4454
M. Ishikawa et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 4450–4454
10. Daniewski, A. R.; Liu, W.; Radinov, R. N. WO Patent 2007/115968.
11. McKerrecher, D.; Allen, J. V.; Caulkett, P. W. R.; Donald, C. S.; Fenwick, M. L.;
Grange, E.; Johnson, K. M.; Johnstone, C.; Jones, C. D.; Pike, K. G.; Rayner, J. W.;
Walker, R. P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 2705.
12. Nishimura, T.; Iino, T.; Mitsuya, M.; Bamba, M.; Watanabe, H.; Tsukahara, D.;
Kamata, K.; Sasaki, K.; Ohyama, S.; Hosaka, H.; Futamura, M.; Nagata, Y.; Eiki, J.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 1357.
13. Mitsuya, M.; Kamata, K.; Bamba, M.; Watanabe, H.; Sasaki, Y.; Sasaki, K.;
Ohyama, S.; Hosaka, H.; Nagata, Y.; Eiki, J.; Nishimura, T. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 2009, 19, 2718.
14. Kamata, K.; Mitsuya, M.; Nishimura, T.; Eiki, J. I.; Nagata, Y. Structure 2004, 12,
429.
15. Kelly, T. A.; Fuchs, V. U.; Perry, C. W.; Snow, R. J. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 1009.
16. Sharghi, H.; Asemani, O.; Khalifeh, R. Synth. Commun. 2008, 38, 1128.
17. EC50 values were designated as concentration of compounds which give half of
maximal increased enzymatic activities of glucokinase by the compound at
2.5 mM glucose. Compound 3 was used an internal control across all assay
16p(R) which showed significant in vivo glucose lowering efficacy
in rat OGTT model. The predicted binding mode by molecular mod-
elling and our modification results on lead compound 5a suggested
that the 2-pyridyl-benzimidazole pharmacophore would be an
alternative allosteric GKA instead of the heteroaromatic amide
template. Co-crystal structure analysis of benzimidazole deriva-
tives with GK protein are underway to confirm the binding mode
of this novel structure class of GKAs, and further modification re-
sults on this series to improve GK potency will be reported in
due course.
Acknowledgement
plates for data validation. The EC50 value of compound 3 is 0.42 0.09 lM.
Detailed assay methods and conditions are described in Ref. 18.
We would like to acknowledge the contributions of colleagues
in biochemistry, pharmacology and pharmacokinetics in generat-
ing and interpreting the data reported in this communication.
We thank Yukari Tachibana for the binding mode prediction of
GKAs.
18. Futamura, M.; Hosaka, H.; Kadotani, A.; Shimazaki, H.; Sasaki, K.; Ohyama, S.;
Nishimura, T.; Eiki, J.; Nagata, Y. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 37668.
19. The maximal activating response was defined as Emax equal to 100% efficacy of
compound 3 and the maximal response of test compounds was compared to
that of compound 3.
20. Human microsomal stability was determined by % parent compound (1 lM)
remaining after 30 min (37 °C) incubation with human liver microsomes
(0.25 mg protein/ml).
References and notes
21. Shibata, Y.; Takahashi, H.; Ishii, Y. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2000, 28,
1518.
1. Printz, R. L.; Magnuson, M. A.; Granner, D. K. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1993, 13, 463.
2. Matschinsky, F. M. Diabetes 1996, 45, 223.
22. The racemic 14b was optically resolved using chiral HPLC (CHIRALCEL AD-H,
2 cm  25 cm, n-hexane/iPrOH (9:1) with 0.1% Et2NH, flow rate = 5 mL/min) to
give optically pure enantiomers 14b(R) and 14b(S), respectively. Chiral
analytical HPLC indicated that enantiomeric excess (ee) of each enantiomer
was >99% (CHIRALCEL AD-H, 0.46 cm  25 cm, n-hexane/iPrOH (9:1) with 0.1%
Et2NH, flow rate = 0.4 mL/min, tR = 11.5 min for 14b(R), 23.7 min for 14b(S).
23. Campos, K. R.; Klapars, A.; Waldman, J. H.; Dormer, P. G.; Chen, C. Y. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3538.
3. Matschinsky, F. M.; Glaser, B.; Magnuson, M. A. Diabetes 1998, 47, 307.
4. Sarabu, R.; Grimsby, J. Curr. Opin. Drug Disc. Dev. 2005, 8, 631.
5. Castelhano, A. L.; Dong, H. Q.; Fyfe, M. C. T.; Gardner, L. S.; Kamikozawa, Y.;
Kurabayashi, S.; Nawano, M.; Ohashi, R.; Procter, M. J.; Qiu, L.; Rasamison, C.
M.; Schofield, K. L.; Shah, V. K.; Ueta, K.; Williams, G. M.; Witter, D.; Yasuda, K.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 1501.
6. McKerrecher, D.; Allen, J. V.; Bowker, S. S.; Boyd, S.; Caulkett, P. W. R.; Currie, G.
S.; Davies, C. D.; Fenwick, M. L.; Gaskin, H.; Grange, E.; Hargreaves, R. B.; Hayter,
B. R.; James, R.; Johnson, K. M.; Johnstone, C.; Jones, C. D.; Lackie, S.; Rayner, J.
W.; Walker, R. P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 2103.
24. Klapars, A.; Campos, K. R.; Waldman, J. H.; Zewge, D.; Dormer, P. G.; Chen, C. Y.
J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4986.
25. Eight-week old male Wistar rats were fasted overnight before performing the
test. The rats were orally administered compound 16p(R) or vehicle alone
(0.5% methylcellulose solution) followed 30 min later by an oral glucose
challenge (2 g/kg). Blood glucose concentrations were measured by OneTouch
Ultra (LifeScan, Inc., Milpitas, CA) just prior to and following the glucose
challenge (30, 60, 90 and 120 min). AUC values were calculated from the data
(from À30 min to 120 min).
7. Guertin, K. R.; Grimsby, J. Curr. Med. Chem. 2006, 13, 1839.
8. Sarabu, R.; Berthel, S. J.; Kester, R. F.; Tilley, J. W. Expert Opin. Ther. Patents 2008,
18, 759.
9. Bertram, L. S.; Black, D.; Briner, P. H.; Chatfield, R.; Cooke, A.; Fyfe, M. C. T.;
Murray, P. J.; Naud, F.; Nawano, M.; Procter, M. J.; Rakipovski, G.; Rasamison, C.
M.; Reynet, C.; Schofield, K. L.; Shah, V. K.; Spindler, F.; Taylor, A.; Turton, R.;
Williams, G. M.; Wong-Kai-In, P.; Yasuda, K. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 4340.