V. Nagy et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 17 (2009) 5696–5707
5703
4.3.6. 1-S-(Z)-Isonicotinoyl-hydroximoyl-1-thio-b-
glucopyranose 2i
A solution composed of 1i (90 mg, 0.18 mmol) in a mixture of
MeOH (2 mL), water (2 mL) and NEt3 (0.4 mL) was treated accord-
ing to general procedure B. The residue was purified (RP-18: water)
to afford 2i (53 mg, 0.16 mmol, 90% yield) as a white solid.
D
-
170.4, 169.6, 169.29, 169.26, (4s, CH3CO), 154.5 (C@N), 132.6 (s,
2C, CH-ar), 131.2, 128.4 (s, 2C, CH-ar), 123.3 (C-1), 117.7, 115.1
(C„N), 70.84 (C-2 or C-3), 70.80 (C-5), 67.9 (C-2 or C-3), 67.3 (C-
4), 60.9 (C-6), 20.6 (CH3CO), 20.4 (s, 3C, CH3CO); MS (ESI >0) m/
z = 529.0 [M+Na]+, 1034.5 [2M+Na]+; HRMS (ESI > 0) m/z =
C22H22N2NaO10S [M+Na]+ calcd 529.0893, found 529.0898.
Rf = 0.48 (EtOAc/MeOH, 4:1); ½a D20
ꢂ
– 1.6 (c 1, H2O); mp = 140 °C
darkening, 175 °C decomposition; 1H NMR (300 MHz, D2O) d 8.62
(dd, 2H, J = 1.5 and 5.5 Hz, H-ar), 7.57 (dd, 2H, H-ar), 4.33 (d, 1H,
J = 9.8 Hz, H-1), 3.60 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4 and 12.7 Hz, H-6), 3.52 (dd,
1H, J = 4.9 Hz, H-60), 3.40 (t, 2H, J = 9.2 Hz, H-2), 3.31 (t, 1H,
J = 9.0 Hz, H-4), 3.25 (t, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz, H-3), 2.75 (ddd, 1H, H-5);
13C NMR (75 MHz, D2O) d 152.7 (C@N), 149.6 (s, 2C, CH-ar),
141.6, 124.3 (s, 2C, CH-ar), 83.1 (C-1), 80.3 (C-5), 77.3 (C-3), 72.5,
4.4.4. (1S)-2,3,4,6-Tetra-O-acetyl-1,5-anhydro-D-glucitol-
spiro[1.5]-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1,4,2-oxathiazole (1S)-3e
A solution composed of 1d (690 mg, 1.34 mmol) and NBS
(478 mg, 2.68 mmol)wastreatedaccordingto thegeneralprocedure
C to afford a first crop of pure (1S)-3e (372 mg) as a white foam and
an additional crop (218 mg) of a mixture of (1S)-3e and (1R)-3e in a
45:55 ratio, respectively, (1H NMR). The calculated yields were,
respectively, 69% and 17% for the (1S)- and (1R)-epimers.
*
69.2 (2s, C-2, C-4), 60.5 (C-6); Anal. Calcd for C12H16N2O6S, 0.5
H2O: C, 44.30; H, 5.27; N, 8.61; O; 31.97; S, 9.86. Found: C,
44.34; H, 5.26; N, 8.62; O, 32.45.
Rf = 0.43 (PE/EtOAc, 3:2); ½a D20
ꢂ
+52 (c 1, CH2Cl2); 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.61 (d, 2H, J = 8.9 Hz, CH-ar), 6.94 (d, 2H,
J = 8.9 Hz, CH-ar), 5.62 (m, 2H, H-2 H-3), 5.26 (m, 1H, H-4), 4.41
(ddd, 1H, J = 2.0, 3.6 and 10.3 Hz, H-5), 4.34 (dd, 1H, J = 3.6 and
12.6 Hz, H-60), 4.07 (dd, 1H, J = 2.0 and 12.6 Hz, H-6), 3.85 (s, 3H,
OMe), 2.09, 2.08, 2.05, 2.03, (4s, 12H, CH3CO); 13C NMR (75 MHz,
CDCl3) d 170.6, 169.6, 169.5, 169.4 (4s, CH3CO), 162.2, 155.9
(C@N), 129.6 (s, 2C, CH-ar), 122.1 (C-1), 119.3, 114.3 (s, 2C, CH-
ar), 71.1 (C-2 or C-3), 70.5 (C-5), 67.9 (C-2 or C-3), 67.5 (C-4),
61.1 (C-6), 55.4 (OMe), 20.7 (CH3CO), 20.5 (s, 3C, CH3CO); MS
(ESI >0) m/z = 511.8 [M+H]+, 534.0 [M+Na]+, 1022.4 [2M+H]+,
1044.6 [2M+Na]+; HRMS (ESI >0) m/z = C22H25NNaO11S [M+Na]+
calcd 534.1046, found 534.1049.
