V. P. Kamath et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 5198–5200
5199
see entry 7). The ratio was determined by HPLC using authentic
forodesine HCl as a reference.6
BOM OMe
N
N
Ph
Ph
O
BOM OMe
Based on the results from Table 1, 8 was reacted with BH3–Me2S
O
Et2O/
Anisole
reagent to furnish 9 as a mixture with b/a
ratio of 4:1.22 Hydrolysis
N
N
N
N
NH
BBr3
DCM
O
+
-20 0
55%
C
of 9 was carried out in MeOH and concd HCl under reflux condi-
tions for 1 h to give product 10 in 90% yield. The two compounds
were finally isolated by column chromatography.23 The b-anomer
was characterized and was found to be identical in all respects
with the compound published in the literature.10
In conclusion, an alternative route to synthesize forodesine HCl
has been demonstrated. Work on improving the synthetic route is
still in progress.
O
N
O
O
O
O
Li
Ph
Ph
H
7
H
6
5
OMe
OMe
N
O
H
H
H
N
N
N
NH
N
N
MeOH/H+
BH3Me2S
N
N
H
H
N
H
DMF
HO
90%
HO
N
N
8
HO
Acknowledgement
H
OH
HO
OH
HO
HO
10
OH
We thank Dr. Ken Belmore at The University of Alabama, Tusca-
loosa for the high-field NMR spectral analysis.
β/α
9
= 4/1
Scheme 2. Progress towards the synthesis of forodesine HCl (1).
References and notes
1. Pegg, A. E.; Williams-Ashman, H. G. Biochem. J. 1969, 115, 241.
2. Ragione, F. D.; Oliva, A.; Gragnaniello, V.; Russo, G. L.; Palumbo, R.; Zappia, V. J.
Biol. Chem. 1990, 265, 6241.
Table 1
Reaction conditions for reduction of the imine using various reducing agents
3. Toorchen, D.; Miller, R. L. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1991, 41, 2023.
4. (a) Miles, R. W.; Tyler, P. C.; Evans, G. B.; Furneaux, R. H.; Parkin, D. W.;
Schramm, V. L. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 13147; (b) Miles, R. W.; Tyler, P. C.;
Bagdassarian, C. K.; Furneaux, R. H.; Schramm, V. L. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 8615.
5. (a) Horenstein, B. A.; Parkin, D. W.; Estupinan, B.; Schramm, V. L. Biochemistry
1991, 30, 10788; (b) Horenstein, B. A.; Schramm, V. L. Biochemistry 1993, 32,
7089.
6. Evans, G. B.; Furneaux, R. H.; Gainsford, G. J.; Schramm, V. L. Tetrahedron 2000,
56, 3053.
7. Tyler, P. C.; Furneaux, R. H. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 8411.
8. Tyler, P. C.; Limberg, G.; Schramm, R. H.; Furneaux, V. L. Tetrahedron 1997, 53,
2915.
OMe
BOM
N
OMe
BOM
N
N
N
N
N
H
N
N
HO
HO
H
O
O
O
O
9. Tyler, P. C.; Furneaux, R. H.; Schramm, V. L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1999, 7, 2599.
10. Evans, G. B.; Tyler, P. C.; Furneaux, R. H.; Hutchison, T. L.; Kezar, H. S.; Morris, P.
E.; Schramm, V. L. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 5723.
11. Fleet, G. W. J.; Son, J. C. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 2637.
12. (a) Yokoyama, M.; Momotake, A. Synthesis 1999, 1541; (b) Najera, C.; Yus, M.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10, 2245.
13. Coopola, G. M.; Schuster, H. F. Asymmetric Synthesis. Construction of Chiral
Molecules Using Amino Acids; John Wiley: New York, 1987.
14. Silverman, R. B.; Levy, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 815.
15. Thottahill, J. F.; Moniot, J. L.; Mueller, R. H.; Wong, M. K. Y.; Kissick, T. P. J. Org.
Chem. 1986, 51, 3140.
11
12
No.
Solvent
Reducing reagent
NaCNBH3
b/
a
ratio
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
THF
THF
THF
THF
THF
THF
THF
1: 1
1:4
1:4
1:4
1:4
1:1
2:1
L-Selectride + NaCNBH3
R-MeCBS + BH3Me2S
S-MeCBS + BH3Me2S
STAB
NaBH4
BH3Me2S
16. Resek, J. E.; Myers, A. I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 7051.
17. (a) Hamada, Y.; Tanada, Y.; Yokokawa, F.; Shioiri, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23,
5435; (b) Couturier, M.; Andresen, B. M.; Jorgensen, J. B.; Tucker, J. L.; Busch, F.
