784
J.-F. Basset et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 783–785
O
O
O
PhMe,
90 °C
O
C
OH
O
OBn
17a, (2S,3R)
H
O
N
17b, (2R,3S)
OBn O
O
7
N
6
OBn OBn
TFAA,
PhMe
N
O
+
8
BnO
OBn O
20a, (2S,3R)
20b, (2R,3S)
OH
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
BnO
HO
N
1) LiN(SiMe3)2, 6
N
19
2) 9
53% two steps
10
OH
O
O
OH
9
OH
O
Scheme 2. Synthesis of diketo-1,3-dioxinone 10.
H2, Pd/C,
EtOAc
OH
OH
O
21, (2S,3R), 63% two steps
3, (2R,3S), 61% two steps15
O
O
Et3N, CH2Cl2
96%
10
O
Scheme 5. Synthesis of (ꢀ)-erythrin (21) and (+)-erythrin (3). (see above-
HO
mentioned reference for further information.)
11
OH
O
O
O
O
OMe
The two enantiomers of montagnetol, 18 and 2, were examined
for their optical rotations, compared with the natural product,
showing 2 (2R,3S) to have the true configuration. Both enantiomers
(ꢀ)-erythrin (21) and (+)-erythrin (3) were compared with an
authentic sample of erythrin, and chiral HPLC analysis was fully
consistent with the natural product configuration being (2R,3S)-
erythrin (3).
MeOH,
PhMe
1) Cs2CO3, MeOH
2) Acid work-up
87%
OMe
10
10
10
O
HO
12
13
MeOH, MS 4Å, CH2Cl2
13
sealed tube, 100 °C, 82%
OH
O
Acknowledgments
O
PhMe,
68%
We thank GlaxoSmithKline for the generous endowment (to
A.G.M.B.), GlaxoSmithKline Verona for grant support (to J.F.B.), P.
R. Haycock and R. N. Sheppard, both at Imperial College London,
for high-resolution NMR spectroscopy and Professor V. Kar-
unaratne (University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka) for generously pro-
viding a sample of the natural product (+)-erythrin.
O
14
Scheme 3. Different cyclization reactions of diketo-1,3-dioxinone 10.
O
O
OBn
OBn
3
OBn
Supplementary data
10, PhMe,
O
2
OBn
HO
110 ºC
OBn
O
OBn
15a, (2S,3R)
15b, (2R,3S)
O
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
16a, (2S,3R)
16b, (2R,3S)
References and notes
1) Cs2CO3, MeOH
2) Acid work-up
1. Choudhary, M. I.; Ali, S.; Thadani, V. M.; Karunaratne, V. U.S. Patent application
publication 0,048,332 A1, 2009.
2. Rao, S. V.; Seshadri, T. R. Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. Sect. A 1941, 13A, 199.
3. Manaktala, S. K.; Neelakantan, S.; Seshadri, T. R. Tetrahedron 1966, 22, 2373.
4. Navarro, I.; Basset, J.-F.; Hebbe, S.; Major, S. M.; Werner, T.; Howsham, C.;
Bräckow, J.; Barrett, A. G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 10293.
5. Hyatt, J. A.; Feldman, P. L.; Clemens, R. J. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 5105.
6. This activated amide intermediate exists as a 1:1 mixture of keto and enol
forms. As benzotriazole 9 is prone to decomposition, it was used directly in the
next step. The NMR analysis of intermediate 9 was measured in THF-d8.
7. Katritzky, A. R.; Wang, Z.; Wang, M.; Hall, C. D.; Suzuki, K. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70,
4854.
OH
O
OH
OH
O
OBn
OH
OBn
O
O
H2, Pd/C,
EtOAc
OH
OBn
HO
HO
17a, (2S,3R), 77%
17b, (2R,3S), 78%
18, (2S,3R), 81%
2, (2R,3S), 81%9
Scheme 4. Synthesis of (ꢀ)-montagnetol (18) and (+)-montagnetol (2). (see above-
8. It was observed that the yield decreased if benzotriazole was not removed
before column chromatography, due to aromatization to 11. To avoid this side
product, the mixture was washed with a pH 9 buffer solution to remove
benzotriazole and suppress the rate of the aromatization reaction.
mentioned reference for further information.)
9. The optical rotations of compounds 18, (2S,3R) and 2, (2R,3S) were ½a D20
ꢀ10.1
ꢁ
(acetone, c 0.5) and ½a D20
ꢁ
=+11 (acetone, c 0.4), respectively; these data were
phenol in 17a was of insufficient nucleophilicity. Consequently, a
more classical approach was applied starting from the protected
orsellinic acid 1913 which underwent an esterification reaction
with phenol 17a or 17b using activation with trifluoroacetic
anhydride14 to provide the diesters 20a and 20b, respectively. Deb-
enzylation by hydrogenolysis afforded 21 and 3, respectively
(Scheme 5).
compared with those of the isolated natural (+)-montagnetol2
(acetone).
½ ꢁ +12.6
a 2D0
10. Soriente, A.; De Rosa, M.; Trincone, A.; Sodano, G. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1995,
5, 2321.
11. Compounds 16a and 16b are stable at room temperature, but are very sensitive
to base or acid.
12. Deuterium exchange occurs in methanol-d4 leading to the disappearance of the
keto–enol proton in the proton NMR spectrum.