Radicicol exists in the same bent conformation when bound
and unbound to Hsp90 and produces a favorable entropy of
8.3 cal/mol upon binding. Not surprisingly, the predisposition
of RDC to the bent conformation is believed to be responsible
for its similar activity in both cellular and recombinant
assays.13
ever, to the best of our knowledge, no analogues have been
synthesized that exhibit a predisposed cis-amide functionality.
Figure 1. Inhibitors of Hsp90.
Figure 2. GDA conformations in solution (left) and bound to Hsp90
(right).
In contrast to the bent, cis-amide conformation of GDA
when bound to Hsp90, both solution and crystal structures
have demonstrated that this natural product exists in an
extended, trans-amide conformation when unbound to
Hsp90 (Figure 2).14 Multiple studies have demonstrated
that prior to binding Hsp90, GDA must undergo two
conformational changes; the ansa ring must rotate over
the benzoquinone moiety and the amide bond must
isomerize from trans to cis by rotation about C1-N22 and
C20-N22 (Figure 1). The first event is reported to occur
spontaneously; however, isomerization of the amide bond
is estimated to exceed 20 kcal/mol.15 Accordingly,
isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) experiments have
shown that GDA exhibits an entropic penalty of -6.4 cal/
mol upon binding Hsp90.16,17
Recently, chimeric inhibitors of Hsp90 were disclosed
that contained both the quinone ring from GDA and the
resorcinol moiety of RDC in an attempt to mimic the
hydrogen bonding interactions exemplified by the two
natural products when bound to the Hsp90 N-terminal
nucleotide-binding pocket. This approach has produced
novel scaffolds for Hsp90 inhibition; however, none of
the reported analogues exhibit conformational character-
istics exhibited by either natural product when bound to
Hsp90.21-23 Analysis of the seco derivative, radamide (RDA,
Figure 1), revealed the potential to introduce conformational
aspects of both natural products when bound to Hsp90.
Herein we present the first series of conformationally
constrained chimeric Hsp90 inhibitors exhibiting both a cis-
amide moiety and a bent conformation.
Retrosynthetically, we envisioned the desired analogues
could be obtained via a Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons
(HWE) olefination reaction between cyclic phosphonate
1 and homologated aldehydes, 2 and 3 (Scheme 1).
Compound 1 was proposed to result from tandem reduc-
tion/intramolecular cyclization of compound 4, which
could be obtained from commercially available 4-benzy-
loxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde in four steps. Aldehydes 2
and 3 could be prepared directly from 521 and 6,
respectively.
As a consequence of these thermodynamic data, Santi
and co-workers hypothesized that GDA analogues con-
taining a predisposed cis-amide bond will result in ∼1000-
fold increase in Hsp90 affinity through reduction of
entropic penalties. Such postulations have inspired sub-
sequent studies aimed at determining the effect of trans/
cis isomerization of the GDA-amide moiety.18-20 How-
(13) Roe, S. M.; Prodromou, C.; O’ Brien, R.; Ladbury, J. E.; Piper,
P. W.; Pearl, L. H. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 260.
(14) Thepchatri, P.; Eliseo, T.; Cicero, D. O.; Myles, D.; Snyder, J. P.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3127.
(15) Lee, Y.; Marcu, M. G.; Neckers, L. Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 991.
(16) Chiosis, G.; Huezo, H.; Rosen, N.; Mimnaugh, E.; Whitesell, L.;
Neckers, L. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2003, 2, 123
(17) Schulte, T. W.; Neckers, L. M. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.
1998, 42, 273
(18) Onuoha, S. C.; Mukund, S. R.; Coulstock, E. T.; Sengerova, B.;
Shaw, J.; McLaughlin, S. H.; Jackson, S. E. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 372, 287
(19) Onodera, H.; Kaneko, M.; Takahashi, Y.; Uochi, Y.; Funahashi,
J.; Nakashima, T.; Soga, S.; Suzuki, M.; Ikeda, S.; Yamashita, Y.; Rahayu,
.
Commencing with commercially available 4-benzyloxy-
3-methoxybenzaldehyde (7, Scheme 2), phenol 8 was formed
Via Dakin oxidation.24 Treatment of 8 with diazophosphonate
9 resulted in the phenolic ether 10 upon a rhodium carbenoid
.
.
E. S.; Kanda, Y.; Ichimura, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 1577
.
(21) Clevenger, R. C.; Blagg, B. S. J. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4459–4462
(22) Shen, G.; Blagg, B. S. J. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2157
(23) Shen, G.; Wang, M.; Welch, T. R.; Blagg, B. S. J. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 71, 7618
(24) Li, S.; Chen, L.; Tsai, J.; Tzeng, J.; Tsai, I.; Chi, E. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2007, 48, 2139.
.
(20) Zhang, M. Q.; Gaisser, S.; Nur-E-Alam, M.; Sheehan, L. S.;
Vousden, W. A.; Gaitatzis, N.; Peck, G.; Coates, N. J.; Moss, S. J.; Radzom,
M.; Foster, T. A.; Sheridan, R. M.; Gregory, M. A.; Roe, S. M.; Prodromou,
C.; Pearl, L.; Boyd, S. M.; Wilkinson, B.; Martin, C. J. J. Med. Chem.
.
.
2008, 51, 5494
.
2354
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 11, 2009