Angewandte
Chemie
effect of the silyl moiety revealed that the use of the bulky
triisopropylsilyl group reduced the enantioselectivity to
18% ee (Table 1, entry 2), whereas the small trimethylsilyl-
substituted ester was converted into the desired product with
a promising level of asymmetric induction (Table 1, entry 3).
Although the screening of other catalysts could not improve
the selectivity (Table 1, entries 4–6), use of mesitylene as a
solvent at lower temperature had a positive effect, furnishing
the target material with 86% ee (Table 1, entries 7 and 8).
Having the optimized conditions in hand, the scope of this
alkylation was then examined (Table 2). Irrespective of the
electronic nature and substituent pattern of the benzylic
Scheme 3. Alkylation of a-methyl-a-phenylethynyl ester.
g-hydrogen atom of the allenyl ester, thereby making the
generation of the reactive enolate far less feasible.[20] Notably,
under our catalytic reaction conditions, the g-alkylated allenyl
ester was not observed at all.
Table 2: Alkylation of a-alkyl-a-(trimethylsilyl)ethynyl esters.[a]
At this point, we turned our attention to the use of cesium
hydroxide monohydrate, as a stronger base to overcome this
deficiency, under otherwise identical reaction conditions. As a
result, the alkylated compound could be obtained in 88%
yield within 27 hours without the loss of the enantioselectivity
(Table 3, entry 1).[21] This newly developed set of reaction
conditions had a broad substrate scope with respect to alkyl
Entry
R2
R3
Yield [%][b]
ee [%][c]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Et
Bn
70
72
74
79
59
89
73
85
81
78
86
90
82
83
90
87
84
89
87
90
3-MeC6H4CH2
4-MeOC6H4CH2
2-ClC6H4CH2
H2C C(CH3)CH2
(CH3)2C CHCH2
(E)-PhCH CHCH2
Bn
2-MeC6H4CH2
(E)-PhCH CHCH2
Table 3: Alkylation of a-aryl-, alkenyl-, and alkylethynyl esters.[a]
=
=
=
Et
Et
Entry R1
R2
R3
Yield [%][b] ee [%][c]
=
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Me Bn
88
85
81
88
94
94
90
92
96
90
90
82
93
95
94
95
96
[a] Reactions conditions: the alkynyl ester (0.10 mmol) and alkyl halide
(0.12 mmol) in the presence of 2 mol% (S)-1a (0.002 mmol) and
powdered KOH (0.25 mmol). [b] Yield of the isolated product. [c] Deter-
mined by chiral HPLC or GC analysis after desilylation of the product.
Bn=benzyl.
Me 3-MeC6H4CH2
Me 4-MeOC6H4CH2
Me 2-ClC6H4CH2
Me H2C C(CH3)CH2 92
Me H2C CHCH2
=
=
ꢀ
81
84
90
88
Me HC CCH2
Me tBuO2CCH2
8[d]
9
10
11
12
13
halides, the alkylation gave the products in good yields and
ee values (Table 2, entries 2–4).[19] Excellent levels of enan-
tioselectivity were attained in the reactions involving prenyl
and methallyl bromides (Table 2, entries 5 and 6). Cinnamyl
bromide could be utilized as well (Table 2, entry 7). To
investigate the tolerance of the other a-alkyl group of the
ester, a-ethyl-a-(trimethylsilyl)ethynyl ester was subjected to
this enantioselective alkylation and resulted in the formation
of the desired compounds in satisfactory yields and having
ee values ranging from 87% to 90% (Table 2, entries 8–10).
In the process of expanding the substrate scope of this
phase transfer catalyzed alkylation to include other a-alkynyl
esters having either an aryl, alkenyl, or alkyl substituent at the
acetylene terminus, we became aware of the significantly
decreased reactivity of these substrates. For example, benzy-
lation of the a-phenylethynyl ester 5 under the aforemen-
tioned reaction conditions led to the formation of product 6 in
only 28% yield after 10 days, even though the enantioselec-
tivity was remarkably high (Scheme 3). Examination of the
remaining components revealed the complete disappearance
of the starting a-alkynyl ester 5 and the formation of the
allenyl ester 7 in a racemic form. This fact indicated the facile
base-mediated isomerization of the a-alkynyl ester, which has
a rather acidic a-hydrogen atom relative to the poorly acidic
Et
Et
Bn
=
H2C C(CH3)CH2 87
92
4-MeOC6H4 Me H2C C(CH3)CH2 87
4-MeOC6H4 Me Bn
=
4-ClC6H4
Me Bn
Me Bn
Me Bn
85
82
69
14[e]
15[e]
93
90
nBu
[a] Reactions conditions: the alkynyl ester (0.10 mmol) and alkyl halide
(0.12 mmol) in the presence of 2 mol% (S)-1a (0.002 mmol) and
powdered CsOH·H2O (0.50 mmol). [b] Yield of the isolated product.
[c] Determined by chiral HPLC analysis. [d] Performed at À308C.
[e] 10 equiv of CsOH·H2O.
halides and a-alkyl-a-alkynyl esters as showcased in Table 3.
Use of benzylic and allylic halides in the reaction with
a-methyl-a-phenylethynyl ester furnished the corresponding
products in high yields and with enantioselectivities ranging
from 90 to 96% ee (Table 3, entries 1–7). Alkylation with
bromoacetate gave the product with slightly lower enantio-
selectivity (Table 3, entry 8). Alkylation of other a-aryl-
ethynyl esters with different steric and electronic properties
also worked very efficiently (Table 3, entries 9–13). Further-
more, this method was applicable to alkynyl esters having an
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5014 –5017
ꢀ 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
5015