Y. Zhao, D. G. Truhlar, Theor. Chem. Acc. 2008, 120,
215-241.
[14] See SI for less stable other tansition structures (Figures S1 and S2).
[15] No transition structure of Path B could be located in the solution phase
even by thorough screening for initial structures and optimization
methods. However, during the course of this investigation, other
transition state TS-B’ was identified in the solution phase, which affords
an acetal product in the reaction of vinyl ether with phosphoric acid
(Figure S2). The relative energy for TS-B’ (ΔE = 8.9 kcal/mol [ΔG = 28.9
kcal/mol]) is higher than that for TS-C (ΔE = 3.5 kcal/mol [ΔG = 25.6
kcal/mol]) but lower than that for TS-A (ΔE = 16.9 kcal/mol [ΔG = 45.0
kcal/mol]). Although the transition structure of the acetal formation
reaction, instead of Path B, was identified in the solution phase, Path C
is the most favorable among the pathways investigated.
[3]
For seminal works of chiral phosphoric acid catalysts, see; a) T.
Akiyama, J. Itoh, K. Yokota, K. Fuchibe, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004,
43, 1566-1568; b) D. Uraguchi, M. Terada, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 5356-5357. For catalytically active species, also see; c) M. Hatano,
K. Moriyama, T. Maki, K. Ishihara, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49,
3823-3826; d) M. Terada, K. Kanomata, Synlett 2011, 1255-1258.
For a review of computational studies of organocatalytic reactions, see
P. H.-Y. Cheong, C. Y. Legault, J. M. Um, N. Çelebi-Ölçüm, K. N. Houk,
Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 5042-5137.
[4]
[5]
[6]
For a review of computational studies of chiral Brønsted acid catalysis,
see R. Maji, S. C. Mallojjala, S. E. Wheeler, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47,
1142-1158.
[16] Single-point energy calculations of the optimized transition states
were conducted at the same level in the solution phase according to
the SCRF method based on CPCM (CH2Cl2). As the result, relative
energies of the transition state were calculated to be: Path A: +18.4
kcal/mol, Path B: +12.1 kcal/mol, Path C: +8.2 kcal/mol. See SI for
details (Figure S1).
For representative and recent examples of computational studies of
chiral Brønsted acid catalysis, see; a) L. Simón, J. M. Goodman, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 8741-8747; b) M. Yamanaka, T. Hirata, J. Org.
Chem. 2009. 74, 3266-3271; c) K. Mori, Y. Ichikawa, M. Kobayashi, Y.
Shibata, M. Yamanaka, T. Akiyama, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135,
3964-3970; d) M. N. Grayson, J. M. Goodman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013,
135, 6142-6148; e) Y. Shibata, M. Yamanaka, J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78,
3731-3736; f) I. Čorić, J. H. Kim, T. Vlaar, M. Patil, W. Thiel, B. List,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 3490-3493; g) K. Kanomata, Y. Toda,
Y. Shibata, M. Yamanaka, S. Tuzuki, I. D. Gridnev, M. Terada, Chem.
Sci. 2014, 5, 3515-3523; h) M. Terada, T. Komuro, Y. Toda, T.
[17] The effective electron delocalization through attractive non-covalent
interaction between AZ and VE in TS-C was confirmed by NCIPLOT.
See SI for details (Figure S3).
[18] See SI for 1H NMR monitoring in details (Figures S8-S11).
[19] The relative stereochemistry of the product was determined by X-ray
crystrallographic analysis, and the absolute stereochemistry at the C3
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.