O. Mhasni, F. Rezgui / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 586–587
587
1
Table 1
O
O
R
2
2
R
DMAP-mediated allylation of b-dicarbonyl compounds with cyclic Baylis–Hillman
alcohol 1
R
DMAP, 110 ºC
OH
1
+
R
°
NO
NO
toluene, 4 A MS
2
2
Entry
Product
R1
R2
2 (yield %)
R1 = H, R2 = Et
1 = Me, R2 = Me
1
5a 62%
5b 37%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Ph
OEt
OEt
OMe
OBz
Ph
Ph
Me
Et
80
58
42
44
60
80
64
40
R
Me
Me
Me
Me
Ph
Scheme 5.
2g
2h
Me
Et
In summary, we have described a simple and direct allylic sub-
stitution of primary BH alcohols 1 and 3 with a variety of pronucle-
ophiles under modified Taber’s conditions. Work is in progress in
our laboratory to investigate the generality of this direct substitu-
tion of BH alcohols by various soft nucleophiles (i.e., amines and
thiols), and to establish suitable experimental conditions to enable
transesterification of the BH alcohols with 3-oxoesters.
O
O
1) 1,4-addition of DMAP
OH
N
2) elimination of the OH moiety
CH
3
1
I
N
CH
3
Acknowledgement
1) 1,4-addition of the nucleophile
2) elimination of DMAP
O
O
We would like to thank the DGRST, Ministry of Higher Educa-
tion, Tunisia, for financial support of this work.
OEt
Ph
O
2a
References and notes
Scheme 3.
1. (a) Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon:
New York, 1991; Vol. 4, p 585.; (b) Tsuji, J. Palladium Reagents and Catalysts
Innovations in Organic Chemistry; John Wiley: Chichester, 1995; (c) Trost, B. M.;
VanVanken, D. L. V. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 395; (d) Commandeur, C.; Thorimbert,
S.; Malacria, M. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5588; (e) Trost, B. M.; Fraisse, P. L.; Ball, Z.
T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1059; Trost, B. M.; Lee, C. In On Catalytic
Asymmetric Synthesis; Ojima, I., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 2000; Tsuji, J.. In
Handbook of Organopalladium Chemistry for Organic Synthesis; Negishi, E., Ed.;
Wiley: New York, 2000; Vol. 2, p 1669.
2. Manabe, K.; Kobayashi, S. Org. Lett. 2003, 15, 3241.
3. Ozawa, F.; Okamoto, H.; Kawagishi, S.; Yamamoto, S.; Minami, T.; Yoshifuji, M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10968.
4. Kayaki, Y.; Koda, T.; Ikariya, T. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 2595.
5. Patil, N. T.; Yamamoto, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 3101.
6. Bisaro, F.; Pretat, G.; Vitale, M.; Poli, G. Synlett 2002, 1823.
7. Yasuda, M.; Somyo, T.; Baba, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 793.
8. (a) Jana, U.; Biswas, S.; Maiti, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 4065; (b) Salehi, P.;
Iranpoor, N.; Behbahani, F. K. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 943.
The overall reaction can be described as a palladium-free Tsuji–
Trost-type process. This particular behaviour of allylic alcohol 1 to-
wards ethyl benzoylacetate, affording the monoallylation product
2a instead of the expected transesterification product, is likely
due to the presence of an electron-withdrawing group on the acti-
vated alkene, which would appear to be essential for this
transformation.
In order to investigate the scope and limitations of this simple
monoallylation method, we investigated the behaviour of acyclic
BH alcohol 322 towards 3-oxoesters (Scheme 4, Table 2, entries
1–3) and b-diketones (Scheme 4, Table 2, entries 4–6). We found
that under the above-mentioned conditions (DMAP, toluene, re-
flux, 4 Å molecular sieves), the reaction gave the allylation prod-
ucts 4a–f23 in a 68–95% yield.
9. Sanz, R.; Martínez, A.; Miguel, D.; Álvarez-Gutiérrez, J. M.; Rodr?guez, F. Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 1841.
