Garcıa-Frutos et al.
JOCArticle
component resulting from two approaching π electron
clouds.4 In contrast, the effect of the substituents on
cation-π5 or CH-π6 interactions follows an opposite trend
and the magnitude of these interactions usually increases as
attaching electron-donating substituents. The substituents
also have an influence in the geometry of the stacking motifs.
Thus, electron-withdrawing groups decrease the π electron
density and facilitate a face-to-face geometry as a result of
the diminution of the π electron repulsion while increasing
the π electron density favors an offset or T-shaped staking,
hence maximizing attractive π-σ interactions.
The recent growth of the field of organic electronics has
aroused a renewed interest on the understanding of weak
intermolecular interactions involving π-conjugated mole-
cules, a prerequisite to induce their self-assembly into one-
dimensional nanostructures. Face-to-face π-stacks of ex-
tended aromatics with the π-surfaces located within van der
Waals distances have emerged as promising nanowires and
are among the best performing organic semiconductors.7 In
addition, self-assembled arrays formed in solution have been
successfully transferred onto solid supports,8 resulting in
highly oriented films with important implications in the
development of molecule-based electronic devices.
precursors for the construction of triazafulleres,10 C3-sym-
metrical tripods,11 or optically active materials in electronic
devices.12 In addition, we have recently reported on the
stacking properties in solution of a number of hexaarylalk-
ynyl triindoles.13
In this paper we describe the synthesis and self-assembly of a
series of N-alkyl-substituted hexaaryltriindoles functionalized
with peripheral substituents of different electronic nature. The
electronic communication of the terminal groups with the
central electron-rich triindole core has been confirmed by
optical spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry. While these
molecules exist as monomers in CDCl3 solutions, we have
induced aggregation by adding polar solvents and therefore
facilitating the appearance of solvophobic forces in some of
these derivatives. These molecules pack in the solid state as
dimeric assemblies as has been determined by X-ray analysis of
single crystals of two different derivatives showing opposed
aggregation behavior in solution. In fact, crystallographic
packing evidences the cooperative contribution of a number
of CH-π interactions between the R-methylenic group of the
N-alkyl chains and the external rings of the triindole core.
Results and Discussion
In this context we became interested on the electron-rich
10,15-dihydro-5H-diindolo[3,2-a:30,20-c]carbazole (triindole).
This molecule can be formally considered as an extended
π-system in which three carbazole units share an aromatic
ring. Triindole-based single crystalline or liquid crystalline
materials have been found to exhibit high charge mobilities
(up to μ = 0.4 cm2 V-1 s-1) since they combine the good
hole transport properties characteristic of carbazoles with
highly ordered columnar supramolecular arrangements.9
Triindole derivatives have also been recognized as promising
Synthesis of Hexaaryltriindoles. The synthesis of the new
hexasubstituted triindoles starts from known13 symmetrical
N-dodecyl hexabromotriindole 1. The presence of six bro-
mine atoms at strategic positions in this derivative offers
varied opportunities for a versatile functionalization apply-
ing different cross-coupling methodologies.
Six-fold Suzuki coupling of 1 with a variety of phenyl-
boronic acids in the presence of Pd(PPh3)4 and 2 M aqueous
K2CO3, using THF as solvent, readily gave 2a-e (61-89%),
displaying six aryl groups surrounding a triindole nucleus in
good yield. The presence of the long alkyl chain on the
nitrogen functionalities confers to the molecule enhanced
solubility and stability and therefore facilitates the Suzuki
coupling reactions (Scheme 1).
(4) (a) Hunter, C. A.; Sanders, J. K. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112,
5525–5534. (b) Cozzi, F.; Siegel, J. Pure Appl. Chem. 1995, 67, 683–689.
(5) (a) Hunter, C. A.; Low, C. M. R.; Rotger, C.; Vinter, J. G.; Zonta, C.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 4873–4876. (b) Ma, J. C.; Dougherty,
D. A. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1303–1324.
Electronic Properties. The electronic properties of this
series of triindoles have been investigated by UV-vis ab-
sorption and fluorescence spectroscopy (Table 1, Figure 1)
and cyclic voltammetry (Figure 2 and in the Supporting
Information Figures S1-S5).
With the exception of 2e whose fluorescence is efficiently
quenched due to the presence of the nitro substituents,14 the
triindoles are well fluorescent with compound 2a displaying
an especially high fluorescence quantum yield of 0.81 in
solution.15 The large Stokes shifts between 78 and 127 nm
observed for all triindole derivatives are the consequence of
both the nuclear reorganization taking place after irradiation
and prior to emission as a result of electronic redistribution
(6) Hirota, M.; Sakaibara, K.; Suezaea, H.; Yuzuri, H.; Ankai, E.; Nishio,
M. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2000, 13, 620–623.
