Preparation of the octahydroquinoline segment was based
on precedent from Lhommet and from Bosch.11,12 Diketone
6 was combined with acrolein to produce hemiacetal 7, a
cyclic version of the underlying symmetric dione. Desym-
metrization by condensation with amino alcohol auxiliaries
8 and 9 led to the formation of vinylogous amides 10 and
11, respectively (Table 1). The condensation with 8 was
Figure 1. Classes of lycopodium alkaloids.
Table 1. Desymmetrization of Hemiacetal 7 with Amino
Alcohols
Lycoperine A (1) was recently isolated from the club moss
Lycopodium hamiltonii in Japan by Kobayashi and co-
workers from Hokkaido University.9 This compound exhib-
ited a moderate inhibitory activity against acetylcholine
esterase from bovine erythrocyte. The structure and the
relative stereochemistry of lycoperine A were determined
by detailed 2D NMR studies after conversion to the N-diethyl
analogue by the reduction of the acetamide moieties, but its
absolute configuration was not determined. This compound
has a characteristic pseudosymmetric structure in which two
identical octahydroquinoline rings are linked to a central 2,6-
cis-disubstituted piperidine ring. We report here the total
synthesis of lycoperine A and its absolute configuration.
entry auxiliary
Lewis acida
conditions
yield drb
1
2
3
4
5
8 (2 equiv) Zn(ClO4)2 · 6H2O rt, 15 h
100c 2.7:1
96c 2.7:1
92c 4:1
8 (2 equiv) Sc(OTf)3
8 (2 equiv) Cu(OTf)2
9 (2 equiv) Cu(OTf)2
9 (1.1 equiv) Cu(OTf)2
0 °C, 2 d
0 °C, 2 d
0 - 10 °C, 16 h 95d 20:1f
e
0 °C, 22 h
96d 20:1f
Our retrosynthetic analysis for lycoperine A is shown in
Scheme 1. The plan called for the generation of lycoperine
a The Lewis acid was used in 5 mol % quantities unless otherwise noted.
b The dr between C1 and C8 is reported and was estimated from NMR
spectroscopy. Epimers at C3a were also observed in roughly a 10:1 dr with
amino alcohol 8. c The product was 10. d The product was 11. e Only 3
mol % of the Lewis acid was used. f The crude mixture was ca. 92:5:2:1
by NMR analysis, but the two minor isomers were removed on
chromatography.
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis for Lycoperine A
efficient using several different Lewis acids, but the desym-
metrization to set the C8 methyl center resulted in very
modest selectivities (entries 1-3). Switching to the amino
alcohol 9 led to much more effective desymmetrization, with
ca. 95:5 dr at the C8 stereogenic center. Copper triflate was
the best catalyst, and 3 mol % of the catalyst was effective
(entry 5). Minor diastereomers were produced with both
auxiliaries, but in the case of 9 they could be separated on
silica gel chromatography to deliver the vinylogous amide
11 in 96% yield. The relative configuration of compound
11 was confirmed by X-ray crystallography.13 This unusual
desymmetrization strategy12d allowed the C8 stereogenic
center to be introduced efficiently from a racemic precursor.
Synthesis of the octahydroquinoline 4 is presented in
Scheme 2. Optimized conditions for the desymmetrization
A by reductive decyanation of the dinitrile 2 and is based
on precedent from Husson’s program.10 The dinitrile 2 would
arise from a double alkylation of 2,6-dicyano-N-benzylpi-
peridine (3) with the octahydroquinoline 4. The synthesis
of 4 was envisioned to come from elaboration of vinylogous
amide 5, which itself would be prepared by a desymmetri-
zation reaction. The starting material for the synthesis was
5-methylcyclohexane-1,3-dione (6). The configuration of the
natural product would be derived from a chiral amino alcohol
auxiliary.
(11) (a) Noe¨l, R.; Vanucci-Bacque, C.; Fargeau-Bellassoued, M.-C.;
Lhommet, G. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 9044–9047. (b) Noel, R.; Fargeau-
Bellassoued, M. C.; Vanucci-Bacque, C.; Lhommet, G. Synthesis 2008,
1948–1954. (c) Noel, R.; Vanucci-Bacque, C.; Fargeau-Bellassoued, M. C.;
Lhommet, G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 476–486
.
(12) (a) Amat, M.; Fabregat, R.; Griera, R.; Bosch, J. J. Org. Chem.
2009, 74, 1794–1797. (b) Amat, M.; Perez, M.; Minaglia, A. T.; Bosch, J.
J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 6920–6923. (c) Amat, M.; Griera, R.; Tabregat,
R.; Molins, E.; Bosch, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3348–3351. (d)
Amat, M.; Bassas, O.; Llor, N.; Canto, M.; Perez, M.; Molins, E.; Bosch,
J. Chem.sEur. J. 2006, 12, 7872–7881. (e) Escolano, C.; Amat, M.; Bosch,
(9) Hirasawa, Y.; Kobayashi, J.; Morita, H. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 123–
126.
J. Chem.sEur. J. 2006, 12, 8198–8207.
(13) Details of the X-ray structures for compounds 11, 12, and 13 are
(10) Husson, H.-P.; Royer, J. Chem. Soc. ReV. 1999, 28, 383–394.
included in Supporting Information.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 1, 2010
73