10. (a) Rao, W.; Tay, A. H. L.; Goh, P. J.; Choy, J. M. L.; Ke, J. K.; Chan, P. W. H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 122; (b) Rao, W.; Tay, A. H. L.; Goh, P. J.; Choy, J. M.
L.; Ke, J. K.; Chan, P. W. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 5112.
This protocol was successfully extended to the reaction of allyl
alcohol 1 and other 3-oxoesters (Table 1, entries 2–4) as well as b-
diketones (Table 1, entries 5–8), leading to allylation products 2b–
h21 in moderate to good yields.
11. Motokura, K.; Fujita, N.; Mori, K.; Mizugaki, T.; Ebitani, K.; Kaneda, K. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2605.
Finally, we demonstrated that other carbon pronucleophiles,
that is, 1-nitro- and 2-nitropropanes, reacted with alcohol 1, under
the same conditions, to give nitro derivatives 5a–b in 37–62%
yields (Scheme 5).
12. Kothandaraman, P.; Rao, W.; Zhang, X.; Chan, P. W. H. Tetrahedron 2009, 65,
1833.
13. Noji, M.; Konno, Y.; Ishii, K. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 5161.
14. Shen, M.-G.; Cai, C.; Yi, W.-B. J. Fluorine Chem. 2009, 130, 595.
15. Taber, D. F.; Amedio, J. C.; Patel, Y. K. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 3618.
16. Gilbert, J. C.; Kelly, T. A. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 449.
17. Carroll, M. F. J. Chem. Soc. 1941, 507.
18. Rezgui, F.; El Ga, M. M. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 15711.
19. (a) Clemens, R. J. Chem. Rev. 1986, 86, 241; (b) Itoh, H.; Taguchi, T. Chem. Soc.
Rev. 1999, 28, 43; (c) Tsuji, J. Pure Appl. Chem. 1986, 58, 869; (d) Jung, M. E.;
Duclos, B. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 107.
1
R
O
O
O
OH
DMAP, 110 ºC
O
1
2
+
2
R
R
°
R
toluene, 4 A MS
COOEt
COOEt
20. General procedure for the allylation of carbon pronucleophiles with cyclic BH
alcohols. Preparation of compound 2a: a mixture of allyl alcohol 1 (5 mmol,
0.63 g), ethyl benzoylacetate (10 mmol, 1.92 g) and DMAP (6 mmol, 0.372 g)
was dissolved in toluene (50 mL), containing 10 g of oven-dried 4 Å molecular
sieves. The mixture was then heated under reflux for 20 h. The reaction
mixture was washed with brine and dried. The toluene was removed and the
residue was purified by column chromatography to furnish pure 2a (1.2 g,
3
4a-f
Scheme 4.
Table 2
DMAP-mediated allylation of b-dicarbonyl compounds with acyclic BH alcohol 3
80%). Viscous yellow oil; IR (CHCl3): 1737, 1699, 1600, 1448 cmÀ1
;
1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3): d 8.04–8.03 (m, 2H), 7.58–7.44 (m, 3H), 6.88 (t, J = 4.0 Hz,
1H), 4.75–4.70 (m, 1H), 4.13 (q, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 2.85–2.81 (m, 2H), 2.41–2.26
(m, 4H), 1.92–1.86 (m, 2H), 1.16 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): d
199.4, 195.5, 172.2, 149.4, 136.1, 135.7, 133.5, 128.7, 128.6, 61.1, 52.5, 38.3,
30.6, 26.0, 22.8, 14.0; MS (m/z): 300 (M+, 2), 282 (45), 255 (15), 254 (22), 226
(5), 195 (14), 149 (22), 121 (5), 105 (100), 77 (33).
Entry
Product
R1
R2
4 (yield %)
1
2
3
4
5
6
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
4f
Ph
OEt
OEt
OBz
Ph
Ph
Me
95
78
68
87
88
75
Me
Me
Me
Ph
21. Compounds 2 were fully characterized and their spectroscopic data were in
agreement with those of our previous work, see Ref. 18.
22. Villiéras, J.; Rambaud, M. Org. Synth. Coll. Vol. VIII 1993, 265.
23. Singh, V.; Batra, S. Synthesis 2006, 63.
Me