organic compounds
Data collection
Because of the lack of classical hydrogen-bond donors in
the structure of (I), the packing is determined by weaker
interactions, namely CÐHÁ Á Áꢀ and ꢀ±ꢀ contacts.
Nicolet R3m four-circle
diffractometer
!/2ꢄ scans
4125 measured re¯ections
3746 independent re¯ections
2759 re¯ections with I > 2ꢆ(I)
Rint = 0.019
ꢄmax = 30.1ꢀ
h = 0 ! 10
k = 0 ! 14
CÐHÁ Á Áꢀ interactions arise, ®rstly, between piperidine
l = 22 ! 22
atom H17A of one molecule and the benzene ring of another
3
3 standard re¯ections
every 100 re¯ections
intensity decay: none
molecule at (32 x, 21 + y,
z), and, secondly, between
2
piperidine atom H18A and the benzene ring of the molecule at
(1 + x, y, z) (Table 2). These interactions form two-dimen-
sional networks, extending parallel to the ab plane (Fig. 2).
ꢀ±ꢀ stacking interactions exist between the tetrazole rings
of two molecules related by the symmetry transformation
(1 x, y, 1 z), the centroid±centroid distance being
Re®nement
Re®nement on F2
R[F2 > 2ꢆ(F2)] = 0.042
wR(F2) = 0.120
S = 1.06
3746 re¯ections
w = 1/[ꢆ2(F2o) + (0.0582P)2
+ 0.0879P]
where P = (F2o + 2Fc2)/3
(Á/ꢆ)max < 0.001
3
Ê
Áꢇmax = 0.17 e A
3
Ê
0.25 e A
232 parameters
All H-atom parameters re®ned
Áꢇmin
Extinction correction: SHELXL97
=
Ê
3.7015 (13) A. These interactions connect the two-dimen-
sional networks into a three-dimensional polymeric struc-
ture.
Extinction coef®cient: 0.480 (16)
Table 2
ꢀ
Ê
Hydrogen-bonding and CÐHÁ Á Áꢀ interaction geometry (A, ).
CgBz is the centroid of the benzene ring.
Experimental
The title compound was prepared by aminomethylation of
1-phenyltetrazole with piperidine and formaldehyde according to the
method described by Karavai & Gaponik (1991). A solution of
1-phenyltetrazole (5.8 g, 40 mmol), piperidine (3.5 ml, 40 mmol) and
paraform (3 g) in tri¯uoroacetic acid (50 ml) was heated under re¯ux
for 5 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was
treated with an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide (30%, 20 ml).
The title compound was isolated by extraction of the resulting solu-
tion with diethyl ether (3 Â 30 ml), evaporation of the diethyl ether
and recrystallization of the residue from ethanol (yield 64%, 6.2 g;
DÐHÁ Á ÁA
DÐH
HÁ Á ÁA
DÁ Á ÁA
DÐHÁ Á ÁA
C11ÐH11Á Á ÁN13
0.978 (14)
1.012 (16)
1.028 (16)
2.648 (13)
3.246 (15)
2.726 (15)
3.4395 (15)
4.0673 (19)
3.6679 (17)
138.3 (10)
139.2 (11)
152.1 (11)
C17ÐH17AÁ Á ÁCgBzi
C18ÐH18AÁ Á ÁCgBzii
3
2
Symmetry codes: (i)
x, 12 + y, 32 z; (ii) 1 + x, y, z.
H-atom positions were found from a difference Fourier map and
all associated parameters were re®ned freely [CÐH = 0.96 (1)±
Ê
1.05 (2) A].
1
m.p. 361 K). H NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): ꢂ 1.43±1.64 (m, 6H,
Data collection: R3m Software (Nicolet, 1980); cell re®nement:
R3m Software; data reduction: R3m Software; program(s) used to
solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to
re®ne structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics:
ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare
material for publication: SHELXL97 and PLATON (Spek, 2003).
3CH2), 2.40 (t, 4H, 2CH2), 3.82 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.58±7.66 (m, 3H, Ph),
7.80±7.88 (m, 2H, Ph). Single crystals of (I) suitable for analysis were
grown by slow evaporation from a 2-propanol solution at room
temperature in air.
Crystal data
C13H17N5
Mr = 243.32
Monoclinic, P21=n
Mo Kꢁ radiation
Cell parameters from 25
re¯ections
Supplementary data for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic
archives (Reference: AV1171). Services for accessing these data are
described at the back of the journal.
ꢄ = 12.4±20.3ꢀ
Ê
a = 7.7537 (13) A
Ê
1
b = 10.436 (3) A
Ê
ꢅ = 0.08 mm
T = 293 (2) K
c = 15.937 (3) A
ꢃ = 96.142 (13)ꢀ
Prism, colourless
0.54 Â 0.50 Â 0.46 mm
References
3
Ê
V = 1282.2 (5) A
Allen, F. H. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 380±388.
Z = 4
Dx = 1.260 Mg m
3
Altomare, A., Burla, M. C., Camalli, M., Cascarano, G. L., Giacovazzo, C.,
Guagliardi, A., Moliterni, A. G. G., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (1999). J.
Appl. Cryst. 32, 115±119.
Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.
Table 1
Selected intermolecular distances (A).
Ê
Ivashkevich, D. O., Lyakhov, A. S., Voitekhovich, S. V., Gaponik, P. N. &
Ivashkevich, L. S. (2002). Acta Cryst. C58, m563±m564.
Karavai, V. P. & Gaponik, P. N. (1991). Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin. pp. 66±71.
(In Russian.)
Lyakhov, A. S., Voitekhovich, S. V., Gaponik, P. N. & Ivashkevich, L. S. (2003).
Acta Cryst. C59, o22±o23.
Nicolet (1980). R3m Software. Nicolet XRD Corporation, Cupertino, Cali-
fornia, USA.
È
Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXL97. University of Gottingen, Germany.
Spek, A. L. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 7±13.
N1ÐC5
N1ÐN2
N1ÐC6
N2ÐN3
N3ÐN4
N4ÐC5
C5ÐC12
1.3510 (15)
1.3546 (12)
1.4296 (13)
1.2928 (15)
1.3553 (17)
1.3169 (14)
1.4878 (16)
C12ÐN13
N13ÐC14
N13ÐC18
C14ÐC15
C15ÐC16
C16ÐC17
C17ÐC18
1.4613 (15)
1.4637 (13)
1.4724 (14)
1.5158 (18)
1.5136 (19)
1.5116 (19)
1.508 (2)
ꢁ
o294 Alexander S. Lyakhov et al.
C13H17N5
Acta Cryst. (2004). C60, o293±o294