4.4. Spiro-cyclization
4.4.1. (1S)- and (1R)-2,3,4,6-Tetra-O-acetyl-1,5-anhydro-D-
glucitol-spiro[1.5]-3-(phenyl)-1,4,2-oxathiazole (1S)-3a and
(1R)-3a
When the spiro-cyclization was carried out with 1a (278 mg) in
CHCl3 in the presence of NBS (2 equiv) and DBU (1 equiv) according
to the general procedure C, TLC suggested a ꢀ1:1 ratio of the (1S)/
(1R)-epimers. Separation by repeated column chromatographies
with a gradient of PE/EtOAc as the mobile phase afforded (1S)-3a
(44 mg, 16%) and (1R)-3a (51 mg, 18%).
4.4.5. (1R)-2,3,4,6-Tetra-O-acetyl-1,5-anhydro-D-glucitol-
4.4.2. (1S)-2,3,4,6-Tetra-O-acetyl-1,5-anhydro-
spiro[1.5]-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-1,4,2-oxathiazole (1S)-3b
D
-glucitol-
spiro[1.5]-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-1,4,2-oxathiazole (1R)-3f
Spiro-cyclization of 1f (580 mg) was attempted as before (NBS:
360 mg, 2 equiv; CHCl3, 25 mL) upon heating with a 60 W tungsten
lamp for 1 h. TLC showed that the transformation was not selec-
tive, yielding a multicomponent mixture. Workup and flash col-
umn chromatography (PE then PE/EtOAc 1:1) of the crude
product (827 mg) afforded four fractions (90, 33, 21, 41 mg). Only
the third one was pure enough and led to exploitable NMR spectra
(COSY, HSQC), concluding to the presence of (1R)-3f.
A solution composed of 1b (827 mg, 1.56 mmol) and NBS
(557 mg, 3.13 mmol)wastreatedaccordingtothegeneralprocedure
C to afford a first crop of pure (1S)-3b (259 mg) as a white foam and
an additional crop (144 mg) of a mixture of (1S)-3b and (1R)-3b in a
7:93 ratio, respectively, (1H NMR). The calculated yields were,
respectively, 33% and 16% for the (1S)- and (1R)-epimers.
Rf = 0.62 (PE/EtOAc, 3:2); ½a D20
ꢂ
+33 (c 1, CH2Cl2); 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.31 (d, 2H, J = 9.0 Hz, H-ar), 7.87 (d, 2H,
J = 9.0 Hz, H-ar), 5.64 (m, 2H, H-2 H-3), 5.29 (m, 1H, H-4), 4.44
(ddd, 1H, J = 2.1, 3.6 and 10.3 Hz, H-5), 4.35 (dd, 1H, J = 3.6 and
12.7 Hz, H-60), 4.10 (dd, 1H, J = 2.1 and 12.7 Hz, H-6), 2.05, 2.07,
2.09, 2.10 (4s, 12H, CH3CO); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) d 170.4
169.5, 169.3, 169.2, (4s, CH3CO), 154.4 (C@N), 149.3, 132.8, 128.8
(s, 2C, CH-ar), 124.1 (s, 2C, CH-ar), 123.4 (C-1), 70.9 (C-2 or C-3),
70.8 (C-5), 67.8 (C-2 or C-3), 67.2 (C-4), 60.9 (C-6), 20.6 (s, CH3CO),
20.4 (s, 3C, CH3CO); MS (ESI >0) m/z = 549.0 [M+Na]+, 1074.5
[2M+Na]+; HRMS (ESI >0) m/z = C21H22N2NaO12S [M+Na]+ calcd
549.0791, found 549.0792.
