2110
M. Hamada et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 20 (2009) 2105–2111
NH2); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d = 29.6, 44.7, 62.8, 67.0, 67.7,
77.4, 78.1, 169.9, 170.4; IR mmax 3400, 3190, 2958, 1753, 1680,
1417, 1306, 1197 cmꢀ1. Anal. Calcd for C9H11NO5: C, 50.70; H,
5.20; N, 6.57. Found: C, 50.53; H, 5.15; N, 6.47.
Further recrystallization provided a sample of (+)-1a (49%
recovery, mp 112–113 °C), ½a D23
¼ þ15:8 (c 0.76, MeOH). This sam-
ꢁ
ple was revealed to be 96.4% ee by the HPLC analysis at the subse-
quent stage of 6a as below, and we concluded that the
enantiomeric excess of the acid 1a reaches constant value by rep-
etition of the recrystallization from EtOAc.
4.3.9. 2,2,2-Trifluoroethyl ( )-3,8-dioxatricyclo[3.2.1.02.4]-
octane-6-carboxylate 1g
The scaled-up experiment by applying ( )-1e (1.00 g, 4.59 mmol)
worked well in a reproducible manner to give (ꢀ)-1e: (230 mg,
A mixture of carboxylic acid ( )-1a (156 mg, 1.00 mmol), DMAP
(245 mg, 2.00 mmol), EDC-Cl (384 mg, 2.00 mmol), CF3CH2OH
(150 mg, 1.50 mmol), and triethylamine (202 mg, 2.00 mmol) in
DMF (1 mL) was stirred at room temperature under argon. The reac-
tion was monitored by silica gel TLC, developed with hexane–EtOAc
(1:4). After stirring for 10 h at room temperature, the mixture was
quenched by the addition of EtOAc–water. The organic materials
were extracted with EtOAc, and the combined organic phases were
washed with brine and dried over Na2SO4. The organic phase was
concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by silca gel column
chromatography with hexane–EtOAc (1:1) to afford trifluoroethyl
ester ( )-1g (192 mg, 80.6%) as a colorless oil; 1H NMR (270 MHz,
CDCl3): d = 1.93 (1H, ddd, J = 4.6, 11.3, 11.6 Hz, H-7exo), 2.04 (1H,
dd, J = 4.3, 11.6 Hz, H-7endo), 2.94 (1H, dt, J = 4.6, 11.3 Hz, H-6), 3.98
(1H, dd, J = 2.4, 4.6 Hz, H-4), 4.05 (1H, dd, J = 2.2, 4.6 Hz, H-2), 4.44
(1H, dddd, J = 8.4, 12.7 Hz, CH2CF3), 4.53 (1H, dt, J = 1.9, 4.9 Hz, H-
5), 4.58 (1H, dddd, J = 8.4, 12.7 Hz, CH2CF3), 4.69 (1H, dt, J = 1.9,
4.9 Hz, H-1); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d = 29.5, 44.4, 60.2, 60.6,
22.9%) ½a 2D4
¼ ꢀ5:3 (c 1.00, CHCl3); 99.7% ee after derivatization to
ꢁ
6b and its HPLC anlalysis. Acid (+)-1a: (428 mg, 59.8%)
½
a 2D4
sponding 6a.
ꢁ
¼ þ11:0 (c 1.00, MeOH); 77.3% ee by HPLC analysis of corre-
4.3.12. Methyl (1S,2R,4S,5R,6S)-(+)-3,8-dioxatricyclo[3.2.1.02.4]-
octane-6-carboxylate 1c
To a solution of the acid (+)-1a (30.6 mg, 0.20 mmol) as above in
anhydrous DMF was added Cs2CO3 (163 mg, 0.50 mmol) and CH3I
(85.1 mg, 0.60 mmol). The mixture was stirred at 50 °C for 24 h.
After concentration to dryness in vacuo, the residue was extracted
with EtOAc (three times), and the combined organic layer was
washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo.
The residue was purified by preparative TLC with hexane–EtOAc
(1:1) to afford methyl ester (+)-1c (20.1 mg, 59%) as a colorless so-
lid. Mp 67–68 °C, ½a D23
¼ þ11:7 (c 0.57, MeOH). Its IR and NMR
ꢁ
spectra were identical with that of the authentic specimen.2
66.5, 66.6, 77.4, 77.5, 121.5, 124.3, 169.7; IR mmax 3010, 2969, 2368,
2337, 1747, 1411,1276, 1155, 879 cmꢀ1. HRMS (EI): calcd for
4.3.13. Methyl (1S,5S,6R)-(ꢀ)-5-hydroxy-7-oxabicyclo[4.1.0]-
C9H9F3O4: [M+]: 238.0453; found: m/z = 238.0453.
hept-2-en-3-carboxylate 6a
To
a solution of lithium hexamethyldisilazide [(TMS)2NLi,
4.3.10. PLE-catalyzed hydrolysis of esters 1b–1g
0.20 mL, 0.20 mmol] was added in THF (0.20 mL) at ꢀ78 °C. To a
solution of methyl ester (ꢀ)-1c (20.1 mg, 0.13 mmol) in THF
(0.20 mL) was added the LHMDS solution above dropwise at
ꢀ78 °C, and the mixture was stirred for 1 h at that temperature.
The reaction was quenched with saturated NH4Cl aq solution, and
extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic layer was washed with
brine, driedover Na2SO4, and concentratedin vacuo. Theresiduewas
purified by preparative TLC with hexane–EtOAc (1:1) to afford
methyl ester (ꢀ)-6a (14.0 mg, 70%, 90.6% ee) as a colorless solid.
