precursors,9 reductive coupling,10 aza-Wittig reactions,11
multicomponent coupling methodologies,12 and other mul-
tistep operations.13 However, some of them usually present
significant limitations, such as tedious workup, harsh nature
of reaction conditions, low yields, long reaction times, or
the requirement for an inert atmosphere. Therefore, the
continuous studies for the synthesis of pyrroles in terms of
efficient, environmentally benign, operational simplicity,
economic viability, and high selectivity are still of great
significance. Herein, we report an efficient and straightfor-
ward protocol under mild conditions to the synthesis of
pyrroles, which is also a novel one-pot strategy for silver-
catalyzed and PIDA-mediated sequential reactions.
At the outset of our studies, various silver catalysts were
tested by heating the mixture of dimethyl but-2-ynedioate
(1a) and benzylamine (2a) using PIDA as the oxidant in
dioxane at 100 °C (Table 1), and the expected tetramethyl
1-benzyl-1H-pyrrole-2,3,4,5-tetracarboxylate (3aa) was in-
deed obtained. Among the salts we tested, silver tetrafluo-
roborate (AgBF4) showed the highest activity for this reaction
(Table 1, entries 1-5). A survey of solvents indicated that
this reaction was sensitive to the solvent medium (Table 1,
entries 6-10). Among the various solvents examined,
dioxane, 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE), and acetonitrile (CH3CN)
were practical for this transformation (Table 1, entries 1, 9,
and 10). The reaction time had an obvious effect on this
reaction, and the suitable time was 3 h (Table 1, entries 1,
12, and 13). The dosage of PIDA had no significant impact
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditionsa
catalyst
entry (5 mol %)
temp
(°C)
solvent
time (h) yieldb (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
AgBF4
AgOTf
AgClO4
AgNO3
Ag2CO3
AgBF4
AgBF4
AgBF4
AgBF4
AgBF4
AgBF4
AgBF4
AgBF4
AgBF4
dioxane
dioxane
dioxane
dioxane
dioxane
toluene
DMSO
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
80
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
4
3
3
75
29
49
32
63
41
27
22
65
72
85
85
89
88
DMA
DCE
9
10
12
13
14c
15d
acetonitrile
dioxane
dioxane
dioxane
dioxane
80
100
100
100
100
a 1a (0.50 mmol), 2a (0.25 mmol), solvent (2 mL), PIDA (1.0 equiv).
b GC yield. c PIDA (1.2 equiv). d PIDA (2.0 equiv).
on the reaction, and the best result was obtained when the
amount of PIDA was 1.2 equiv (Table 1, entries 12, 14, and
15).
(5) (a) Nishibayashi, Y.; Yoshikawa, M.; Inada, Y.; Milton, M. D.; Hidai,
M.; Uemura, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 2681. (b) Larionov, O. V.;
De Meijere, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5664. (c) Kamijo, S.;
Kanazawa, C.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9260. (d)
Mart´ın, R.; Rivero, M. R.; Buchwald, S. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006,
45, 7079. (e) Beck, E. M.; Grimster, N. P. L.; Hatley, R. L.; Gaunt, M. J. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2528. (f) St. Cyr, D. J.; Arndtsen, B. A.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12366. (g) Hwang, S. J.; Cho, S. H.; Chang,
S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16158. (h) Brichacek, M.; Njardarson,
J. T. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 1761. (i) Zhu, Q. H.; Jiang, H. F.; Li,
J. H.; Liu, S. W.; Xia, C. L.; Zhang, M. J. Comb. Chem. 2009, 11, 685. (j)
Fu, X. P.; Chen, J. J.; Li, G. Y.; Liu, Y. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009,
48, 5500. (k) Trofimov, B. A.; Schmidt, E. Y.; Mikhaleva, A. I. Chem.sEur.
J. 2009, 15, 6435. (l) Fujiwara, M.; Kawatsura, M.; Hayase, S.; Nanjo, M.;
Itoha, T. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 123. (m) Lu, Y. D.; Arndtsen, B. A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 5430.