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 6.93 (s, 2H, CH-ar), 5.59 (d, 1H,
J = 10.2 Hz, H-2), 5.27 (t, 1H, H-4), 5.10 (dd, 1H, J = 9.5 and
10.2 Hz, H-3), 4.35 (dd, 1H, J = 3.3 and 12.3 Hz, H-6), 4.10 (m, 2H,
H-5 H-60), 3.90 (s, 9H, OMe), 2.08, 2.07 (2s, 6H, CH3CO), 2.05 (s,
6H, CH3CO); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) d 171.0, 170.3, 169.6,
168.9, (4s, CH3CO), 155.6 (C@N), 153.8 (s, 2C), 141.4, 127.4 (C-1),
122.8, 105.7 (s, 2C, CH-ar), 73.7 (C-3), 71.0 (C-5), 68.7 (C-2), 67.5
(C-4), 61.42 (C-6), 61.40 (OMe), 56.7 (s, 2C, OMe), 20.7 (CH3CO),
20.6 (s, 2C, CH3CO), 20.5 (CH3CO).
4.4.6. (1S)-2,3,4,6-Tetra-O-acetyl-1,5-anhydro-
spiro[1.5]-3-[(4-phenyl)-phenyl]-1,4,2-oxathiazole (1S)-3g
A solution composed of 1g (200 mg, 357 mol) and NBS
(127 mg, 715 mol) was treated according to the general proce-
D-glucitol-
4.4.3. (1S)-2,3,4,6-Tetra-O-acetyl-1,5-anhydro-
D
-glucitol-
l
spiro[1.5]-3-(4-cyanophenyl)-1,4,2-oxathiazole (1S)-3c
A solution composed of 1c (680 mg, 1.34 mmol) and NBS
(476 mg, 2.67 mmol) was treated according to the general proce-
dure C to afford a first crop of pure (1S)-3c (103 mg, 15%) as a white
foam and an additional crop (48 mg) of a mixture of (1S)-3c and
(1R)-3c in a 5:95 ratio, respectively, (1H NMR). The calculated
yields were, respectively, 15% and 7% for the (1S)- and (1R)-
epimers.
l
dure C to afford a first crop of pure (1S)-3g (65 mg) as a white foam
and an additional crop (90 mg) of a mixture of (1S)-3g and (1R)-3g
in a 3:2 ratio, respectively. The calculated yields were, respectively,
61% and 18% for the (1S)- and (1R)-epimers.
Rf = 0.52 (PE/EtOAc, 3:2); ½a D20
ꢂ
+45 (c 1, CH2Cl2); 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.74 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz, CH-ar), 7.65 (d, 2H,
J = 8.5 Hz, CH-ar), 7.57–7.63 (m, 2H, CH-ar), 7.37–7.50 (m, 3H,
CH-ar), 5.64 (m, 2H, H-2 H-3), 5.28 (m, 1H, H-4), 4.44 (ddd, 1H,
J = 2.0, 3.7 and 10.3 Hz, H-5), 4.36 (dd, 1H, J = 3.7 and 12.6 Hz, H-
60), 4.09 (dd, 1H, J = 2.0 and 12.6 Hz, H-6), 2.09, 2.06 (2s, 6H,
CH3CO), 2.04 (2s, 6H, CH3CO); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) d 170.5,
169.6, 169.5, 169.4 (4s, CH3CO), 156.1 (C@N), 144.5, 139.6, 128.9
(s, 2C, CH-ar), 128.4 (s, 2C, CH-ar), 128.1 (CH-ar), 127.5 (s, 2C,
Rf = 0.49 (PE/EtOAc, 3:2); ½a D20
ꢂ
+35 (c 1, CH2Cl2); 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.79 (d, 2H, J = 8.7 Hz, CH-ar), 7.74 (d, 2H,
J = 8.7 Hz, CH-ar), 5.28 (m, 1H, H-4), 5.64 (m, 2H, H-2 H-3), 4.44
(ddd, 1H, J = 2.1, 3.6 and 10.3 Hz, H-5), 4.33 (dd, 1H, J = 3.6 and
12.7 Hz, H-60), 4.10 (dd, 1H, J = 2.1 and 12.7 Hz, H-6), 2.09 (s, 6H,
CH3CO), 2.04, 2.06 (2s, 6H, CH3CO); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) d