imparted by acrylate equivalent 1 in other transformations10
and stimulated by the simplicity of the approach, the present
investigation was initiated by studying the behavior of 1
during conjugate addition of nitroethane.
Scheme 1. Conjugate Addition of Nitroalkanes to Michael
Acceptors As a Route to Remote Functionalization
Compound 1 is readily accessible in gram quantities from
camphor, one of the cheapest chiral raw materials available
in bulk, and has been shown to be activated by added acid,
either Brønsted acid,10a Lewis acid,10b or combined Lewis
acid-molecular sieves (MS).10c However, none of these
conditions was effective for the target reaction (Table 1,
acceptors and usually provide mixtures of syn/anti isomers
in nearly 1:1 ratio, epimeric at Cγ.5,7 On the other hand, the
alternative approach, which relies on chiral acryloyl systems
covalently bound to the corresponding auxiliary, tends to
provide unsatisfactory levels of stereocontrol as a conse-
quence of the distance (4 chemical bonds away) between
the chiral inductor and the newly formed stereocenter.8,9
Here we describe the first realization of highly stereose-
lective conjugate addition of unmodified prochiral nitroal-
kanes to acrylate systems based on an intriguing double
catalytic activation of substrates.
Table 1. Catalyst Screening for the 1,4-Addition of Nitroethane
(2a, R ) CH3) to 1a
entry
acid
TfOH
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Mg(OTf)2
base
additive t (h)
dr
conv. (%)
1
2
24
24
0
0
It was argued that in order to get satisfactory levels of
remote stereocontrol in the approach depicted in Scheme 2,
3
4
4 Å MS
4 Å MS
24
18
0b
0
5
6
7
8
i-Pr2NEt
NMP
24 59/41
24 52/48
24 55/45
98
>99b
50
Cu(OTf)2 i-Pr2NEt
Cu(OTf)2 i-Pr2NEt 4 Å MS
Cu(OTf)2 Et3N
Cu(OTf)2 NMP
Cu(OTf)2 NMP
NMP
4
1
1
1
80/20
88/12
97/3
>99
>99
>99
>99b
90b
>99b
Scheme 2. Challenging Remote Stereocontrol in Conjugate
9
4 Å MS
4 Å MS
4 Å MS
Addition of Nitroalkanes to Chiral Acrylates
10
11
12
13
90/10
4 Å MS 120 60/40
Cu(OTf)2 NMP
18 50/50
a Ratio of 1/2a/acid/base ) 1:5:0.2:0.4 as applicable; loading of
powdered 4 Å MS ) 100 mg/mmol of 1. b Reaction run at rt. NMP )
N-methylpiperidine.
auxiliary groups (Xc) displaying strong steric shielding would
be required. Given the high level of asymmetric induction
entries 1-4). It was then found that base-promoted activation
of the pronucleophilic nitroalkane was effective, although
the reaction to afford 3a was totally unselective with all
tertiary amines tested (entries 5 and 6). These results suggest
once again that for full realization of the stereodiscriminating
power of reagent 1, conformational restriction of the ketol
(3) For a review on conjugate additions of nitrocompounds, see: Ballini,
R.; Bosica, G.; Fiorini, D.; Palmieri, A.; Petrini, M. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105,
933–971
.
(4) For reviews on asymmetric conjugate additions covering metal
catalysis, see: (a) Sibi, M. P.; Manyem, S. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 8033–
8061. Covering organocatalysis: (b) Tsogoeva, S. B. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2007, 1701–1716. (c) Almasi, D.; Alonso, D. A.; Na´jera, C. Tetrahedron
Asymmetry 2007, 18, 299–365. (d) Vicario, J. L.; Bad´ıa, D.; Carrillo, L.
Synthesis 2007, 2065–2092.
(6) Conjugate additions of prochiral nitroalkanes to non-carbonyl
Michael acceptors promoted by bifunctional thiourea organocatalysts. To
nitroalkenes: (a) Rabalakos, C.; Wulff, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
13524–13525. (b) Dong, X.-Q.; Teng, H.-L.; Wang, C.-J. Org. Lett. 2009,
11, 1265–1268. To vinyl sulfones: (c) Zhu, Q.; Lu, Y. Org. Lett. 2009, 11,
1721–1724.
(5) Iminium ion mediated additions to enals: (a) Zu, L.; Xie, H.; Li, H.;
Wang, J.; Wang, W. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 2660–2664. (b) Gotoh,
H.; Ishikawa, H.; Hayashi, Y. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5397–5309. (c) Hojabri,
L.; Hartikka, A.; Moghaddam, F. M.; Arvidsson, P. I. AdV. Synth. Catal.
2007, 349, 740–748. (d) Wang, Y.; Li, P.; Liang, X.; Zhang, T. Y.; Ye, J.
Chem. Commun. 2008, 1232–1234. Bifunctional thiourea-catalyzed additions
to unsaturated N-acyl pyrroles: (e) Vakulya, B.; Varga, S.; Soo´s, T. J. Org.
Chem. 2008, 73, 3475–3480. Diphenylprolinol-catalyzed cross-conjugate
additions between nitroalkenes and enals: (f) Zhong, C.; Chen, Y.; Petersen,
J. L.; Akhmedov, N. G.; Shi, X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2009, 48, 1279–
1282. Iminium ion mediated additions to enones: (g) Dong, L.-t.; Lu, R.-j.;
Du, Q.-s.; Zhang, J.-m.; Liu, S.-p.; Xuan, Y.-n.; Yan, M. Tetrahedron 2009,
65, 4124–4129. For methods involving ꢀ-unsubstituted vinyl ketones that
provide from poor to moderate ee, see the following. Al-catalyzed addition
of nitroesters: (h) Keller, E.; Veldman, N.; Spek, A. L.; Feringa, B. L.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 3403–3413. Peptide-catalyzed additions
of R-nitroketones: (i) Linton, B. R.; Reutershand, R. H.; Aderman, C. M.;
Richardson, E. A.; Brownell, K. R.; Ashley, C. W.; Evans, C. A.; Miller,
S. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 1993–1997.
(7) For exceptions using preformed silyl nitronates, see: (a) Ooi, T.;
Doda, K.; Maruoka, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9022–9023. (b) Ooi,
T.; Fujioka, S.; Maruoka, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11790–11791.
(8) For a review on remote stereocontrol, see: Mikami, K.; Shimizu,
M.; Zhang, H.-C.; Maryanoff, B. E. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 2917–2951.
(9) For conjugate addition of prochiral nitroalkanes (R * H) to selected
chiral acrylate systems, leading to 70:30 or lower dr, see: Ballini, R.; Fiorini,
D.; Palmieri, A.; Petrini, M. Lett. Org. Chem. 2004, 1, 335–339.
(10) (a) Palomo, C.; Oiarbide, M.; Garc´ıa, J. M.; Gonza´lez, A.;
Lecumberri, A.; Linden, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10288–10289.
(b) Palomo, C.; Oiarbide, M.; Arceo, E.; Garc´ıa, J. M.; Lo´pez, R.; Gonza´lez,
A.; Linden, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6187–6190. (c) Palomo,
C.; Oiarbide, M.; Garc´ıa, J. M.; Ban˜uelos, P.; Odriozola, J. M.; Razkin, J.;
Linden, A. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 2637–2640.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 17, 2009
3827