Hao et al.
Table 1: Physical data of the target compounds 2a–ja
R
X
N
OH OH
2+
Ca
R1
COO
R2
2
R3
20
c
No.
Formula
Mp (ꢀC)b
½aꢀD
MS ESI+(M + 1)
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
C50H46F6N2O8S2Ca
C60H54F2N2O12S4Ca
C52H56NO4S4Nae
C56H46F2N2O8S4Ca
C44H32F8N2O8S2Ca
C46H40F2N2Cl2O10S2Ca
C68H70F2N2O8S4Ca
C44H34Cl2F4N2O10Ca
C80H64N2O16Ca
118
152
118
136
174
174
206
190
140
146
+15.3
+3.0
1021.29
1201.33
888.34e
1081.26
973.10
993.15
1249.46
937.28
+18.2
)13.3
+10.8
+16.8
+7.0
2g
2h
2i
+20.2d
+13.9
+17.7d
1349.43
1053.44
2j
C56H44F4N2O12Ca
aThe definition of X, R, R1, R2, and R3 is the same as Figure 1.
bAll compounds melted with decomposition.
cThe optical values were measured in THF, c = 1.
dThe optical values were measured in THF ⁄ H2O = 2:1, c = 1.
eThe compound 2c was prepared as sodium salt, but the MS gave the molecular weight of the acid.
ESI, electrospray ionization.
Table 2: 1H NMR data of the target compounds 2a–j
No.
1H NMR (d; ppm) 400 MHz in DMSO-d6
2a
9.31 (s, 1H), 8.12–8.07 (m, 1H), 7.34–7.29 (m,1H), 7.16–7.05 (m, 4H), 6.77 (dd, 1H, J = 5.2, 16.4 Hz), 4.41–4.37 (m, 1H), 4.06–4.02
(m, 1H), 2.43–2.26 (m, 2H), 1.68–1.63 (m, 2H)
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
9.19 (m, 1H), 7.99 (d, J = 11.5 Hz), 7.61 (d, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.46–7.41 (m,1H), 7.28–7.06 (m, 5H), 6.78–6.67 (m,3H), 6.58–6.56
(m, 1H), 4.37–4.36 (m, 1H), 4.02 (m, 1H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 2.42–2.25 (m, 2H), 1.67–1.60 (m, 2H)
9.12 (s, 1H), 7.83 (s, 1H), 7.31–7.23 (m, 5H), 7.19–6.98 (m, 8H), 6.87–6.85 (m, 2H), 6.67–6.60 (m, 3H), 4.35–4.30 (m, 1H), 3.92–3.90
(m, 1H), 2.98–2.91 (m, 1H), 2.83–2.69 (m, 3H), 2.07–1.82 (m, 2H), 1.56–1.44 (m, 2H), 1.26–1.11 (m, 24H)
9.17 (s, 1H), 7.99 (d, 1H, J = 11.5 Hz), 7.59–7.51 (m, 5H), 7.28–7.08 (m, 6H), 6.71 (dd, 1H, J = 6.8, 15.0 Hz), 4.38–4.34
(m, 1H), 4.02–3.95 (m, 1H), 2.37–2.20 (m, 2H), 1.66–1.56 (m, 2H)
9.24 (s, 1H), 8.06–8.02 (m, 1H), 7.26–7.07 (m, 5H), 6.73 (dd, 1H, J = 5.2, 16.4 Hz), 4.41–4.36 (m, 1H), 3.95–3.91 (m, 1H), 2.22–2.03
(m, 2H), 1.65–1.52 (m, 2H)
9.23 (s, 1H), 8.03 (d, 1H, J = 10 Hz), 8.21 (d, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.22–6.51 (m, 5H),7.24 (d, 1H, J = 16 Hz), 4.40–4.38 (m, 1H),
4.03–3.95 (m, 1H), 3.64 (s, 3H), 2.24–2.05 (m, 2H), 1.64–1.53 (m, 2H)
2g
9.07 (s,1H), 7.93 (d, 1H, J = 11.2 Hz), 7.49–7.47 (m, 2H), 7.42–7.36 (m, 3H), 7.09–6.96(m, 4H), 6.67 (dd, 1H, J = 4.8, 16 Hz), 4.37–4.36
(m, 1H), 3.96–3.95 (m, 1H), 2.96–2.92 (m, 1H), 2.77–2.74 (m, 1H), 2.24–2.06 (m, 2H), 1.66–1.55 (m, 2H), 1.22 (d, 6H, J = 6.8 Hz),
1.09 (d, 6H, J = 6.8 Hz)
2h
9.25 (s, 1H), 8.30 (d, 1H, J = 6.8 Hz), 7.63 (d, 1H, J = 10 Hz), 7.17–7.13 (m, 2H), 6.93–6.75 (m, 2H), 6.72–6.65 (m, 2H), 4.31–4.27
(m, 1H), 3.97–3.91 (m, 1H), 2.36–2.19 (m, 2H), 1.63–1.52 (m, 2H)
2i
2j
9.09 (s, 1H), 7.31–7.21 (m, 7H), 7.13–6.62 (m, 14H), 4.28–4.24 (m, 1H), 3.97–3.91 (m,1H), 2.37–2.20 (m, 2H), 1.64–1.49 (m, 2H)
9.29 (s, 1H), 7.51 (dd, 1H, J = 1.6, 11.2 Hz), 7.40–7.33 (m, 4H), 7.16–7.05 (m, 4H), 7.05–6.93 (m, 2H), 6.75–6.72 (m, 2H), 4.29
(d, 1H, J = 4.8 Hz), 3.97–3.93 (m, 1H), 2.50–2.20 (m, 2H), 2.50–2.20 (m, 2H), 1.62–1.55 (m, 2H)
negative control, atorvastatin (Atr, 20 mg ⁄ kg), 2a (5, 20 mg ⁄ kg),
2b (5, 20 mg ⁄ kg), 2c (5, 20 mg ⁄ kg), 2d (5, 20 mg ⁄ kg), 2e (5,
20 mg ⁄ kg), 2f (5, 20 mg ⁄ kg), 2j (5, 20 mg ⁄ kg), 2h (5, 20 mg ⁄ kg),
2i (5, 20 mg ⁄ kg), and 2j (5, 20 mg ⁄ kg). The normal group was
fed with standard chow, and the negative control was fed with
hypercholesterol chow including 10% lard and 0.5% cholesterol.
The other groups were fed with hypercholesterol chow (10% lard,
0.5% cholesterol) and corresponding drugs suspended in 0.5%
sodium carboxymethylcellulose (CMC-Na) once daily for 28 days.
After the final administration, they were fasted overnight, and
blood was withdrawn from jugular vein. The plasma was sepa-
rated and measured for triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC),
LDL, and high-density lipoprotein level (HDL) using Hitachi auto-
matic biochem analyzer-7080. The ratio of HDL ⁄ LDL was intro-
duced to evaluate the ability of the tested compound for selective
reduction in LDL. The results are shown in Table 3.
732
Chem Biol Drug Des 2011; 78: 730–733