and the SEC measurements of the nanoparticles revealed a
strong coupling between neighbouring triarylamine units
which is due to through space intervalence interactions24 in
these metal–organic mixed-valence conjugates. The SEC also
showed for the larger particle that by charging the
chromophore–nanoparticle system, the gold core transitions
are damped. These multi-electron redox active nanoparticle
systems may be interesting building blocks in the field of
charge storage (electron sponge) as they can be loaded to a
high degree at constant potential.
We thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for
financing this project within the Research Training School
GRK1221.
Notes and references
Fig. 4 SEC of Au-TaraL (black line) in dcm–TBAH. The SEC is
composed of three processes coloured yellow, red and blue. The
coloured arrows symbolise the changes of the band intensities for
each process.
1 M. Hu, J. Y. Chen, Z. Y. Li, L. Au, G. V. Hartland, X. D. Li,
M. Marquez and Y. N. Xia, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2006, 35, 1084–1094.
2 C. J. Murphy, A. M. Gole, J. W. Stone, P. N. Sisco,
A. M. Alkilany, E. C. Goldsmith and S. C. Baxter, Acc. Chem.
Res., 2008, 41, 1721–1730.
The SEC of Au-TaraL can also be described by three
sequential processes. (Fig. 4). Only the first process is fully
reversible. Initial increasing of the potential (first process)
leads to a dramatic decrease of all characteristic gold core
band intensities. With further increase of the potential
the triarylamine radical cation band at 13 100 cmÀ1 rises
(second process) and the gold core bands gain more intensity.
This process is associated with an increase in a band at
ca. 10 000 cmÀ1. As the radical cation band continues to
increase, the gold core bands and the band at 10 000 cmÀ1
decreases (third process). Again, as in Au-TaraS the latter
band is interpreted to be an IVCT band.
3 M. C. Daniel and D. Astruc, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 293–346.
4 B. I. Ipe and K. G. Thomas, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2004, 108,
13265–13272.
5 H. Imahori, Y. Kashiwagi, Y. Endo, T. Hanada, Y. Nishimura,
I. Yamazaki, Y. Araki, O. Ito and S. Fukuzumi, Langmuir, 2004,
20, 73–81.
6 J. Ohyama, Y. Hitomi, Y. Higuchi, M. Shinagawa, H. Mukai,
M. Kodera, K. Teramura, T. Shishido and T. Tanaka, Chem.
Commun., 2008, 6300–6302.
7 C. Lambert and V. Kriegisch, Langmuir, 2006, 22, 8807–8812.
8 E. Steckhan, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1986, 25, 683–701.
9 M. Thelakkat, Macromol. Mater. Eng., 2002, 287, 442–461.
10 C. Lambert, S. Amthor and J. Schelter, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2004,
108, 6474–6486.
11 D. R. Kattnig, B. Mladenova, G. Grampp, C. Kaiser,
A. Heckmann and C. Lambert, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113,
2983–2995.
In the first process the gold core gets charged. Such a core-
charging alters the electronic structure of the gold core and
is known to affect some gold transitions within the gold
nanoparticle.21,22 It might also be possible that the electrolyte
(TBAH) mediates electrostatic interactions between the
charged particles which causes an aggregation of particles.
Chandrasekharan et al. found that aggregation of a gold
nanoparticle coated with Rhodamine 6G was responsible for
a damping and broadening of the SPB.23 Whatever the reasons
may be for this effect, oxidation of the triarylamine centres in
the second step disturbs it strongly. In contrast, the smaller
particle size of Au-TaraS and/or the superimposition with the
more intense triarylamine bands could be the reasons that a
damping of the gold core band intensities are not detectable in
the SEC of Au-TaraS.
12 C. Lambert and G. Noll, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 8434.
¨
13 S. Amthor and C. Lambert, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2006, 110,
1177–1189.
14 M. P. Rowe, K. E. Plass, K. Kim, C. Kurdak, E. T. Zellers and
A. J. Matzger, Chem. Mater., 2004, 16, 3513–3517.
15 C. Xue, G. Arumugam, K. Palaniappan, S. A. Hackney, H. Liu
and J. Liu, Chem. Commun., 2005, 1055–1057.
16 D. Li, Y. Zhang, J. Jiang and J. Li, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2003,
264, 109–113.
17 A. J. Haes, S. L. Zou, J. Zhao, G. C. Schatz and R. P. Van Duyne,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 10905–10914.
18 P. D. Jadzinsky, G. Calero, C. J. Ackerson, D. A. Bushnell and
R. D. Kornberg, Science, 2007, 318, 430–433.
19 A. Heckmann, S. Amthor and C. Lambert, Chem. Commun., 2006,
2959–2961.
20 W. Chen, S. Chen, F. Ding, H. Wang, L. E. Brown and
J. P. Konopelski, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 12156–12162.
21 G. C. Lica, B. S. Zelakiewicz, M. Constantinescu and Y. Y. Tong,
J. Phys. Chem. B, 2004, 108, 19896–19900.
22 V. L. Jimenez, D. G. Georganopoulou, R. J. White, A. S. Harper,
A. J. Mills, D. Lee and R. W. Murray, Langmuir, 2004, 20,
6864–6870.
In summary, we present the first synthesis of triarylamine-
functionalised gold nanoparticles of two different sizes. The
absorption properties of these two conjugates differ strongly
both in the neutral state and in the ligand oxidised state. In the
neutral state this is due to different electric fields emanating
from the gold particle which interacts with the transition
dipole of the ligands. In the ligand oxidised state, the OSWV
23 N. Chandrasekharan, P. V. Kamat, J. Hu and G. J. Il, J. Phys.
Chem. B, 2000, 104, 11103–11109.
24 D.-L. Sun, S. V. Rosokha, S. V. Lindeman and J. K. Kochi, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 15950–15963.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
Chem. Commun., 2009, 6213–6215 | 6215