The hydrolysis of each substrate was carried out under the same
conditions as described for the screening of enzymes with ethyl es-
ter 1b. The E-value of the each substrate was uniformly calculated
from the conversion and ee(P) as follows. The conversion was deter-
mined by 1H NMR analysis of crude reaction mixture. Ee(P) was
determined by the HPLC analysis at the stage of 6a, after methyla-
tion of hydrolyzate and following b-elimination as described later.
4.3.11. PLE-catalyzed hydrolysis of 2-chloroethyl ester 1e
To a stirred solution of 2-chloroethyl ester ( )-1e (373.3 mg,
1.71 mmol) in a phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 7.0; 8.5 mL), PLE (Sig-
½
a 2D3
ꢁ
¼ ꢀ200 (c 0.70, MeOH) [lit.:2
[a]D = +213 (c 0.56, MeOH), for
(1R,5R,6S)-6a]. The product (ꢀ)-6a was analyzed by HPLC [column,
Daicel Chiralcel OD-H, 0.46 cm ꢂ 25 cm; hexane–2-propanol (5:1);
flow rate 0.5 mL/min]: tR (min) = 15.1 (95.3%), 33.1 (4.7%).
ma, E2884, 850 lL) was added and the mixture was stirred for 24 h
at room temperature. The reaction was quenched with 1 M HCl to
pH 2, and extracted with EtOAc (10 times). The combined organic
layer was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo, and the ra-
tio between unreacted recovery 1e and hydrolyzate 1a was deter-
mined by 1H NMR measurement. The above mentioned crude
mixture was washed with saturated NaHCO3 aq solution. The or-
ganic layer was washed with brine and dried over Na2SO4, concen-
trated in vacuo to give (ꢀ)-1e (159.3 mg, 0.73 mmol) as the
unreacted recovery. The aqueous layer was acidified to pH 3 and
extracted with EtOAc (10 times). The extract was dried over
Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo to give (+)-1a (145.4 mg,
0.93 mmol, mp 107–108 °C). These samples were employed for
the next step without further purification.
Enantiomerically enriched acid (+)-1a (15.6 mg, 0.10 mmol) by
recrystallization in twice was treated with CH2N2 to give (+)-1c
(15.7 mg, 89%); mp 63–64 °C, ½a D23
¼ þ11:7 (c 0.75, MeOH). This
ꢁ
was converted to (ꢀ)-6a (11.1 mg, 74%, 96.4% ee); ½a D23
¼ ꢀ207 (c
ꢁ
0.55, MeOH). HPLC analysis was performed in the same manner:
tR (min) = 15.1 (98.2%), 33.1 (1.8%).
4.3.14. 2-Chloroethyl (1R,5R,6S)-(+)-5-hydroxy-7-oxabicyclo-
[4.1.0]hept-2-en-3-carboxylate 6b
In a similar manner as described for ( )-6b, 2-chloroethyl ester
(ꢀ)-1e (47.2 mg, 0.21 mmol) in THF (0.30 mL) was added with a
solution of lithium hexamethyldisilazide [(TMS)2NLi, 0.31 mL,
0.31 mmol] in THF (0.30 mL), gave (+)-6b (36.4 mg, 77%, 99.4%
Ester (ꢀ)-1e: ½a D23
¼ ꢀ5:3 (c 1.02, CHCl3), 99.4% ee as shown be-
ꢁ
ee: ½a 2D3
¼ þ233 (c 1.08, MeOH); The product (+)-6b was analyzed
ꢁ
low. Its IR and NMR spectra were in good accordance with those of
racemic sample. Acid (+)-1a: ½a D23
¼ þ11:7 (c 1.00, MeOH), 90.6% ee
ꢁ
by HPLC analysis [column, Daicel Chiralcel OD-H, 0.46 cm ꢂ 25 cm;
hexane–2-propanol (5:1); flow rate 0.5 mL/min]: tR (min) = 18.0
(0.3%), 38.0 (99.7%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d = 2.32 (1H, ddd,
as shown below. This was further purified by recrystallization from
EtOAc to give (+)-1a (93.6 mg, 71%, mp 114–115 °C) ½a D23
¼ þ14:4
ꢁ
J = 3.3, 5.2, 17.6 Hz, H-6b), 2.80 (1H, dt, J = 2.1, 17.6 Hz, H-6a),
(c 0.75, MeOH). The sample obtained by recrystallization as above
(15.0 mg) was treated with CH2N2 to give (+)-1c (15.6 mg, 96%);
3.48 (1H, t, J = 3.9 Hz, H-3), 3.57 (1H, ddd, J = 2.1, 2.8, 3.9 Hz, H-
4), 3.69 (2H, t, J = 5.7 Hz, CH2Cl), 4.38 (2H, t, J = 5.7 Hz, CO2CH2),
4.57 (1H, br m, H-5), 7.19 (1H, dd, J = 3.3, 3.9 Hz, H-2); 13C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3): d = 29.3, 41.5, 46.2, 56.1, 63.5, 64.5, 130.3,
134.4, 165.5; IR mmax 3425, 2964, 1709, 1641, 1417, 1392, 1250,
mp 63–64 °C, ½a 2D3
¼ þ11:7 (c 0.75, MeOH). This was further con-
ꢁ
verted to (ꢀ)-6a (11.1 mg, 74%, 95.6% ee); ½a D23
¼ ꢀ207 (c 0.55,
ꢁ
MeOH). HPLC analysis was performed in the same manner: tR
(min) = 15.1 (97.8%), 33.1 (2.2%).