4266
D. A. Gubler, R. M. Williams / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 4265–4267
BnO
OBn
OBn
O
O
OBn
BnO
BnO
OH
MeO
Me
MeO
Me
MeO
Me
Me
H
MeO
Me
a-b
a, b
c, d
NCO2Me
+
NCO2Me
OMs
NCO2Me
N
NCO2Me
NO2
NO2
NO2
BnO
BnO
OPMB
OBn
1
BnO
OPMB
10
2
3
5
O
OH
O
MeO
Me
MeO
Me
MeO
Me
g
H
e, f
c
NCO2Me
NCO2Me
N
NCO2Me
NO2
NO2
BnO
BnO
O
OH
OH
OMs
OH
4
5
11
BnO
BnO
Scheme 4. Reagents and conditions: (a) MsCl (1.5 equiv), Et3N (3.0 equiv), 0 °C,
30 min, 53%; (b) Zn dust (5.0 equiv), NH4Cl (10.0 equiv), acetone/water (4:1), rt, 3 h,
55%; (c) 10% Pd/C (120 wt.%), Et3N (6.0 equiv), EtOAc, H2, rt, 30 min, then O2, 50%.
MeO
Me
MeO
Me
- MsOH
NCO2Me
NCO2Me
NH2
HN
BnO
BnO
OMs
6
7
With indoline 9 in hand, we decided to pursue the synthesis of
mitomycin K using the same reaction, with prior installation of the
C10 exocyclic olefin. Accordingly, mesylation of alcohol 5 under
standard conditions provided the aminocyclization precursor bear-
ing the exocyclic olefin (Scheme 4). Reductive aminocyclization
conditions used previously did provide tetracycle 10 without any
isomerization of the exocyclic olefin to the corresponding indole
(mitosene) adduct.16 Treatment of tetracycle 10 under hydrogena-
tion conditions gave quinone 11 in moderate yield. Quinone 11
comprises the core skeleton of mitomycin K, lacking only the C9a
methoxy group. Installation of the requisite methoxy moiety may
be accomplished by an allylic C–H activation strategy, and efforts
in this vein are in progress.
In summary, benzazocines were synthesized in high yield by
use of a reductive aminocyclization reaction without the need for
prior activation of the aniline. The tetracyclic core of the mitomyc-
ins was also accomplished in a single step from an acyclic precur-
sor using this methodology. This strategy was used in formation of
the tetracyclic indoline compound 9, as well as the core structure
of mitomycin K bearing an exocyclic olefin (i.e., 10).
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a)
1 (2.0 equiv), 2 (1.0 equiv), ZnCl2
(1.5 equiv), NaHMDS (2.0 equiv), DMF, ꢀ45 °C, 2 h, 85%; (b) Dess–Martin
(1.6 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt, 2 h, 98%; (c) formalin (112 equiv), LiOH (0.4 equiv), THF/
water (20:3), rt, 20 h, 99%; (d) DDQ (1.3 equiv), CH2Cl2/water (95:5), rt, 2 h, 92%; (e)
MsCl (1.3 equiv), Et3N (3.0 equiv), 0 °C, 30 min, 85%; (f) CeCl3ꢁ7H2O (5.0 equiv),
NaBH4 (3.0 equiv), 0 °C, 30 min, 92%; (g) Zn dust (5.0 equiv), NH4Cl (10.0 equiv),
acetone/water (4:1), rt, 3 h, 99%.
arene 113 and aziridine aldehyde 214, followed by oxidation of the
resultant alcohol (obtained as a 2:1 mixture of diastereomers R:S)
to ketone 3. Methylenation and removal of the PMB ether with
DDQ proceeded in excellent yield over two steps to provide pri-
mary alcohol 4. Conversion of alcohol 4 to the corresponding mes-
ylate and reduction of the ketone under Luche conditions gave
secondary alcohol 5 in high yield as a single diastereomer. Reduc-
tion of the nitro group using zinc dust did not provide the expected
aniline 6, but rather gave benzazocine 715 in near quantitative
yield as the product of a reductive aminocyclization reaction. To
the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of a cyclization
reaction in this family of compounds which proceeds without the
need for prior activation of the aniline.
Having found an efficient method for formation of benzazocine
7, we were interested in examining the utility and scope of this
transformation. Specifically, we investigated the possibility of
forming the tetracyclic core of the mitomycins in one step from
an acyclic precursor via this newly discovered reductive aminocy-
clization reaction. Accordingly, ketone 3 was transformed to bis-
mesylate 8 in four straightforward steps consisting of PMB ether
removal, mesylation, reduction of the ketone, and a second mesy-
lation (Scheme 3). Treatment of bis-mesylate 8 under identical ni-
tro reduction conditions furnished tetracyclic indoline 9 in 53%
yield. Attempted conversion of indoline 9 to the mitomycins is
now in progress.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
(CA51875). D.A.G is grateful to Eli Lilly for a graduate fellowship.
Mass spectra were obtained on instruments supported by the
NIH Shared Instrumentation Grant GM49631. Mr. Donald Dick is
acknowledged for mass spectrometric data.
Supplementary data
Complete experimental details and spectroscopic data for all
new compounds. Supplementary data associated with this article
OBn
OBn
O
OMs
MeO
Me
MeO
Me
a-d
NCO2Me
OPMB
NCO2Me
OMs
NO2
NO2
References and notes
OBn
OBn
3
8
1. Hata, T.; Sano, Y.; Sugawara, R.; Matsumae, A.; Kanamori, K.; Shima, T.; Hoshi,
T. J. Antibiot. 1956, 9, 141–146.
OBn
2. Rajski, S. R.; Williams, R. M. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 2723–2795.
3. Iyer, V. N.; Szybalski, W. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1963, 50, 355–361.
4. Rajski, S. R.; Rollins, S. B.; Williams, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 2192–
2193.
5. Bradner, W. T. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2001, 7, 35–50.
6. For a review on Kishi’s synthesis of mitomycins A, B, and C see: Kishi, Y. J. Nat.
Prod. 1979, 42, 549–568.
MeO
Me
e
N
NCO2Me
OBn
9
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: (a) DDQ (1.3 equiv), CH2Cl2/water (95:5), rt,
2 h, 85%; (b) MsCl (1.5 equiv), Et3N (3.0 equiv), 0 °C, 30 min, 53%; (c) CeCl3ꢁ7H2O
(5.0 equiv), NaBH4 (3.0 equiv), 0 °C, 30 min, 93%; (d) MsCl (1.5 equiv), Et3N
(3.0 equiv), 0 °C, 30 min, 75%; (e) Zn dust (5.0 equiv), NH4Cl (10.0 equiv), acetone/
water (4:1), rt, 3 h, 53%.
7. For a review of Fukuyama’s synthesis of mitomycins A and C see: Fukuyama, T.;
Yang, L. Studi. Nat. Prod. Chem. 1993, 13, 433–471.
8. For
a review on Danishefsky’s synthetic efforts towards the mitomycins
including the total synthesis of mitomycin
K see: Danishefsky, S. J.;
Schkeryantz, J. M. Synlett 1995, 475–490.