S. S. Chauhan / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 6913–6915
NH-Cbz NH-Cbz
Fmoc-OSu
Na2CO3
6915
NH-R
Cbz-OSu
NaOH
1) H2; 10% Pd/C
9
OH
OH
2) (Boc)2O/
DIPEA
OH
R-HN
Fmoc-HN
Fmoc-HN
O
O
O
14
15; R = H
16; R = Boc
12; R = H
13; R = Cbz
Scheme 3.
further purification was converted into Fmoc-derivative with Fmoc-
OSu and sodium carbonate as above. Purification of the crude product
as above afforded (L)-Fmoc-a-Me-Lys(Boc)-OH (16) in 59% isolated
yield from azide 8 (three steps). Fmoc-a-Me-Lys(Boc)-OH from both
1) Me3P
1) H2/PdCl2
O
O
strategies showed identical chromatographic23 and spectroscopic
characteristics.24
8
16
O
N
2) Boc-ON
2) Fmoc-OSu
Na2CO3
In conclusion, (L)-a-Me-Lys-OH (9) was obtained from oxazinone
O
(4) as a chiral auxiliary in a total of four steps in 37.4% overall yield.
Regioselective protection of 9 afforded Fmoc-
a
-Me-Lys(Boc)-OH
-Me-Lys(Boc)-OH
17
Scheme 4.
(16) in additional four steps. Besides, Fmoc-
a
NH-Boc
(16)wasobtainedviaStaudingerreductionof theintermediateazide
(8) in a total of six steps in overall good yield (26.3%). Both strategies
afforded the target compound in excellent optical purity (>95%). The
synthesis is short and efficient as the reactions could be monitored
by HPLC and the intermediates could be purified simply by recrystal-
lization without the need for column chromatography.
Having obtained (L)-
tion of the
Scheme 2. Thus, 9 was treated with basic copper carbonate fol-
lowed by treatment with (Boc)2O. The -Boc-protected product
10 was obtained in only 25% yield.18 Cleavage of the copper com-
a
-Me-Lysine (9), we tried selective protec-
e
-amino function via copper complex as shown in
e
References and notes
plex by chelation with 8-hydroxyquinoline afforded (L)-
a-Me-
Lys(Boc)-OH (11) in overall 10% yield.19
1. Ma, J. S. Chim. OGGI 2003, 21, 65–68.
2. Goodman, M.; Ro, S., 5th ed.. In Burger’s Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery;
Wolff, M. E., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, 1995; Vol. 1, pp 803–861. Chapter 20.
3. Toniolo, C.; Crisma, M.; Formaggio, F.; Peggion, C. Biopolymers (Pept. Sci.) 2001,
60, 396–419.
4. Seebach, D.; Sting, A. R.; Hoffmann, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1996, 35, 2708–
2748.
5. Wirth, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1997, 36, 225–227.
6. Cativiela, C.; Diaz-de-Villegas, M. D. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 3517–
3599.
7. Duthaler, R. O. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 1539–1650.
8. Singh, S. Recent Res. Dev. Org. Chem. 2004, 8, 323–340.
9. Singh, S.; Pennington, M. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2683–2685.
10. Singh, S.; Rao, S. J.; Pennington, M. W. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 4551–4554.
11. Bey, P.; Danzan, C.; Dorsselaer, V. V.; Mamona, P.; Jung, M.; Tardif, C. J. Med.
Chem. 1978, 21, 50–55.
Since the yield form copper complex was poor perhaps due to ste-
ric hindrance by -methyl group, we decided to try regioselective
benzyloxycarbonylation of the -amino group of 9. The higher pKa
of the -NH2 (10.5) compared to -NH2 (9.0) renders it more nucle-
ophilic and is known to react selectively, albeit in moderate yield.20
As shown in Scheme 3, (L)- -Me-Lys-OH (9) was treated with
1 N aq NaOH (2 equiv) and Cbz-OSu (1.1 equiv) in acetone at 0 °C
overnight. As expected (L)-H- -Me-Lys(Cbz)-OH (12) was obtained
in 72% yield. Di-Cbz protected product, Cbz- -Me-Lys(Cbz)-OH
a
e
e
a
a
a
a
(13) was also obtained in ꢁ11% yield, but it was easily removed
by washing the acidic aqueous mixture with ethyl acetate. Com-
pound 12 was then treated with Fmoc-OSu and sodium carbonate
in water/dioxane mixture at ambient temperature overnight.21 (L)-
12. Regenstreif, C. A.; Kelland, J. G.; Pansare, S. V.; Vedaras, J. C.; Pickard, M. A. Can.
J. Microbiol. 1986, 32, 522–524.
13. Gander-Coquoz, M.; Seebach, D. Helv. Chim. Acta 1988, 71, 224–236.
14. Cativiela, C.; Diaz-de-Villegas, M. D.; Galvez, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 2497–
2505.
