2508
J. Gangopadhyay et al. / Polyhedron 28 (2009) 2503–2509
nous reducing agents like hydrazine sulphate and hydroxylamine
hydrochloride. Rate measurements for 2!1 conversion reveal an
associative pathway and on that basis reaction mechanism is pro-
posed. The reduction mode explains the role of variable metal va-
lence in proton mediated structural changes of the bound amide
ligand in 2. The oxo complex (6) does not respond to such imine?
amide oxidation owing to considerably high metal oxidation
potential.
(cmꢁ1): 325, 335 (Re–Cl), 1595 (C@N). 1H NMR [d (J/Hz), CDCl3
solution]: L, 9.40(H(1), d, 5.5); 6.86 (H(2), t, 7.4); 7.96 (H(3), t,
8.2); 7.33 (H(4), d, 7.3); 6.41(H(6), s); 7.46–7.57 (H(8,9,11,12),
m); 16.08 (NH2, s); NC6H4CH3, 7.06 (2H(o), d, 5.5); 7.15 (2H(m),
d, 5.4); 4.04 (CH3, s).
1b: Anal. Calc. for C18H16Cl3N4Re: C, 37.21; H, 2.75; N, 9.65.
Found: C, 37.23; H, 2.78; N, 9.63. UV–vis (kmax, nm (e
, Mꢁ1
cmꢁ1), CH2Cl2 solution): 735 (1500); 540 (7500); 325 (13300). IR
(cmꢁ1): 320, 335 (Re–Cl), 1600 (C@N). 1H NMR [d (J/Hz), CDCl3
solution]: L, 9.42(H(1), d, 5.5); 6.85 (H(2), t, 7.5); 7.99 (H(3), t,
8.1); 7.35 (H(4), d, 7.2); 6.40(H(6), s); 7.45–7.50 (H(8,9,11,12),
m); 16.05 (NH2, s); NC6H5, 7.09 (2H(o), d, 5.9); 7.13 (2H(m), t,
6.6); 7.19 (1H(p), t, 6.3).
Electroactive complexes of type 2 display ReVI/ReV and ReVII
/
ReVI voltammetric signals near ꢀ0.1 and ꢀ1.6 V in contrast to only
one ReVI/ReV couple (ꢀ0.95 V) for 1. The appearance of ReVII/ReVI
response for 2 implies superior stabilizing effect of amide group
for higher valent rhenium species. Type 2 complexes uniformly ex-
hibit one electron paramagnetism and display well-resolved six
lines EPR spectra at room temperature in solution.
1a: Anal. Calc. for C18H15Cl4N4Re: C, 35.12; H, 2.44; N, 9.10.
Found: C, 35.17; H, 2.41; N, 9.06. UV–vis (kmax, nm (e
, Mꢁ1
cmꢁ1), CH2Cl2 solution): 735 (1500); 540 (7600); 325 (13200). IR
(cmꢁ1): 320, 335 (Re–Cl), 1595 (C@N). 1H NMR [d (J/Hz), CDCl3
solution]: L, 9.39(H(1), d, 5.8); 6.83 (H(2), t, 7.5); 7.97 (H(3), t,
8.2); 7.34 (H(4), d, 7.4); 6.42(H(6), s); 7.44–7.53 (H(8,9,11,12),
m); 16.06 (NH2, s); NC6H4Cl, 7.05 (2H(o), d, 5.8); 7.12 (2H(m), d,
5.6).
4. Experimental
4.1. Materials and physical measurements
The starting materials [Re(NC6H4Y)Cl3(PPh3)2] [40] and [Re-
OCl3(PPh3)2] [41] and the ligand L [42] were synthesized by re-
ported standard methods. All other chemicals were of reagent
grade and used as received. Solvents were dried and distilled prior
to use. The IR spectra were recorded on KBr pellets with a Perkin–
Elmer FT-IR spectrometer. A Perkin–Elmer 2400 II elemental ana-
lyzer was used for microanalysis. The electronic spectra and kinetic
studies were done using Hitachi U-3501 spectrophotometer fitted
with thermostated cell compartments. Electrochemical measure-
ments were performed using a PAR model Versastat-2 electro-
4.2.2. Synthesis of [ReVI(NC6H4Y)Cl3(C12H10N3O)], 2
The same general method was used to prepare the above com-
plexes from [ReV(NC6H4Y)Cl3(C12H11N3)], 1. Procedural details are
given for one representative case (2d). Yields are in the range
75–80%.
One hundred and two milligrams (0.17 mmol) of 1d was dis-
solved in 25 ml acetonitrile, and 4.5 ml 1(N) nitric acid (acidity
ꢀ0.15 N) was added. The violet solution was stirred for 1 h, during
which the colour turned yellowish brown. Solvent evaporation
yields dark brown product. The mass thus obtained was thor-
oughly washed with cold water to remove adherent nitric acid
and finally dried in vacuum over fused CaCl2. Yield: 80 mg (77%).