(7) (a) Warman, J. M.; de Haas, P. M.; Dicker, G.; Grozema, F. C.; Piris,
J.; Debije, M. G. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 4600–4609. (b) Smits, E. C. P.;
Mathijssen, S. G. J.; van Hal, P. A.; Estalles, S.; Geuns, T. C. T.; Mutsaers, K.
A. H. A.; Cantatore, E.; Wondergem, H. J.; Werzer, O.; Resel, R.; Kemerink,
M.; Kirchmeyer, S.; Muzafarov, A. M.; Ponomarenko, S. A.; de Boer, B.;
Blom, P. W. M.; de Leeuw, D. M. Nature 2008, 455, 956–959. (c) Percec, V.;
Glodde, M.; Bera, T. K.; Miura, Y.; Shiyanovskaya, I.; Singer, K. D.;
Balagurusamy, V. K.; Heiney, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 10700–
10701. (d) Xiao, S.; Myers, M.; Miao, Q.; Sanaur, S.; Pang, K.; Steigerwald,
M. L.; Nuckolls, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7390–7394. (e) Zang, L.;
Che, Y.; Moore, J. S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1596–1608. (f) Anthony, J. E.;
Brooks, J. S.; Eaton, D. L.; Parkin, S. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9482–
9483. (g) Sokolov, A.; Friscic, T.; MacGillivray, L. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 2806–2807.
(8) (a) Jonkheijm, P.; Hoeben, F. J. M.; Kleppinger, R.; van Herrikhuyzen,
J.; Schenning, A. P. H. J.; Meijer, E. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 15941–
19949. (b) Chen, Z.; Stepanenko, V.; Dehm, V.; Prins, P.; Siebbeles, L. D. A.;
€
ꢀ
ꢀ
Seibt, J.; Marquetand, P.; Engel, V.; Wurthner, F. Chem.;Eur. J. 2007, 13,
(11) Garcıa-Frutos, E. M.; Gomez-Lor, B.; Monge, A.; Gutierrez-Puebla,
E.; Alkorta, I.; Elguero, J. Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14, 8555–8561.
(12) (a) Lai, W.-Y.; He, Q.-Y.; Zhu, R.; Chen, Q.-Q.; Huang, W. Adv.
Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 265–276. (b) Levermore, P. A.; Xia, R.; Lai, W.;
Wang, X. H.; Huang, W.; Bradley, D. D. C. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2007, 40,
1896–1901.
436–449. (c) Wang, J.-Y.; Yan, J.; Li, Z.; Han, J.-M.; Ma, Y.; Bian, J.; Pei, J.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14, 7760–7764. (d) Nguyen, T.-Q.; Martel, R.; Bushey,
M.; Avouiris, P.; Carlsen, A.; Nuckolls, C.; Brus, L. Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys. 2007, 9, 1515–1532.
(9) (a) Talarico, M.; Termine, R.; Garcıa-Frutos, E. M.; Omenat, A.;
ꢀ
Serrano, J. L.; Gomez-Lor, B.; Golemme, A. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 6589–
6591. (b) Garcıa-Frutos, E. M.; Gutierrez-Puebla, E.; Monge, M. A.;
ꢀ
(13) Garcıa-Frutos, E. M.; Gomez-Lor, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 190,
9173–9177.
(14) Valeur, B., Molecular Fluorescence; Viley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany,
2002.
ꢀ
Ramırez, R.; de Andres, P.; de Andres, A.; Ramırez, R.; Gomez-Lor, B.
Org. Electron. 2009, 10, 643–652.
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
(10) Otero, G.; Biddau, G.; Sanchez-Sanchez, C.; Caillard, R.; Lopez, M.
F.; Rogero, C.; Palomares, F. J.; Cabello, N.; Basanta, M. A.; Ortega, J.;
(15) Quinine sulfate has been used as fluorescence standart, see: Velapoldi,
R. A. In Advances in Standards and Methodology in Spectrophotometry;
Burgess, C., Mielenz, K. D., Eds.; Elsevier Science Publishers: Amsterdam,
The Netherlands, 1987; pp 175-193.
ꢀ
Mendez, J.; Echavarren, A. M.; Perez, R.; Gomez-Lor, B.; Martın-Gago, J.
A. Nature 2008, 454, 865–869.
ꢀ
ꢀ
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 75, No. 4, 2010 1071