JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH 2009 577
D2O exchangeable); MS: m/z 320 (M + 2, 7.04%), 319 (M + 1,
10.23%), 318 (M+, 69.69%). Anal. Calcd for C13H10N4O4S: C, 49.05;
H, 3.16; N, 17.60. Found: C, 48.91; H, 3.27; N, 17.64%.
3-[2-(4-Oxo-3-phenyl-1,3-thiazolidin-2-ylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl
methyl]quinoxalin-2(1H)-one (13): A mixture of phenylthiosemi-
carbazide 12 (3.53 g, 0.01 mol) and monochloroacetic acid (0.94 g,
0.01 mol), in absolute ethanol (30 mL) was stirred at room
temperature for 1 h., anhydrous sodium acetate (0.82 g, 0.01 mol)
was then added and the reaction mixture was heated under reflux for
10 h. The solid separated was filtered and crystallised from ethanol.
Yield: 63%; m.p. 230–232°C; IR: 3448–3141 (NH), 1713, 1624
(2C=O), 1603 (C=N); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): 4.16 (s, 2H, CH2),
4.42 (s, 2H, SCH2), 6.03 (s, 1H, vinylic =CH), 7.06–7.71 (m, 9H,
ArH), 10.37 (s, 1H, CONH, D2O exchangeable), 11.70 (s, 1H, N4H,
D2O exchangeable), 11.90, 12.55 (2 s, 1H, N1H, OH, tautomers of
quinoxaline, D2O exchangeable), MS: m/z 395 (M + 2, 3.56%), 393
(M+, 3.56%). Anal. Calcd for C19H15N5O3S: C, 58.00; H, 3.84; N,
17.80. Found: C, 58.02; H, 4.01; N, 18.01%.
3-[(5-Oxo-4,5-dihydro-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)methyl]quinoxalin-2(1H)-
one (8): To a solution of 7 (3.18 g, 0.01 mol) in glacial acetic acid
(10 mL), H2O2 (5 mL) was added. The solution was left overnight
with stirring, the solvent was removed under vacuum and the solid
was crystallised from chloroform. Yield: 52%; m.p. 237–239°C;
IR: 3397–3107 (NH); 1709, 1677 (2C=O), 1604 (C=N); 1H NMR
(DMSO-d6): 4.17 (s, 2H, CH2), 6.02 (s, 1H, vinylic =CH), 6.96–7.72
(m, 4H, ArH), 10.36 (s, 1H, NH, D2O exchangeable), 11.70 (s, 1H,
N4H, D2O exchangeable), 12.56 (s, 1H, N1H, D2O exchangeable);
MS: m/z 245 (M + 1, 3.87%), 244 (M+, 14.78%). Anal. Calcd for
C11H8N4O3: C, 54.10; H, 3.30; N, 22.94. Found: C, 54.07; H, 3.36;
N, 23.11%.
3-[(5-Phenylamino-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)methyl]quinoxalin-2-
(1H)-one (14): A solution of phenylthiosemicarbazide 12 (3.53 g,
0.01 mol) in conc. sulfuric acid (10 mL) was kept at room temperature
for 4 h, while stirring at intervals. Thereafter, it was poured onto
crushed ice, and neutralised with 10% NaOH. The separated solid
was filtered and crystallised from ethanol. Yield: 70%; m.p. 282–
General procedure for the synthesis of compounds 9a,b
To a solution of 5 (2.60 g, 0.01 mol) in absolute ethanol (200 mL),
formaldehyde (10 mL, 40%) was added. The mixture was heated
to give a clear solution, then the corresponding secondary amine
(0.01 mol) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room
temperature. The solid separated was filtered and crystallised from
chloroform.
3-[(4-(Diethylamino)methyl)-5-sulfanylidene-4,5-dihydro-1,3,4-
oxadiazol-2-yl)methyl]quinoxalin-2(1H)-one (9a): Yield: 53%; m.p.