Anal. Calc. for C19H17Cl3N4O2Re: C, 36.45; H, 2.72; N, 8.95. Found:
chemical analyzer, with
a platinum working electrode. The
supporting electrolyte was tetraethylammonium perchlorate
(TEAP), and the potentials were referenced to saturated calomel
electrode (SCE) without junction correction. X-band EPR spectra
in solution and frozen glass states were recorded using a Bruker
300E spectrometer. Magnetic susceptibilities were measured on a
PAR 155 vibrating sample magnetometer.
C, 36.40; H, 2.75; N, 8.99. UV–vis (kmax, nm (e
, Mꢁ1 cmꢁ1), CH2Cl2
solution): 535 (1600); 355 (12200). IR (cmꢁ1): 320, 335 (Re–Cl),
1595 (C@N), 1635 (C@O).
4.2. Preparation of complexes
2c: Anal. Calc. for C19H17Cl3N4ORe: C, 37.41; H, 2.79; N, 9.19.
Found: C, 37.45; H, 2.75; N, 9.22. UV–vis (kmax, nm (e
, Mꢁ1
4.2.1. Synthesis of [ReV(NC6H4Y)Cl3(C12H11N3)], 1
cmꢁ1), CH2Cl2 solution): 535 (1600); 355 (12000). IR (cmꢁ1): 320,
335 (Re–Cl), 1595 (C@N), 1635 (C@O).
The same general procedure was used to synthesize the above
complexes from [ReV(NC6H4Y)Cl3(PPh3)2]. Procedural details are
given for one representative case (1d). Yields varied in the range
80–85%.
2b: Anal. Calc. for C18H15Cl3N4ORe: C, 36.27; H, 2.52; N, 9.40.
Found: C, 36.30; H, 2.57; N, 9.33. UV–vis (kmax, nm (e
, Mꢁ1
cmꢁ1), CH2Cl2 solution): 535 (1600); 355 (12300). IR (cmꢁ1): 325,
335 (Re–Cl), 1595 (C@N), 1635 (C@O).
To a green suspension of [ReV(NC6H4Y)Cl3(PPh3)2] (190 mg,
0.20 mmol) in 30 ml of benzene was added 60 mg (0.30 mmol) of
L in 10 ml of benzene, and the mixture was heated to reflux for
2 h, affording a violet solution. The solvent was then removed un-
der reduced pressure, and the dark mass thus obtained was
subjected to chromatography on a silica gel column (25 ꢄ 1 cm,
60–120 mesh). Excess ligand and phosphine was eluted with ben-
zene. A violet band was then eluted with benzene-acetonitrile
(20:1) mixture. Solvent removal form the eluate under reduced
pressure afforded [ReV(NC6H4OCH3)Cl3(L)], 1d as a violet solid.
Yield: 106 mg (82%). Anal. Calc. for C19H18Cl3N4ORe: C, 37.35; H,
2.95; N, 9.17. Found: C, 37.30; H, 2.98; N, 9.13. UV–vis (kmax, nm
2a: Anal. Calc. for C18H14Cl4N4ORe: C, 34.28; H, 2.22; N, 8.89.
Found: C, 34.32; H, 2.25; N, 8.81. UV–vis (kmax, nm (e
, Mꢁ1
cmꢁ1), CH2Cl2 solution): 535 (1500); 355 (12400). IR (cmꢁ1): 320,
330 (Re–Cl), 1595 (C@N), 1635 (C@O).
4.2.3. Synthesis of 1 from 2
4.2.3.1. Hydrazine method. To
a yellow–brown solution of 2
(125 mg, 0.20 mmol) in acetonitrile (25 ml) was added hydrazine
sulphate (91 mg, 0.70 mmol) in 10 ml solvent. It was then stirred
for 1.5 h at room temperature whereupon the solution gradually
turned violet. The solvent was removed from the resulting solution
under reduced pressure. The obtained violet mass (1) was washed
with cold water to free adhered hydrazine and dried in vacuum
over fused CaCl2. Yield: 100 mg (82%).
(e
, Mꢁ1 cmꢁ1), CH2Cl2 solution): 735 (1500); 540 (7500); 325
(13200). IR (cmꢁ1): 320, 335 (Re–Cl), 1595 (C@N). 1H NMR [d (J/
Hz), CDCl3 solution]: L, 9.41(H(1), d, 5.5); 6.84 (H(2), t, 7.5); 7.98
(H(3), t, 8.4); 7.34 (H(4), d, 7.7); 6.41(H(6), s); 7.45–7.55
(H(8,9,11,12), m); 16.06 (NH2, s); NC6H4OCH3, 7.08 (2H(o), d,
5.3); 7.13 (2H(m), d, 5.4); 3.99 (OCH3, s).
4.2.3.2. Hydroxylamine method. To a yellow–brown solution of 2
(125 mg, 0.20 mmol) in acetonitrile (25 ml) was added hydroxyl-
amine hydrochloride (28 mg, 0.40 mmol) in 5 ml solvent. It was
then stirred for 8 h at room temperature. The solvent was removed
from the resulting solution under reduced pressure. The obtained
1c: Anal. Calc. for C19H18Cl3N4Re: C, 38.35; H, 3.03; N, 9.42.
Found: C, 38.31; H, 2.99; N, 9.37. UV–vis (kmax, nm (
e
, Mꢁ1
cmꢁ1), CH2Cl2 solution): 735 (1500); 540 (7500); 330 (13400). IR