1480
W.-Y. Chiang, F.-E. Hong / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 694 (2009) 1473–1481
HHC@C(H)–CHH), 2.96 (d, JH–H = 12.4 Hz, 4H, allylic HHC@C(H)–
CHH), 3.72 (m, 2H, dppm), 3.58 (s, 2H, –CH2N(CH3)2), 2.29 (s, 6H,
–CH2N(CH3)2), 2.05–1.34 (m, 22H, cyclohexyl); 31P NMR(CDCl3, d
(ppm)): 47.4 (s, 1P, P(Cy)2), 39.7 (s, 2P, dppm); 13C NMR (CD2Cl2,
d (ppm)): Cation: 206.5–202.8 (s, 4C, CO), 137.6–128.7 (m, 24C,
arene), 120.2 (s, 1C, allylic C@C–C), 106.8 (s, 1C, P–C„C), 70.8 (d,
1C, P–C„C), 66.8 (s, 1C, C–N), 62.2 (m, 2C, allylic C@C–C), 45.0
(s, 6C, N–C), 37.6 (t, 1C, dppm), 30.7 (s, 4C, (Cy)2), 29.2 (s, 4C,
(Cy)2), 27.5, 27.0 (d, JC–P = 25.6 Hz, JC–P = 53.1 Hz, 2C, P(Cy)2), 26.2
(s, 4C, (Cy)2); Anion: 110.8 (s, 1C, allylic C@C–C), 55.4 (2C, allylic
C@C–C); MS (FAB): m/z = 1042 [M]+.
ture was solved by direct methods using a SHELXTL package [76]. All
non-H atoms were located from successive Fourier maps and
hydrogen atoms were refined using a riding model. Anisotropic
thermal parameters were used for all non-H atoms, and fixed iso-
tropic parameters were used for H atoms [77]. Crystallographic
data for compounds 5c are summarized in Table 1.
Acknowledgments
We thank the National Science Council of the ROC (Grant NSC
95-2113-M-005-015-MY3) for financial support.
3.4. Synthesis and characterization of 7cB
Appendix A. Supplementary material
A 100 mL round-bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer
was charged with 0.01 mmol of 4c (0.0089 g), 0.005 mmol of [(g3
-
CCDC 692831 contains the supplementary crystallographic data
for compound 5c. These data can be obtained free of charge from
article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/
C3H5)PdCl]2 (0.0018 g), 0.005 mmol of NaBF4 (0.0006 g) and 5 mL
toluene. The solution was stirred at 25 °C for 30 min before the sol-
vent was removed under reduced pressure. The orange-red colored
residue was purified by CTLC and was identified as [(
PPh2)Co2(CO)4( -Me2NCH2C„CP(Cy)2)Pd(
3-C3H5)]+[BF4]À (7cB).
The yield was 99%.
l-PPh2CH2-
l,g
g
References
3.4.1. Selected spectroscopic data for 7cB
1H NMR(CD2Cl2, d (ppm)): 7.43–7.10 (m, 20H, arene), 5.48 (m, 1
H, allylic HHC@C(H)–CHH), 4.47 (m, 1H, dppm) 4.07 (d, 2H
JH–H = 6.8 Hz, 2H, allylic HHC@C(H)–CHH), 3.36 (m, 1H, dppm),
3.01 (d, JH–H = 12.0 Hz, 2H, allylic HHC@C(H)–CHH), 2.64 (s, 2H,
–CH2N(CH3)2), 1.92 (s, 6H, –CH2N(CH3)2), 2.07–1.26 (m, 22 H,
cyclohexyl);
[1] D. Alberico, M.E. Scott, M. Lautens, Chem. Rev. 107 (2007) 174.
[2] J.-P. Corbet, G. Mignani, Chem. Rev. 106 (2006) 2651.
[3] K.N. Houk, H. Sessler, J.-M. Lehn, S.V. Ley, A. de Meijere, S.L. Schreiber, J. Thiem,
B.M. Trost, F. Vögtle, H. Yamamoto (Eds.), Cross-Coupling Reactions
Practical Guide in Topics in Current Chemistry, vol. 219, Springer-Verlag,
Heidelberg, 2002.
– A
[4] J.J. Li, G.W. Gribble (Eds.), Palladium in Heterocyclic Chemistry: A Guide for the
Synthetic Chemist, Springer, Berlin, 2000.
[5] J. Fuji (Ed.), Palladium Reagents and Catalysts: Innovations in Organic
Synthesis, Wiley, Chichester, 1995.
[6] H. Geissler, in: Transition Metals for Organic Synthesis, vol. 1, M. Beller, C.
Bolm (Eds.), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1998, pp. 158–193.
[7] F. Diederich, P.J. Stang (Eds.), Metal-Catalyzed Cross-coupling Reactions,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 1998.
[8] T.E. Barder, S.D. Walker, J.R. Martinelli, S.L. Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127
(2005) 4685.
