4342
W. Sun et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 4339–4342
6. Lu, Y-F.; Santostefano, M.; Cunningham, B. D. M.; Threadgill, M. D.; Safe, S.
Biochem. Pharmacol. 1996, 51, 1077.
7. Gambone, C. J.; Hutcheson, J. M.; Gabriel, J. L.; Beard, R. L.; Chandraratna, R. A.
S.; Soprano, K. J.; Soprano, D. R. Mol. Pharmacol. 2002, 61, 334.
8. Sun, W.; Desai, S.; Piao, H.; Carroll, P.; Canney, D. J. Heterocycles 2007, 71, 557.
9. Bodwell, G. J.; Hawco, K. M.; da Silva, R. P. Synlett 2003, 2, 179.
10. Adam, W.; Bialas, J.; Hadjiarapoglou, L. Chem. Ber. 1991, 124, 2377.
11. Adger, B. J.; Barrett, C.; Brennan, J.; McGuigan, P.; McKervey, M. A.; Tarbit, B. J.
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993, 1220.
12. Dalcanale, E.; Montanari, F. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 567.
13. Renaud, J. P.; Rochel, N.; Ruff, M.; Vivat, V.; Chambon, P.; Gronemeyer, H.;
Moras, D. Nature 1995, 681.
14. Zhang, Z-P.; Shukri, M.; Bambone, C. J.; Gabriel, J. L.; Soprano, K. J.; Soprano, D.
R. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2000, 380, 339.
15. 7-(4-Oxo-4H-chromen-3-yl)-hepta-2,4,6-trienoic acid methyl ester (trans isomer)
(5). To a chilled (À78 °C) solution of compound 3 (0.5 g, 1 mmol) in dry THF
(15 mL) under N2 was added n-butyllithium (2 M in heptane, 0.75 mL,
1.5 mmol) with stirring. After 30 min, aldehyde 4 (0.12 g, 0.86 mmol) in dry
THF (5 mL) was added dropwise. After stirring at À78 °C for an additional
30 min, the resulting mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and
stirred overnight. The reaction was quenched with saturated aqueous NH4Cl
and extracted with EtOAc (15 mL Â 3). The organic layer was washed with
brine, dried over MgSO4, concentrated and purified by flash chromatography
(silica gel; 3:1, hexane/EtOAc) to afford a mixture of trans and cis isomers (1:1
based on NMR) (0.18 g, 74%). A solution of trans and cis isomers in EtOAc and
hexane (15 mL; 5:1) was allowed to evaporate gradually at room temperature.
Compound 5 precipitated as pale yellow crystals: mp 115–117 °C; 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3): d 8.28 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.04 (s, 1H), 7.68 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H),
7.33–7.56 (m, 4H), 6.67 (dd, J = 14.8, 10.8 Hz, 1H), 6.55 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 6.47
(dd, J = 14.8, 10.8 Hz, 1H), 5.93 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 3.76 (s, 3H).
Figure 4. Ortep drawing of compound 14.
a tetramethylcyclohexyl-chromone-based aldehyde yielded an ole-
finic ester with s-cis geometry similar to ATRA.16,17 Crystal struc-
tures obtained for two key precursors aided the interpretation of
binding data.18 A novel chromone-based ligand was identified as
a lead for the development of future RAR. Molecular modification
of chromone-based acid 15 is underway in an effort to develop
subtype selective RAR ligands.19
16. (E)-2-methyl-3-(6,6,9,9-tetramethyl-4-oxo-6,7,8,9-tetrahydro-4H-benzo[g]chro-
men-3-yl)acrylaldehyde (13). An oven-dried flask was flushed with N2 and
charged with 12 (0.134 g, 0.47 mmol) and 2-(triphenylphosphoranylidene)
propionaldehyde (0.605 g, 1.88 mmol) in 10 mL of CH2Cl2. The resulting
mixture was stirred at room temperature under N2 for 48 h. The mixture was
condensed under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by flash
chromatography to yield 13 (0.11 g, 72%) 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) d: 9.65 (s,
1H), 8.21 (s, 1H), 8.19 (s, 1H), 7.52 (s, 1H), 7.41 (s, 1H), 2.01 (s, 2H), 1.75 (s,
2H), 1.37 (s, 6H), 1.35 (s, 6H).
17. Attempts to transform aldehyde 13 to a phosphorous ylide (see synthesis of 3
and 9 above) failed. Under Wittig reaction conditions, no reaction occurred
between 3-formylchromones and 2-(triphenylphosphoranylidene)propional-
dehyde.
18. Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for compounds 10 and 14 in
this Letter have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data
Centre as supplementary publication numbers CCDC 283693 (for 10) and
722736 (for 14). Copies of the data can be obtained, free of charge, on
application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK [fax: +44 (0)1223-
336033 or e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk].
Acknowledgements
Dr. Jerome Gabriel is acknowledged for molecular modeling
data utilized in the design of ligands. The authors thank Shyam De-
sai for providing precursor 12. D.J.C. and W.S. are grateful to Wyeth
Research, the Pennsylvania Department of Health, and Temple Uni-
versity, School of Pharmacy for generous financial support. WS
thanks Dr. Jeffrey Pelletier, Wyeth Research, for valuable remarks
regarding the manuscript and Yanlong Kang, Sloan-Kettering Can-
cer Center, for assistance with Figure 2.
References and notes
1. Mark, M.; Ghyselinck, N. B.; Chambon, P. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2006, 46,
451.
19. The hydrolysis of chromone-based esters (5 and 14) under alkaline or acidic
conditions was challenging due to the instability of the chromone nucleus (see:
Kona, J.; Fabian, W.M.F.; Zahradnik, P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2001, 422).
No effort was made to optimize yields here but methods are available that
report higher yields (for example see; He, X.; Li, Z.; You, Q. Synth. Commun.
2002, 32, 709).
2. Germain, P.; Chambon, P.; Eichele, G.; Evans, R. M.; Lazar, M. A.; Leid, M.; De
Lera, A. R.; Lotan, R.; Mangelsdorf, D. J.; Gronemeyer, H. Pharmacol. Rev. 2006,
58, 712.
3. Aucci, L.; Gronemeyer, H. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2001, 1, 181.
4. Degos, L.; Wang, Z. Y. Oncogene 2001, 20, 7140.
5. Larson, R. S.; Tallman, M. S. Best Practice Res. Clin. Haematol. 2003, 16, 453.