Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 5727−5729
Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of 3,1,2- and 2,1,8-Re(I) and
99mTc(I)
Metallocarborane Complexes
−
Andrew E. C. Green, Patrick W. Causey, Anika S. Louie, Andrea F. Armstrong,
Laura E. Harrington, and John F. Valliant*
Departments of Chemistry and Medical Physics & Applied Radiation Sciences,
McMaster UniVersity, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4M1
Received April 7, 2006
Microwave heating was used to prepare
η
5-rhenium carborane
radiation as an alternate heat source was investigated with
some surprising and rather useful consequences.
complexes in aqueous reaction media. For carboranes bearing
sterically demanding substituents, isomerization of the cage from
3,1,2 to 2,1,8 derivatives occurred concomitantly with complexation.
Microwave heating was equally effective at the tracer level using
technetium-99m, affording access to a new class of synthons for
designing novel molecular imaging agents.
As an initial experiment, the carboxylic acid-functionalized
nido-ortho-carborane 12,4d (Scheme 1) was heated in a
microwave reactor with an excess of [Re(CO)3(H2O)3]Br3
in 0.1 M KF(aq) (Scheme 1) and the progress of the reaction
was monitored by HPLC. The desired metallocarborane
complex 3,1,2-[K][Re(CO)3(RHC2B9H9)] (R ) CH2CH2-
CO2H) (2) was present in >90% yield after 7 min at 180
°C: near-quantitative conversion can be achieved in only 5
min if the reaction is heated at 200 °C. We have observed
that 2 can also be formed when the corresponding closo-
carborane 3 is used in place of 1. Ultimately, we found that
the maximum isolated yields were obtained by heating the
carborane with an excess of [Re(CO)3(H2O)3]Br, followed
by a second heating in the presence of an additional amount
of the rhenium reagent. This approach ensures complete
consumption of the nido-carborane ligand, which often has
a similar Rf value to its metal complex, thereby facilitating
chromatographic purification.
As stated previously, when rhenacarboranes are prepared
in aqueous media using a conventional heat source, the
presence of fluoride is required to prevent premature
decomposition of the metal(I) starting material.2 Since these
same complexation reactions occur within mere minutes
using a microwave reactor, it was of interest to see whether
equally good conversion to the desired metallocarboranes
could be achieved without fluoride. Indeed, the nido-
carborane 1 formed the corresponding rhenium complex 2
in the absence of fluoride with no significant decrease in
yield. This is somewhat remarkable given the absence of an
obvious base, traditionally thought to be needed to afford
good yields of this class of metallocarboranes.4 Reactions
Because of their compact size, robustness, and versatile
synthetic chemistry, organometallic complexes of 99mTc(I)
and Re(I) are considered highly attractive cores from which
to prepare molecular radioimaging and radiotherapy agents.1
Regrettably, the preparation of organometallic imaging and
therapy agents has been hampered by the fact that traditional
organometallic ligands are generally incompatible with the
reaction conditions routinely used to prepare radiopharma-
ceuticals. This includes the need to complete labeling
reactions in less than one half-life, in aqueous reaction media,
while employing only very small amounts (i.e., 10-9-10-12
mol) of the radioisotope.
With these requirements in mind, we recently developed
a methodology that can be used to prepare η5-carborane
complexes of both 99mTc(I) and Re(I) in water.2 The approach
entails using fluoride ion to prevent the decomposition of
the technetium or rhenium starting materials over the
prolonged reaction times and elevated temperatures needed
to form the desired complexes. However, for certain func-
tionalized carboranes, particularly those with sterically
demanding substituents, only modest product yields could
be achieved even under optimized reaction conditions. To
overcome this limitation, the impact of using microwave
(3) Lazarova, N.; James, S.; Babich, J.; Zubieta, J. Inorg. Chem. Commun.
2004, 7, 1023-1026.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
(1) Alberto, R. Top. Curr. Chem. 2005, 252, 1.
(2) (a) Sogbein, O. O.; Merdy, P.; Morel, P.; Valliant, J. F. Inorg. Chem.
2004, 43, 3032-3034. (b) Sogbein, O. O.; Green, A. E. C.; Schaffer,
P.: Chankalal, R.; Lee, E.; Healy, B. D.; Morel, P.; Valliant, J. F.
Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 9574-9584. (c) Sogbein, O. O.; Green, A. E.
C.; Valliant, J. F. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 9585-9591.
(4) (a) Hawthorne, M. F.; Andrews, T. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87,
2496-2496. (b) Hawthorne, M. F.; Young, D. C.; Andrews, T. D.
Howe, D. V.; Pilling, R. L.; Pitts, A. D.; Reintjes, M.; Warren, L. F.
Wegner, P. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 879-896. (c) Ellis, D.
D.; Jelliss, P. A.; Stone, F. G. A. Organometallics 1999, 18, 4982-
4994. (d) Valliant, J. F.; Morel, P.; Schaffer, P.; Kaldis, J. H. Inorg.
Chem. 2002, 41, 628-630.
10.1021/ic0605928 CCC: $33.50
Published on Web 06/22/2006
© 2006 American Chemical Society
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 45, No. 15, 2006 5727