2414
X. Wu et al. / Tetrahedron 65 (2009) 2408–2414
3. Mayers, B. T.; Fry, A. J. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 411.
4. Wu, X.; Davis, A. P.; Fry, A. J. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5633.
3). In contrast to 1g, bond a of the 4-methoxy derivative 1v is ac-
tually slightly longer than bond a0 of the neutral compound, prob-
ably because of repulsion between the two electron pairs para to
each other on the nitrogen and oxygen atoms. Otherwise the bond
lengths in the substituted ring differ very little from those in the
unsubstituted ring or in the parent compound 1a. But in the cation
radical of 1v, bond alternation is evident: e.g., bonds a and c are
much shorter than either bonds a0 and c0 or the corresponding
bonds of 1a, and bonds b and d are longer than the same bonds in
the unsubstituted rings and in 1a cation radical. Because of bond
alternation, the range of computed ring bond lengths is much larger
(0.039 Å) in the substituted ring of the cation radical than in the
same ring of the neutral form (0.010 Å).
5. Zuman, P. Substituent Effects in Organic Polarography; Plenum: New York, NY,
1967.
6. Pysh, E. S.; Yang, N. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 2124.
7. Amthor, S.; Noller, B.; Lambert, C. Chem. Phys. 2005, 316, 141.
8. Seo, E. T.; Nelson, R. F.; Fritsch, J. M.; Marcoux, L. S.; Leedy, D. W.; Adams, R. N.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 3498.
9. Dapperheld, S.;Steckhan, E.;Brinkhaus, K. H. G.; Esch, T. Chem. Ber.1991,124, 2557.
10. Hicks, L. D.; Fry, A. J.; Kurzweil, V. C. Electrochim. Acta 2004, 50, 1039.
11. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.;
Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.; Burant, J. C.;
Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.;
Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.;
Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao,
O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.;
Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.;
Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.;
Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.;
Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman,
J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.;
Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.;
Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.;
Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 03,
Revision D.01; Gaussian,: Wallingford, CT, 2004.
+
MeO
MeO
MeO
d'
c'
d
c
e
b'
b
N
a
a'
N
N
C6H5
4a
C6H5
4b
C6H5
4c
12. Wu, X.; Dube, M. A.; Fry, A. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 7667.
13. Forrest, J. J. Chem. Soc. 1960, 581.
14. Patil, N. M.; Kelkar, A. A.; Chaudhari, R. V. J. Mol. Catal. A 2004, 223, 45.
15. Walter, R. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 5999.
16. Uemura, S.; Toshimitsu, A.; Okano, M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1978,
1076.
4. Summary
17. (a) Chen, B.; Lee, S.; Venkatamaran, D.; DiSalvo, F.; Lobkovsky, E.; Nakayama, M.
Cryst. Growth Des. 2002, 2, 101; (b) Trost, B. M.; Curran, D. P. Tetrahedron Lett.
1981, 22, 1287.
18. Nelson, R. F.; Adams, R. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 3925.
19. Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648.
The density functional computations reveal a strong resonance
interaction between the central nitrogen atom of triphenylamines
with nitro groups located para and ortho to it in the neutral amine and
with methoxy groups located para to it in the amine cation radical.
The experimental oxidation potentials are highly correlated (R¼0.995)
with ionization potentials computed by density functional theory.
20. Tomasi, J.; Persico, M. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 2027.
21. (a) Gordon, A. J.; Ford, R. A. The Chemist’s Companion; Wiley: New York, NY,
1972; pp 145–153; (b) Exner, O. In Correlation Analysis in Chemistry; Chapman,
N. B., Shorter, J., Eds.; Plenum: New York, NY, 1978; pp 439–540.
22. van Bekkum, H.; Verkade, P. E.; Wepster, B. M. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 1959,
78, 815.
Acknowledgements
23. Fry, A. J. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 6558.
24. Naumov, V. A.; Samdal, S.; Naumov, A. V.; Gundersen, S.; Volden, H. V. Russ. J.
Gen. Chem. 2005, 75, 1956.
25. Sobolev, A. N.; Belsky, V. K.; Romm, I. P.; Chernikova, N. Y.; Gurianova, E. N. Acta
Crystallogr., C 1985, 41, 967.
26. Rodionov, A. N.; Rucheva, N. I.; Rogozhin, K. L.; Shigorin, D. N. J. Appl. Spectrosc.
1974, 20, 409.
Financial support was provided by the National Science Foun-
dation under grant #CHE-0438474 and by Wesleyan University.
L.K.S. was the recipient of a sabbatical leave from Fairfield University.
27. Hellwinkel, D.; Melan, M.; Degel, C. R. Tetrahedron 1973, 29, 1895.
28. The value of the sþ substituent constant of the nitro group is slightly smaller
References and notes
(0.740) than its
s value (0.778), demonstrating a slight mitigation of its pow-
erful inductive electron-withdrawing effect by resonance when it is para to an
atom bearing a positive charge and able to conjugate with it as in 3a.
1. Schmidt, W.; Steckhan, E. Chem. Ber. 1980, 113, 577.
2. Halas, S.; Okyne, K.; Fry, A. J. Electrochim. Acta 2003, 48, 1837.