1176
T. S. Reger et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 1173–1176
Table 3
Acknowledgment
Off-rate determination for selected compounds
Compd
Off-ratea (%)
We thank Dr. William Hagmann for critical reading of this
Letter.
5d
5g
5i
10
35
65
85
60
15
34
38
85
67
72
85
References and notes
5j
5k
5m
5n
5o
5p
5q
5r
1. (a) Hemler, M. E.; Elices, M. J.; Parker, C.; Takada, Y. Immunol. Rev. 1990, 114,
45; (b) Elices, M. J. Curr. Opin. Anti-inflam. Immun. 1999, 1, 15.
2. (a) Gearing, A. J. H.; Newman, W. Immunol. Today 1993, 14, 506; (b) Hemler, M.
E. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1990, 8, 365.
3. (a) Abraham, W. M.; Ahmed, A.; Sielczak, M. W.; Narita, M.; Arrhenius, T.;
Elices, M. J. Am. J. Resp. Crit. Care Med. 1997, 156, 696; (b) Koo, G. C.; Shah, K.;
Ding, G. J.; Xiao, J.; Wnek, R.; Doherty, G.; Tong, X. C.; Pepinsky, R. B.; Lin, K. C.;
Hagmann, W. K.; Kawka, D.; Singer, I. I. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2003, 167,
1400.
5s
a
4. Seiffge, D. J. Rheum. 1996, 23, 2086.
Bound at 3 h; see Ref. 8 for a description of this assay
5. (a) Pedolsky, D.; Lobb, R. R.; King, N.; Benjamin, C.; Pepinsky, R. B.; Sehgal, P.;
deBeaumont, M. J. Clin. Invest. 1993, 92, 372; (b) Leone, D. R.; Giza, K.; Gill, A.;
Dolinski, B. M.; Yang, W.; Perper, S.; Scott, D. M.; Lee, W. C.; Cornebise, M.;
Wortham, K.; Nickerson-Nutter, C.; Chen, L. L.; LePage, D.; Spell, J. C.; Whalley,
E. T.; Petter, R. C.; Adams, S. P.; Lobb, R. R.; Pepinsky, R. B. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
2003, 305, 1150.
6. (a) Miller, D. H.; Khan, O. A.; Sheremata, W. A.; Blumhardt, L. D.; Rice, G. P.;
Libonati, M. A.; Willmer-Hulme, A. J.; Dalton, C. M.; Miszkiel, K. A.; O’Connor, P.
W. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 348, 15; (b) Sandborn, W. J.; Colombel, J. F.; Enns, R.;
Feagan, B. G.; Hanauer, S. B.; Lawrance, I. C.; Panaccione, R.; Sanders, M.;
Schreiber, S.; Targan, S.; van Deventer, S.; Goldblum, R.; Despain, D.; Hogge, G.
S.; Rutgeerts, P. N. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 353, 1912.
100
80
60
40
7. (a) Doherty, G. A.; Yang, G. X.; Borges, E.; Tong, S.; McCauley, E. D.; Treonze, K.
M.; Van Riper, G.; Pacholok, S.; Si, Q.; Koo, G. C.; Shah, K.; Mumford, R. A.;
Hagmann, W. K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 1891; (b) Hagmann, W. K.
Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2004, 4, 1461; (c) Venkatraman, S.; Lebsack, A. D.; Alves,
K.; Gardner, M. F.; James, J.; Lingham, R. B.; Maniar, S.; Mumford, R. A.; Si, Q.;
Stock, N.; Treonze, K. M.; Wang, B.; Zunic, J.; Munoz, B. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2009, 19, 5803.
8. Lin, L. S.; Lanza, T., Jr.; Jewell, J. P.; Liu, P.; Jones, C.; Kieczykowski, G. R.;
Treonze, K.; Si, Q.; Manior, S.; Koo, G.; Tong, X.; Wang, J.; Schuelke, A.;
Pivnichny, J.; Wang, R.; Raab, C.; Vincent, S.; Davies, P.; MacCoss, M.; Mumford,
R. A.; Hagmann, W. K. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 3449.
20
5 mpk 5j-Et
5 mpk 5j
0
0
3
6
9
12
24
Time (h)
Figure 1. Rat receptor occupancy of 5j from dosing of acid 5j or ethyl ester prodrug
5j–Et
9. Riley, R. J.; Grime, K.; Weaver, R. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2007, 3, 51.
10. Bensoussan, C.; Delaforge, M.; Mansuy, D. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1995, 49, 591.
11. We targeted kobs (10
prodrugs. By comparison, the TDI rate for the ethyl ester of 1 was 0.040 minÀ1
l
M) values of less than 0.020 minÀ1 for TDI by ethyl ester
Table 4
Rat pharmacokinetics of 5j
.
12. For discussions on the regioselectivity of 1,2,4-triazole and tetrazole alkylation,
see: (a) Bulger, P. G.; Cottrell, I. F.; Cowden, C. J.; Davies, A. J.; Dolling, U.-H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 1297; (b) Ulhaq, S.; Chinje, E. C.; Naylor, M. A.; Jaffar,
M.; Stratford, I. J.; Threadgill, M. D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 6, 2139.
13. We have previously demonstrated that this class of compounds generally has a
higher affinity for the activated state of VLA-4. Thus, potency was examined
only against the resting state of VLA-4 to best differentiate compounds.
14. The [125I]-tracer shown below was utilized to assess binding potency, receptor
off-rate, and rat receptor occupancy. A detailed description of each of these
experiments was recently provided in the Supplementary data of Ref. 8.
Compound dosed (5 mpk po)
Systemic Cmax (nM)
Portal vein Cmax (nM)
Acid 5j
Ester 5j–Et
3
12
245
397
or prodrug 5j–Et in rats. Levels of 5j are substantially higher in the
portal vein than in systemic circulation. This is critical as we be-
lieve that the slow off-rate and initial exposure of 5j to lympho-
cytes bearing VLA-4 in the portal vein combine to provide the
observed high levels of receptor occupancy in rats.
In summary, tertiary heterocycle-substituted proline dipeptides
were shown to be potent antagonists of VLA-4. Acid 5j had the
optimal profile, displaying excellent potency and a slow off-rate
from human VLA-4. The ester prodrug 5j–Et had reduced TDI of
CYP3A4 and gave sustained (12–24 h) receptor occupancy when
dosed to rats. We have recently characterized the intrinsic and
pharmacologic properties of this compound against equine VLA-
4.15 Results described therein suggest that 5j may have utility for
the treatment of recurring airway obstruction in horses.
15. Treonze, K. M.; Alves, K.; Fischer, P.; Hagmann, W. K.; Hora, D.; Kulick, A.;
Vakerich, K.; Smith, N. D.; Lingham, R. B.; Maniar, S.; Reger, T. S.; Zunic, J.;
Munoz, B.; Prasit, P.; Nicholson, D.; Si, Q.; Judd, K.; Nicolich, S.; Kellerhouse, P.;
Thompson, D.; Mumford, R. A. Vet. Immun. Immunopath. 2009, 130, 79.