SCHEME 1. MCR Approach to r-Amino Phosphonates
Four-Component Reaction for the Preparation of
r-Amino Phosphonates from Methyleneaziridines
Peter M. Mumford,† Gary J. Tarver,‡ and Michael Shipman*
Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of Warwick, Gibbet
Hill Road, CoVentry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom, and
Schering Plough Corporation, Newhouse, Scotland,
ML1 5SH, United Kingdom
with the hydrophosphonylation step. In this way, the preparation
of R-amino phosphonates can be realized through a more direct
multicomponent reaction (MCR). As four-component reactions
(4CRs) are generally more useful in diversity-oriented synthesis
and library generation than 3-CRs,10 we thought that the
development of a 4-CR for the synthesis of R-amino phospho-
nates would be of considerable value to medicinal chemists. In
this Note, we describe what we believe is the first 4-CR for the
synthesis of R-amino phosphonates and outline its scope and
limitations.
In previous studies, we have devised a 3-CR for the synthesis
of ketimines from 2-methyleneaziridines both in solution11 and
on solid phase.12 The reaction involves opening of methylenea-
ziridine at C-3 by using a Grignard reagent under Cu(I) catalysis,
and capture of the resulting metalloenamine with a carbon-based
electrophile (R2-X). By further manipulation of the resulting
ketimines, a range of compound classes including ketones,11,12
amines,13 R-amino nitriles,14 hydantoins,15 and ꢀ-lactams16 can
be made in “one-pot”. By combining this approach to ketimines
with hydrophosphonylation,6 we reasoned that it should be
possible to develop a flexible approach to R-amino phosphonates
(Scheme 1). Notably, this 4-CR would create three new
intermolecular bonds and generate up to four points of chemical
diversity in a single transformation.
ReceiVed March 5, 2009
R-Amino phosphonates can be rapidly assembled in moderate
to good yields (42-65%) via a “one-pot” process that brings
together four components through the construction of three
new intermolecular bonds.
R-Amino phosphonic acids and their derivatives act as
analogues of R-amino acids, and as such they constitute
important motifs in medicinal chemistry.1,2 They display a range
of biological activities including use as antibiotics,3 herbicides,4
and fungicides.5 The most general and straightforward prepara-
tive route to these compounds involves hydrophosphonylation
of imines (Pudovic reaction).6 This transformation has broad
substrate scope and has been successfully extended to the
synthesis of enantiopure derivatives through the application of
asymmetric catalysis.7
Methyleneaziridines 1a-c used in this study were prepared
according to published methods.17 Treatment of 1a in THF with
EtMgCl (2.5 equiv) and CuI (20 mol %) induced ring-opening
of the aziridine at C-3 to generate the metalloenamine, which
was alkylated with BnBr (1.5 equiv). Subsequent addition of
diethylphosphite (2.5 equiv) yielded R-amino phosphonate 2a
in 65% yield after silica gel column chromatography (Scheme
The Kabachnik-Fields reaction8,9 combines imine formation,
through condensation of an amine with an aldehyde (or ketone),
† University of Warwick.
‡ Schering Plough.
(1) For a monograph, see: Aminophosphonic and Aminophosphinic Acids:
Chemistry and Biological ActiVity; Kukhar, V. P., Hudson, H. R., Eds.; John
Wiley & Sons: New York, 2000.
(2) Huang, J.; Chen, R. Heteroat. Chem. 2000, 11, 480–492.
(3) Wu, Z.; Walsh, C. T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92, 11603–
11607.
(4) For recent examples, see: (a) Forlani, G.; Occhipinti, A.; Berlicki, L.;
Dzieziola, G.; Wieczorek, A.; Kafarski, P. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 3193–
3199. (b) Xiao, L.-X.; Li, K.; Shi, D.-Q. Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem.
2008, 183, 3156–3165.
(5) Yang, S.; Gao, X.-W.; Diao, C.-L.; Song, B.-A.; Jin, L.-H.; Xu, G.-F.;
Zhang, G.-P.; Wang, W.; Hu, D.-Y.; Xue, W.; Zhou, X.; Lu, P. Chin. J. Chem.
2006, 24, 1581–1588.
(6) Pudovik, A. N.; Konovalova, I. V. Synthesis 1979, 81–96.
(7) (a) Gro¨ger, H.; Hammer, B. Chem.sEur. J. 2000, 6, 943–948. (b) Ma,
J.-A. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2006, 35, 630–636. (c) Merino, P.; Marque´s-Lo´pez, E.;
Herrera, R. P. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 1195–1208.
(8) (a) Fields, E. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 1528–1531. (b) Kabachnik,
M. I.; Medved, T. Y. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 1952, 83, 689–692. (c) Kabachnik,
M. I.; Medved, T. Y. IzV. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim. 1953, 1126–1128.
(9) For a review, see: Zefirov, N. S.; Matveeva, E. D. ARKIVOC 2008, 1–
17.
(10) For a monograph, see: Multicomponent Reactions; Zhu, J., Bienayme´,
H., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinhein, Germany, 2005.
(11) (a) Hayes, J. F.; Shipman, M.; Twin, H. Chem. Commun. 2000, 1791–
1792. (b) Hayes, J. F.; Shipman, M.; Twin, H. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 935–
942.
(12) Margathe, J. F.; Shipman, M.; Smith, S. C. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4987–
4990.
(13) (a) Hayes, J. F.; Shipman, M.; Twin, H. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1784–
1785. (b) Hayes, J. F.; Shipman, M.; Slawin, A. M. Z.; Twin, H. Heterocycles
2002, 58, 243–250.
(14) Shiers, J. J.; Clarkson, G. J.; Shipman, M.; Hayes, J. F. Chem. Commun.
2006, 649–651.
(15) Montagne, C.; Shiers, J. J.; Shipman, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47,
9207–9209.
(16) Cariou, C. C. A.; Clarkson, G. J.; Shipman, M. J. Org. Chem. 2008,
73, 9762–9764.
(17) (a) Ennis, D. S.; Ince, J.; Rahman, S.; Shipman, M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 2000, 2047–2053. (b) Shipman, M. Synlett 2006, 3205–3217. (c) Ince,
J.; Ross, T. M.; Shipman, M.; Slawin, A. M. Z.; Ennis, D. S. Tetrahedron 1996,
52, 7037–7044.
10.1021/jo9004958 CCC: $40.75
Published on Web 04/07/2009
2009 American Chemical Society
J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 3573–3575 3573