R.; Brenek, S. J.; Dube, P.; AmEnde, D. J.; Negri, J. T. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2002, 6,
42.
18. Hamada, Y.; Hara, O.; Kawai, A.; Kohno, Y.; Shioiri, T. Tetrahedron 1991, 47,
8635.
19. Shimojima, Y.; Hayashi, H.; Ooka, T.; Shibukawa, M.; Iitaka, Y. Tetrahedron Lett.
1982, 23, 5435.
amount of OsO4 and N-methylmorpholine N-oxide (NMO) in aque-
ous acetone to furnish the diol, 4 with the desired stereochemistry
in 70% yield.17 The diol was further protected as a benzylidene ace-
tal mixture, 5 under standard conditions in 90% yield.18
20. (a) Momotake, A.; Togo, H.; Yokoyama, M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999,
1193; (b) Evans, G. B.; Furneaux, R. H.; Lewandowicz, A.; Schramm, V. L.; Tyler,
P. C. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 3412.
The key step was the addition of the lactam to the lithiated 9-
deazahypoxanthine (see Scheme 2). Compound
6 (generated
in situ by reacting the 9-bromo deazahypoxanthine10 with n-BuLi)
was coupled to the N,O-protected lactam, 5 at ꢀ20 °C and stirred
for 20 min. The reaction mixture was slowly warmed to 0 °C and
then stirred further for 1 h.19 Workup of the reaction furnished
the crude product. The crude was purified by column chromatogra-
phy to furnish 7 as a foam in 55% yield.20 Compound 7 was treated
with BBr3 in DCM and stirred at rt for 2 h. Workup of the reaction
mixture gave the cyclized adduct, 8 which was taken directly to the
next step without any further purification.21
At this stage a number of reducing agents and reaction condi-
tions were attempted on a model compound 1110 to selectively re-
duce the imine to furnish the target compound (see Table 1).
Reduction of the imine, 11 with bulky reducing agents predomi-
21. 9-Bromo deazahypoxanthine (1 g, 2.9 mmol) dissolved in Et2O/anisole
mixture at ꢀ20 °C was treated with n-butyl lithium solution (1.6 M,
1.9 mL, 3.0 mmol) and stirred for 10 min. Compound
5 (0.9 g, 2.9 mmol)
pre-dissolved in Et2O/anisole mixture was added slowly via a cannula to
the reaction mixture containing 6 (formed in situ) at ꢀ20 °C for 20 min and
then warmed to 0 °C and stirred further for 1 h. Upon completion of the
reaction, the mixture was quenched with satd NH4Cl solution, extracted in
Et2O, washed with H2O, dried and evaporated to dryness. The product was
purified by column chromatography using hexanes/EtOAc 1:9 as eluent. The
appropriate fractions were pooled together to furnish compound
7 as a
foam (0.95 g, 55%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.70 (s, 1H), 8.15 (s, 1H),
7.11–7.62 (m, 15H), 5.60–5.80 (m, 6H), 4.42–4.71 (m, 5H), 4.15 (s, 3H,
OMe), 3.90 (dd, 1H).
22. Compound 7 (0.25 g, 0.43 mmol) was dissolved in DCM (10 mL) followed by
slow addition of BBr3 (0.16 mL, 1.75 mmol) and stirred at rt for 2 h. Upon
completion of the reaction (as indicated by TLC) the reaction mixture was
neutralized with solid NaHCO3. The solids were filtered and the filtrate was
concentrated. The crude was taken directly to the next step without any
further purification.
nantly gave the undesired a-anomer as the major product. This re-
sult was further supported by molecular modelling studies of
compound 11. The best anomeric ratio was obtained using BH3–
23. Compound 8 (87 mg, 0.3 mmol) was dissolved in DMF (5 mL) followed by
addition of BH3–Me2S (39
lL, 0.6 mmol) and stirred for 1 h. Workup of the
reaction furnished 9 which was then hydrolyzed using MeOH/concd HCl (1:1,
Me2S reagent to give 12 with b/
a anomeric ratio of 2:1 (Table 1,