Fmoc-
white solid after work-up. It was then hydrogenolyzed over 10%
Pd/C catalyst to afford (L)-Fmoc- -Me-Lys-OH (15) in 73% yield,
a-Me-Lys(Cbz)-OH (14) was obtained in 60% yield as an off-
15. Cativiela, C.; Diaz-de-Villegas, M. D.; Galvez, J. A.; Ronco, E. Chirality 2004, 16,
106–111.
a
which was subsequently treated with (Boc)2O and diisopropylethyl
amine in water/dioxane mixture. After work-up and silica gel col-
umn chromatography (dichloromethane/methanol), (L)-Fmoc-a-
Me-Lys(Boc)-OH (16) was obtained in 64% yield (90% pure) as a
white solid. Compound 16 could also be purified by C18 reversed-
phase HPLC using 0.1% TFA containing water/acetonitrile buffers.
Using regioselective benzyloxycarbonylation approach (Scheme
16. Williams, R. M.; Im, M.-N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 9276–9286.
17. Oppolzer, W.; Moretti, R.; Zhou, C. Helv. Chim. Acta 1994, 77, 2363–2380.
18. Scott, J. W.; Parker, D.; Parrish, D. R. Synth. Commun. 1981, 11, 303–314.
19. Wiejak, S.; Masiukiewicz, E.; Rzeszotarska, B. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1999, 47,
1489–1490.
20. Bodanszky, M.; Bodanszky, A. In The Practice of Peptide Synthesis, 2nd ed.;
Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: Germany, 1994; pp 51–52.
21. Atherton, E.; Sheppard, R. C. In Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis; IRL Press: Oxford,
England, 1989; p 61.
3), we obtained Fmoc-a-Me-Lys(Boc)-OH (16) in 20% overall yield
22. Ariza, X.; Urpi, F.; Viladomat, C.; Vilarrasa, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 9109–
9112.
23. Analytical HPLC was performed on a C18
starting form H- -Me-Lys-OH (8). Our goal was then to improve the
a
, reversed-phase column (Vydac,
yield and reduce the number of steps. Therefore, we adopted an alter-
native strategy using Staudinger reduction as shown in Scheme 4.
Compound 8 was reduced with trimethylphosphine in toluene at
0 °C. The intermediate phosphazene was not isolated but rather re-
acted with Boc-ON in situ.22 Compound 17 was isolated in 92% yield
after flash silica gel column chromatography (hexane/diethyl ether).
The chiral auxiliary was hydrogenolyzed as above with palladium
chloride in methanol containing 10% acetic acid/water (1:1) under
150 ꢂ 4.6 mM, 5
l
). A linear gradient from 5% to 95% buffer B in 45 min was
used. Buffer A consisted of 0.1% TFA in water and buffer B was 0.1% TFA in
acetonitrile. Flow rate was 1.5 mL/min. Compound 16 eluted at 24.4 min under
these conditions.
24. Maldi-Tof-MS (CCA matrix): 505 (C27H34N2O6) (M+Na)+ (35%), 382
(C22H26N2O4) (MꢀBoc)+ (100%). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CD3OD): d 7.80 (2H, d,
J = 7.2 Hz), 7.66 (2H, d, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.39 (2H, t, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.31 (2H, t, J = 7.2 Hz),
4.32 (2H, br, s), 4.21 (1H, t, J = 6.6 Hz), 3.02 (2H, br, m), 1.87 (2H, br, m), 1.47
(3H, s), 1.45 (2H, m), 1.41 (9H, m), 1.40 (2H, m). ½a D24
ꢃ
+1.18 (c 0.25, MeOH).
Anal. (purified by HPLC using C18 reversed-phase column and 0.1% TFA
containing water/acetonitrile buffers) Calcd for C27H34N2O6ꢄ2/3CF3CO2H: C,
60.92; H, 6.21; N, 5.01. Found: C, 60.78, H, 6.14; N, 5.08.
hydrogen atmosphere at 80 psi pressure. (L)-H-a-Me-Lys(Boc)-OH
(11) was obtained as a gray solid in quantitative yield, which without