13C NMR (CD2Cl2, d (ppm)): 206.5–202.7 (s, 4C, CO), 137.6–
128.5 (m, 24C, arene), 120.2 (s, 1C, allylic C@C–C), 106.8 (s, 1C,
P–C„C), 86.6 (d, 1C, P–C„C), 65.9 (s, 1C, C–N), 63.0 (m, 2C, allylic
C@C–C), 44.9 (s, 6C, N–C), 37.0 (t, 1C, dppm), 31.3–26.2 (m, 12C,
cyclohexyl);
MS (FAB): m/z = 1042 [M]+; Anal. Calc.: C, 46.60; H, 5.04; N, 0.95.
Found: C, 52.17; H, 5.09; N, 1.24%.
[9] J. Hassan, M. Sévingnon, C. Gozzi, E. Schulz, M. Lemaire, Chem. Rev. 102 (2002)
1359.
[10] W. Tang, X. Zhang, Chem. Rev. 103 (2003) 3029.
3.5. General procedure for amination reactions
[11] N.G. Andersen, B.A. Keay, Chem. Rev. 101 (2001) 997.
[12] C.A. Bessel, P. Aggarwal, A.C. Marschilok, K.J. Takeuchi, Chem. Rev. 101 (2001)
1031.
[13] S.D. Walker, T.E. Barder, J.R. Martinelli, S.L. Buchwald, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
43 (2004) 1871.
An oven-dried Schlenk tube was charged with 4c (0.01 mmol,
0.0089 g), [(g
3-C3H5)PdCl]2 (0.005 mmol, 0.0018 g) and a base
(1.4 mmol). The tube was evacuated and backfilled with nitrogen
followed by the addition of an aryl bromide (1.00 mmol), toluene
(1.0 mL) and morpholine (1.20 mmol). The tube was sealed with
a Teflon screw cap, and the mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 2 h.
After all starting materials had been consumed; the mixture was
allowed to cool down to room temperature and then diluted with
ether (40 mL). The resulting suspension was transferred into a
separatory funnel and washed with water (10 mL). The organic
layer was separated, dried with anhydrous MgSO4 and concen-
trated under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by
CTLC with hexane/ethyl acetate as a mobile phase. The solvent
was removed under reduced pressure, and the yield of the eluted
product was determined.
[14] J.F. Hartwig, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 37 (1998) 2046.
[15] G. Mann, J.F. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 (1996) 13109.
[16] N. Kataoka, Q. Shelby, J.P. Stambuli, J.F. Hartwig, J. Org. Chem. 67 (2002) 5553.
[17] A.F. Littke, C. Dai, G.C. Fu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 (2000) 4020.
[18] J.G. Planas, J.A. Gladysz, Inorg. Chem. 41 (2002) 6947.
[19] Q.-S. Hu, Y. Lu, Z.-Y. Tang, H.-B. Yu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 2856.
[20] T.E. Pickett, F.X. Roca, C.J. Richards, J. Org. Chem. 68 (2003) 2592.
[21] Z.-Y. Tang, Y. Lu, Q.-S. Hu, Org. Lett. 5 (2003) 297.
[22] J.A. Osborn, F.H. Jardine, J.F. Young, G. Wilkinson, J. Chem. Soc. A (1966) 1711.
[23] R.R. Schrock, J.A. Osborn, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 98 (1976) 2134.
[24] R.R. Schrock, J.A. Osborn, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 98 (1976) 2143.
[25] R.R. Schrock, J.A. Osborn, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 98 (1976) 4450.
[26] B. Cornils, W.A. Herrmann (Eds.), Applied Homogeneous Catalysis with
Organometallic Compounds, vols. 1&2, VCH, New York, 1996.
[27] R. Noyori, Asymmetric Catalysis In Organic Synthesis, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
1994.
[28] G.W. Parshall, S.D. Ittel, Homogeneous Catalysis, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin, 1992
(Chapter 8).
[29] K.P.C. Vollhardt, Acc. Chem. Res. 10 (1977) 1.
3.6. X-ray crystallographic studies
[30] A.N. Collins, G.N. Sheldrake, J. Crosby, Chirality in Industry, John Wiley & Sons,
Inc., 1992.
Suitable crystals of 5c were sealed in thin-walled glass capillar-
ies under nitrogen atmosphere and mounted on a Bruker AXS
SMART 1000 diffractometer. Intensity data were collected in
[31] H.B. Kagan, Asymmetric synthesis using organometallic catalysts, in: G.
Wilkinson, F.G.A. Stone, E.W. Abel (Eds.), Comprehensive Organometallic
Chemistry, vol. 8, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1982 (Chapter 53).
[32] J.P. Wolfe, S. Wagaw, S.L. Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 (1996) 7215.
[33] M.S. Driver, J.F. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 (1996) 7217.
[34] P. Braunstein, J. Organomet. Chem. 689 (2004) 3953.
[35] H. Tomori, J.M. Fox, S.L. Buchwald, J. Org. Chem. 65 (2000) 5334.
[36] H.N. Nguyen, X. Huang, S.L. Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 11818.
[37] J. Puddephatt, Chem. Soc. Rev. 12 (1983) 99.
1350 frames with increasing
x (width of 0.3° per frame). The
absorption correction was based on the symmetry equivalent
reflections using SADABS program. The space group determination
was based on a check of the Laue symmetry and systematic ab-
sences, and was confirmed using the structure solution. The struc-