288–290°C; IR: 3449 (NH), 1671(C=O), 1611(C=N), 1224 (C=S);
1H NMR (DMSO-d6): 1.07–1.12 (t, 6H, J = 7.2 Hz, N(CH2CH3)2);
3.89–3.91 (q, 4H, J = 7.2 Hz, N(CH2CH3)2); 4.30 (s, 2H, CH2); 4.41
(s, 2H, NCH2N); 6.01 (s, 1H, vinylic =CH), 7.02–7.33 (m, 4H, ArH);
11.21 (s, 1H, N4H, D2O exchangeable), 11.47 (s, 1H, N1H, D2O
exchangeable); MS: m/z 347 (M + 2, 12.03%), 346 (M + 1, 30.96%),
345 (M+, 9.64%). Anal. Calcd for C16H19N5O2S: C, 55.63; H, 5.54;
N, 20.27. Found: C, 55.49; H, 5.30; N, 20.51%.
3-[(4-(Morpholin-4-yl)methyl)-5-sulfanylidene-4,5-dihydro-1,3,4-
oxadiazol-2-yl)methyl]quinoxalin-2(1H)-one (9b): Yield: 37%; m.p.
249–251°C; IR: 3446 (NH), 1669 (C=O), 1611 (C=N), 1225 (C=S);
1H NMR (DMSO-d6): 3.08–3.11 (m, 4H, CH2OCH2), 3.54–3.77 (m,
4H, CH2NCH2), 4.32 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.96 (s, 2H, NCH2N), 5.83 (s,
1H, vinylic =CH), 7.01–7.77 (m, 4H, ArH), 10.25 (s, 1H, N4H, D2O
exchangeable),11.41 (s, 1H, N1H, D2O exchangeable). Anal. Calcd
for C16H17N5O3S: C, 53.47; H, 4.76; N, 19.48. Found: C, 53.56; H,
4.73; N, 19.45%.
3-[2-(Phenylcarbamoyl)hydrazinecarbonylmethyl]quinoxalin-
2(1H)-one (10): Compound 1 (6.54 g, 0.03 mol) was heated under
reflux with phenyl isocyanate (0.03 mol) in absolute ethanol (60 mL)
for 6 h. On cooling, the solid separated was filtered and crystallised
from acetic acid/water. Yield: 90%; m.p. 260–262°C; IR: 3425–3270
(NH), 1681, 1637 (2C=O), 1613 (C=N); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): 3.77
(s, 2H, CH2), 5.72 (s, 1H, vinylic =CH), 6.97–7.72 (m, 9H, ArH),
9.40, 9.84, 10.45(3 s, 3H, 3NH, D2O exchangeable), 11.56 (s, 1H,
N4H, D2O exchangeable),12.63 (s, 1H, N1H, D2O exchangeable);
MS: m/z 337 (M+, 1.63%). Anal. Calcd for C17H15N5O3: C, 60.52; H,
4.48; N, 20.76. Found: C, 60.52; H, 4.29; N, 20.55%.
1
284°C; IR: 3447–3283 (NH), 1675 (C=O), 1624 (C=N); H NMR
(DMSO-d6): 3.82 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.77 (s, 1H, vinylic =CH), 7.01–7.76
(m, 9H, ArH), 10.48 (s, 1H, NH, D2O exchangeable), 11.59 (s, 1H,
N4H, D2O exchangeable),12.66 (s, 1H, N1H, D2O exchangeable);
MS: m/z 337(M + 2, 3.85%), 336(M + 1, 5.84%), 335(M+, 24.19%).
Anal. Calcd for C17H13N5OS: C, 60.88; H, 3.90; N, 20.88. Found: C,
61.01; H, 4.00; N, 20.69%.
General procedure for the synthesis of compounds 16a,b
A mixture of equimolar amount of compound 15 (1.675 g, 0.005 mol)
and the appropriate alkyl or aryl halide (0.005 mol) in alcoholic
potassium hydroxide (0.28 g KOH in 20 mL ethanol) was heated
under reflux for 3 h. The reaction mixture was cooled, poured
onto crushed ice, the solid separated was filtered and crystallised
from acetone.
3-[(5-Ethylsulfanyl-4-phenyl-1,5-dihydro-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)-
methyl]-quinoxalin-2(1H)-one (16a)
Yield: 60%; m.p. 266–268°C; IR: 3173 (NH), 1677(C=O),
1
1635 (C=N); H NMR (DMSO-d6): 1.29–1.36 (t, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz,
CH2CH3), 3.09–3.16 (q, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2CH3), 3.57 (s, 2H, CH2),
5.57 (s, 1H, vinyl =CH), 6.94–7.66 (m, 9H, ArH), 11.12 (s, 1H, N4H,
D2O exchangeable), 11.49 (s, 1H, N1H, D2O exchangeable). Anal.
