6910
K. Vazdar, M. Vazdar / Tetrahedron Letters 56 (2015) 6908–6911
(BrCH2COOEt) led to the formation of weakly bound complex
M-3. Nucleophilic attack of the sulfur group to the electrophilic
carbon atom in BrCH2COOEt resulted in the formation of com-
pound M-4. This reaction is exergonic, as shown by the free energy
barriers of 6–8 kcal molꢀ1 followed by stabilization of M-4 by
22–24 kcal molꢀ1 (depending on the substituents). In order to fol-
low the further reaction steps more easily, the Brꢀ anion was
removed from complex M-4 since it was not essential in the subse-
quent reaction steps.
After removal of Brꢀ anion from molecule M-4 and deprotona-
tion with a second equivalent of Na2CO3, M-5 is formed which rep-
resents a branching point for regioselective reactions. The first
possible pathway proceeds via direct nucleophilic attack of the
nitrogen atom substituted with R1 groups leading to M-6. In the
case of phenyl and cyclohexyl groups, the calculated barrier for
cyclization was around 14 kcal molꢀ1, which contrasted with the
n-hexyl group where the barrier was lowered by 4 kcal molꢀ1
.
After cyclization, M-6 is protonated in the reaction mixture leading
to elimination of EtOH and the final product M-7. The second pos-
sible pathway involves cyclization of the nitrogen atom directly
connected to the b-lactam ring. In order for this reaction to occur,
an additional conformational change is necessary to position the
reactive nitrogen and carbon centers in closer contact. Unfortu-
nately, the barrier for the process could not be computationally
determined due to the complex conformational change, but it
was calculated that isomers M-50 were destabilized by
2–3 kcal molꢀ1 with respect to M-5. Regardless of this energeti-
cally slightly unfavorable step, in the cases of phenyl and cyclo-
hexyl group the ensuing products M-60 were found to be more
easily accessible when compared to the pathway without confor-
mational change (7.1 and 8.3 kcal molꢀ1 versus 14.2 and
14.6 kcal molꢀ1, respectively). Moreover, after protonation and
elimination of EtOH, thermodynamically more stable products
M-70 are obtained with energy differences compared to M-7 being
ꢀ2.5 and ꢀ0.7 kcal molꢀ1, respectively. In the case of the n-hexyl
group, regardless of the lower barrier leading to M-60 as compared
to M-6 (7.8 versus 10.5 kcal molꢀ1, respectively), a thermodynam-
ically less stable product was obtained with energy difference to
M-7 being +1.9 kcal molꢀ1. These results were in agreement with
the experimental data presented in Table 1 where M-70 was iso-
lated in the case of phenyl and cyclohexyl substituent (compounds
3a and 3g) while in the case of n-hexyl substituent (compound 3i0)
M-7 was isolated in excess. While the exact ratio of structural
regioisomers could not be predicted based on the free energy dif-
ferences between M-7 and M-70, it was gratifying to note that
the regioselectivity pattern was reproduced with DFT calculations.
Next we explain the reasons for the different regioselectivities.
In order to demonstrate this more clearly, the geometries of the
relevant structures in the conversion of M-5 to the regioisomer
M-6 formed by cyclization with the R1-nitrogen atom (Fig. 2a) in
the case of phenyl substituent were compared (geometries of the
cyclohexyl derivatives are not shown due to a qualitatively similar
picture). At the same time we also show the cyclization step lead-
ing to regioisomer M-60 formed by cyclization with the nitrogen
atom directly attached to the b-lactam ring (Fig. 2b). It can be seen
that product M-6 is destabilized compared to the transition struc-
ture M-TS2 as reflected by a very long C–N bond of 1.64 Å. This was
also visible in the relative energy of M-6, which is only
0.2 kcal molꢀ1 more stable than the transition state M-TS1
(Table 1). The same situation held true for product M-60 which is
less stable (but only when thermal correction is taken into account,
Figure 2. Optimized geometries during the five-membered ring cyclization step for
phenyl derivatives of iminothiazolidinone. (a) Transformation from M-5 to M-6; (b)
transformation from M-50 to M-60 after conformational change of M-5 to M-50.
reflected by the calculated free energy barriers (14.2 kcal molꢀ1
versus 7.1 kcal molꢀ1, respectively). Although both products M-6
and M-60 are relatively unstable due to a negligible barrier for
the reverse reaction, they are immediately protonated in the
reaction mixture leading to the final products M-7 and M-70, where
M-70 is 2.5 kcal molꢀ1 more stable than M-7. Therefore, the forma-
tion of M-70 is preferred both kinetically (due to steric reasons and
in turn the lower free energy barrier for cyclization of M-50 to M-60)
and thermodynamically (as witnessed by the larger stability of
product M-70). A similar situation also held for cycꢀlo1hexyl deriva-
tives and the final product M-70 was 0.7 kcal mol more stable
than M-7. However, products M-6 and M-60 were both slightly sta-
0
bilized compared to the transition state M-TS2 and M-TS2 , respec-
tively, (see Table 2 for relative free energy barriers), but this does
not affect the regioselectivity.
In the case of the n-hexyl substituent, a diminished steric repul-
sion between ethoxy and n-hexyl groups changed the regioselec-
tivity pattern. In contrast to the phenyl substituent, M-6 in
n-hexyl derivative had a C–N bond distance of 1.54 Å (Fig. 3a),
which was 0.10 Å shorter than the corresponding phenyl derivative
(Fig. 2a). This is a result of larger flexibility of n-hexyl chain which
see ESI) than M-TS2 by 0.2 kcal molꢀ1, also having a relatively long
0
C–N bond distance of 1.58 Å. Still, there are notable differences in
these two cyclization steps, and it was determined that it was
twice as expensive to bring the ethoxy and phenyl groups together
(Fig. 2a) than the b-lactam ring and phenyl group, (Fig. 2b) as
Figure 3. Optimized geometries during the five-membered ring cyclization step for
n-hexyl derivatives of iminothiazolidinone. (a) Transformation from M-5 to M-6;
(b) transformation from M-50 to M-60 after conformational change of M-5 to M-50.