Under the optimized conditions, we explored the scope
of the reaction, and the results are summarized in Table 2.
Treatment of dimethyl but-2-ynedioate (1a) with various
amines 2 furnished the corresponding pyrroles 3 in moderate
to excellent isolated yields (Table 2, entries 1-12). As shown
in Table 2, aromatic amines whether with electron-withdraw-
ing groups or with electron-donating groups are all suitable
for this protocol. Besides, the reaction appears quite tolerant
with respect to the position of the substituent on the benzene
ring of the aromatic amines. For example, the addition/
oxidative cyclization of dimethyl but-2-ynedioate (1a) with
p-toluidine (2d) or m-toluidine (2e) as well as dimethyl but-
2-ynedioate (1a) with 4-chlorobenzenamine (2g) or 2-chlo-
robenzenamine (2h) led to pyrroles in reasonable yields
(entries 4, 5, 7, and 8). However, the reaction is quite
sensitive to the electronic contribution of the substituent on
the benzene ring. For example, the reaction of dimethyl but-
2-ynedioate (1a) with 4-methoxy-phenylamine (2c) afforded
tetramethyl 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1H-pyrrole-2,3,4,5-tetra-
carboxylate (3ac) in 78% yield, while 4-fluorobenzenamine
(2f) only resulted in tetramethyl 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-
pyrrole-2,3,4,5-tetracarboxylate (3af) in 53% yield. Interest-
ingly, the amines bearing an aliphatic substituent proved to
be a suitable partner. All the tested aliphatic amines resulted
in excellent yields (Table 2, entries 1 and 9-12). Addition-
ally, diethyl acetylenedicarboxylate (1b), methyl propiolate
(1c), and ethyl but-2-ynoate (1d) can all react with benzy-
lamime (2a) smoothly to give corresponding pyrroles in good
yields (Table 2, entries 13-15).
(6) (a) Manley, J. M.; Kalman, M. J.; Conway, M. J.; Ball, C. C.; Havens,
J. L.; Vaidyanathan, R. J. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 6447. (b) Shiner, C. M.;
Laner, T. D. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 11628.
(7) Matiychuk, V. S.; Martyack, R. L.; Obushak, N. D.; Ostapiuk, Y. V.;
Pidlypnyi, N. I. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 2004, 40, 1218.
(8) (a) Chen, J.; Wu, H.; Zheng, Z.; Jin, C.; Zhang, X.; Su, W.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 5383. (b) Minetto, G.; Raveglia, L. F.; Sega,
A.; Taddei, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 24, 5277.
(9) (a) KelVin, A. V.; Sromek, A. W.; Gevorgyan, V. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 2074. (b) Kim, J. T.; Gevorgyan, V. Org. Lett. 2002, 4,
4697. (c) Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G.; Fazio, A. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7853.
(d) Gorin, D. J.; Davis, N. R.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
11260. (e) Hiroya, K.; Matsumoto, S.; Ashikawa, M.; Ogiwara, K.;
Sakamoto, T. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5349. (f) Larionov, O. V. Angew. Chem.
2005, 117, 5809; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5664. (g) Agarwal, S.;
Kno¨lker, H. J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 3060. (h) Kno¨lker, H. J.;
Agarwal, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 1173.
(10) Furstner, A.; Weintritt, H.; Hupperts, A. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60,
6637.
(11) Katritzky, A.; Jiang, J.; Steel, P. J. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 4551.
(12) (a) Tejedor, D.; Gonzales-Cruz, D.; Garcia-Tellado, F.; Marrero-
Tellado, J. J.; Rodriguez, M. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8390. (b)
Yamamoto, Y.; Hayashi, H.; Saigoku, T.; Nishiyama, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 10804.
(13) Periasamy, M.; Srinivas, G.; Bharati, P. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64,
4204.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 2, 2010
313