874
LETTERS
SYNLETT
463, 281-322. Chem. Abstr. 1928, 22, 4499. q) Jaunin, R. Helv.
Chim. Acta 1956, 39, 111-116. r) Bachmann, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1931, 53, 2672-2676. s) Kalyanam, N.; Venkateswara Rao, G.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 1647-1648. t) Roskamp, E.J.,
Pedersen, S.F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 3152-3154.
u) Takaki, K.; Tsubaki, Y.; Tanaka, S.; Beppu, F.; Fujiwara, Y.
Chem. Lett. 1990, 203-204. v) Imamoto, T.; Nishimura, S. Chem.
Lett. 1990, 1141-1142. w) Enholm, E.J.; Forbes, D.C.; Holub, D.P.
Synth. Comm. 1990, 20, 981-987. x) Shono, T.; Kise, N.; Oike, H.;
Yoshimoto, M.; Okazaki, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 5559-
5562. y) Buchwald, S.L.; Watson, B.T.; Wannamaker, M.W.;
Dewan, J.C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 4486-4494.
(5) For a review see J. Boersma in Comprehensive Organometallic
Chemistry, Ed. G. Wilkinson, 1982, Vol 2, p. 823-851.
(6) Banerjee, A.K.; Sulbaran de Carrasco, M.C.; Frydrych-Houge, C.,
Motherwell, W.B., J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Comm. 1986, 1803-1805.
(7) Grignon-Dubois, M., Fialeix, M., Can. J. Chem. 1993, 71, 754.
(8) Zinc dust was purchased from Aldrich. Other sources of Zn work
equally well.
cases, the crude mixture was directly submitted to the isomerization
procedure described in the next article, in order to increase the amount
of the useful d,l diamine.
(9) The synthesis optically pure of N,N'-dimethyl-1,2-diphenyl-
ethane-1,2-diamine 2a, by this coupling procedure, isomerization
and resolution was submitted (and accepted) to Organic Syntheses
(procedure n° 2778).
Some interesting points should be commented on. An aromatic R
substituent should be preferred, since a cyclohexyl group gives rise to
extensive formation of reduction product (entry 10). The same is true
when a bulky isopropyl group is placed on the nitrogen (entry 9).
Although the usual trend gave an almost 1/1 ratio of the two
diastereomers, in two cases (entries 6 and 7) we observed an excess of
the d,l diamine and, with R = naphthyl, only the d,l isomer was detected.
(10 Typical procedure for 2d : A three necked round bottomed flask
(500 ml), was charged with Zn dust (325 mesh, 13.1 g, 0.2 mole)
and anhydrous acetonitrile (50 mL) under a nitrogen atmosphere.
The zinc was activated by the addition of dibromo-1,2-ethane
(~1.5 mL, 3.5 g, half a Pasteur pipette) and the mixture was
brought to reflux for 1 min, then allowed to cool to room
temperature. Then, a small amount of TMSCl (~3.2 mL, 2.5 g,
two Pasteur pipettes) was added, whereupon an evolution of
ethylene gas was observed. The mixture was stirred for 45 min
The above examples show that this method is relatively general. Despite
the formation of a 1/1 mixture of diastereomers, the ease of this
procedure is such that it is the preferred one in our laboratories for large
9, 10
scale preparations.
11
and then imine 1d (37.6 g, 0.2 mole) dissolved in acetonitrile
References and Notes
(100 mL) was added in one portion. Pure TMSCl (38 mL, 0.3
mole) was slowly added (30 min). The temperature increased so as
to maintain the internal temperature below +35-40°C. After 1h,
the mixture was cooled to 0°C and cautiously (very exothermic at
(1) Bennani Y.L., Hanessian S. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 3161-3195.
(2) Alexakis A., Mangeney P. in Advanced Asymmetric Synthesis, Ed.
G.R. Stephenson, Chapman & Hall, London, Chap. 5, 1996, 93-
110.
the beginning) hydrolyzed with a mixture of aq. NH OH (60 mL)
4
and of saturated aqueous solution of NH Cl (140 mL). The excess
4
(3) Anselmino, O. Chem. Ber. 1908, 41, 621-623.
Zn was removed by filtration, the organic layer was separated and
(4) a) Neumann, W.P.; Werner, F. Chem. Ber. 1978, 111, 3904-3911.
b) Thies, H.; Schönenberger, H.; Bauer, K.H. Arch. Pharm. 1958,
291/63, 373-375. Chem. Abstr. 1959, 53, 2127h. c) Baruah, B.;
Prajapati, D.; Sandhu, J.S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 6747-6750.
d) Nosek, J. Coll. Czech. Chem. Comm. 1967, 32, 2025-2028.
e) Betschart, C.; Seebach, D. Helv. Chim. Acta 1987, 70, 2215-
2231. f) Mangeney, P.; Tejero, T.; Alexakis, A.; Grosjean, F.;
Normant, J. Synthesis 1988, 255-257. g) Stühmer, W.; Messwrb,
G. Arch. Pharmaz. 1953, 286, 221-231. Chem. Abstr. 1955, 49,
6192b. h) Tanaka, H.; Dhimane, H.; Fujita, H.; Ikemoto, Y.; Torii,
S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 3811-3814. i) Khan, N.H.; Zuberi,
R.H.; Siddiqui, A.A. Synth. Comm. 1980, 10, 363-371. j) Smith,
J.G.; Boettger, T.J. Synth. Comm. 1981, 11, 61-64. k) Shimizu, M.;
Iida, T.; Fujisawa, T. Chem. Lett. 1995, 609-610. l) Smith, J.G.;
Veach, C.D. Can. J. Chem. 1966, 44, 2497-2502. m) Smith, J.G.;
Ho, I. J. Org. Chem. 1972, 37, 653-656. n) Eisch, J.J.; Kaska,
D.D.; Peterson, C.J. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31, 453-456. o) Schlenk,
W.; Appenrodt, J.; Michael, A.; Thal, A.. Chem. Ber 1914, 47,
473-490. p) Schlenk, W.; Bergmann, E. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1928,
the aqueous phase washed once with Et O (200 mL) and twice
2
with CH Cl (2x200 mL). The combined organic extracts were
2
2
dried over K CO . The salts were removed by filtration, washed
2
3
with Et O (50 ml) and the solvents removed on a rotatory
2
evaporator to afford a semi-solid residue (35-37 g, yield >95%).
This crude diamine is dissolved in absolute EtOH (700mL),
racemic tartaric acid (0.096 mol, 14.2 g) was added, and the
heterogeneous mixture is brought to reflux for 30 min. After
cooling to +20°C, the precipitate is collected by filtration and
washed twice with EtOH (2x50 mL). This salt was poured to a
mixture of 35% NaOH (60 mL), water (200 mL) and Et O (200
2
mL). After stirring for 30 min., the layers were separated, the
aqueous phase extracted twice with Et O (2x200 mL), and the
2
combined organic phases were dried over K CO . The solvents
2
3
11
are evaporated and the pure d,l diamine 2d is obtained in 44%
yield (16.5 g)
(11) Cuvinot, D.; Mangeney, P.; Alexakis, A.; Normant, J.F. J. Org.
Chem. 1989, 54, 2420-2425.