Calcd for C19H17N5OS: C, 62.79; H, 4.71; N, 19.26. Found: C, 62.61;
H, 4.68; N, 19.18%.
3-[5-(Benzylsulfanyl-4-phenyl-1,5-dihydro-1,2,4-triazol-3-
yl)methyl]-quinoxalin-2(1H)-one (16b): Yield: 49%; m.p. 247–
249°C; IR: 3168 (NH), 1678 (C=O), 1631 (C=N); 1H NMR (DMSO-
d6): 3.56 (s, 2H, SCH2), 5.55 (s, 1H, vinylic =CH), 6.92–7.63 (m,
14H, ArH), 11.07 (s, 1H, N4H, D2O exchangeable), 11.45 (s, 1H,
N1H, D2O exchangeable); MS: m/z 427 (M + 2, 1.20%), 426 (M + 1,
4.92%), 425 (M+, 15.20%). Anal. Calcd for C24H19N5OS: C, 67.74;
H, 4.50; N, 16.45. Found: C, 67.69; H, 4.50; N, 16.61%.
Evaluation of anti-inflammatory activity
The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of 12 compounds
againstdifferentbacterialisolates(Staphylococcusaureus, Escherichia
coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus subtilis) were determined
by the agar-dilution method according to the National Committee for
Clinical Laboratory Standards.14
General procedure for the synthesis of compounds 11a,b
A mixture of compound 1 (2.18 g, 0.01 mol) and the appropriate
isocyanate derivative (0.012 mol) was heated under reflux in absolute
ethanol (50 mL) for 24 h. The formed precipitate was filtered and
crystallised from ethanol.
Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) measurement
3-[(4-Phenyl-5-oxo-1,5-dihydro-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)methyl]
quinoxalin-2(1H)-one (11a): Yield: 95%; m.p. 261–263°C; IR: 3448
(NH), 1772, 1684 (2C=O), 1609 (C=N); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): 3.80
(s, 2H, CH2), 5.74 (s, 1H, vinylic =CH), 7.00–7.75 (m, 9H, ArH),
9.43, 9.60 (2 s, 1H, NH, OH, D2O exchangeable), 10.48 (s, 1H, N4H,
D2O exchangeable), 11.59, 12.66 (2 s, 1H, N1H, OH, tautomers of
quinoxaline, D2O exchangeable). Anal. Calcd for C17H13N5O2: C,
63.94; H, 4.10; N, 21.93. Found: C, 63.75; H, 4.24; N, 21.74%.
3-[(4-(4-Chlorophenyl)-5-oxo-1,5-dihydro-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)
methyl]quinoxalin-2(1H)-one (11b): Yield: 97%; m.p. 233–235°C;
IR: 3425 (NH), 1773, 1683 (2C=O), 1613 (C=N); 1H NMR (DMSO-
d6): 3.71 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.64 (s, 1H, vinylic =CH); 6.98–7.81(m, 8H,
ArH), 9.19 (s, 1H, NH, D2O exchangeable); 11.46 (s, 1H, N4H,
D2O exchangeable),11.68, 12.16(s, brs, 1H, N1H, OH, tautomers of
quinoxaline, D2O exchangeable); MS: m/z 353 (M+, 0.51%). Anal.
Calcd for C17H12ClN5O2: C, 57.71; H, 3.41; N, 19.79. Found: C,
57.59; H, 3.60; N, 19.90%.
Mueller Hinton agar plates containing two- fold serial dilution of the
respective compounds were surface inoculated with about 104 CFU
of the test organism per spot and incubated at 37°C for 18 hours.
The plates were then observed for the presence or absence of
microbial growth. The lowest concentration showing no growth was
taken as the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC).
Results of antimicrobial activity
The results of antimicrobial testing revealed that all compounds
showed weak antibacterial activity. On the other hand, compounds 14
and 16b were the most active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
The authors thank Dr Amal E. Saafan, Department of
Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-
Swief University for help in performing the anti-microbial
testing.