lysts for organic synthesis are well recognized.13 Lipases can
be used in a wide variety of organic solvents without the
need for coenzymes for their activity.14 Lipases combine
broad substrate recognition with high efficiency and selectiv-
ity. Therefore, lipases offer an excellent alternative to
classical organic techniques in the selective transformation
of complex molecules. Lipases are the most frequently used
enzymes in organic synthesis because of their stability, ready
availability, and their acceptance of a broad range of
substrates.15 The use of lipases is now well established in
transesterification,16 ester hydrolysis,17 numerous applications
in kinetic resolutions18 or enantioselectivity syntheses based
on meso compounds,19 and amidation of racemic esters or
amine,20,21 but their application in Knoevenagel condensation
has not been well explored. We focused our attention on
the condensation of 4,4′-hexylimino-bisbenzaldehyde using
lipase from Aspergillus oryzae with different active meth-
ylene compounds.
Ionic liquids have recently attracted increasing interest in
the context of green synthesis. Ionic liquids were initially
introduced as alternative green reaction media because of
their unique chemical and physical properties of nonvolatility,
nonflammability, thermal stability, and controlled miscibil-
ity.22 Deep eutectic solvents (DESs), effectively eutectics
formed between the two components, result in a very large
depression of freezing point which can be in the region of
200 °C. The interaction between the ammonium salt and the
hydrogen-bond donor is an example. Deep eutectic solvents
have physical and solvent properties similar to those of ionic
liquids formed with discrete ions. Abbott et al.23 published
a series of studies on the low melting point of deep eutectic
liquid systems based on choline chloride ([Ch][Cl]). Choline
is a naturally occurring biocompatible compound that is not
hazardous if it is released back into nature as choline or its
deep eutectic mixture.24 Urea is a compound present in all
animals. Because choline chloride and urea are both inex-
pensive, processes that use this deep eutectic solvent are also
economically viable. Many ionic liquids leave hazardous
materials in the environment. Their toxicity is similar to or
higher than that of organic solvents.25,26 An alternative
approach to overcome these drawbacks is the development
of a deep eutectic solvent from components that are nontoxic
to the environment, possess biodegradable properties, or are
obtained from biodegradable resources, and are readily
available and inexpensive. The ability of a deep eutectic
mixture to serve as a solvent has not been extensively
explored in the field of synthetic organic chemistry. We now
report a Knoevenagel reaction using a deep eutectic solvent.
A series of novel diphenylamine-based chromophores a-k
was synthesized in which the acceptors were attached to the
central diphenylamine group by a traditional Knoevenagel
condensation using piperidine as the base in ethanol solvent at
reflux temperature. Three different types of active methylene
compounds, i.e., aliphatic, substituted phenyl acetonitrile, and
isophorone-based active methylene compounds, were introduced
at the peripheral phenyl groups. The results of the experiments
are summarized in Table 1. Use of the conventional method
required a higher temperature and longer reaction time; how-
ever, in some cases (c and h-k) reaction time using the
conventional method was shorter as compared to the lipase-
catalyzed reaction. The lowest yield observed in b and c in the
lipase-catalyzed reaction may be attributed to the weaker nature
of the active methylene compound due to the presence of amide
linkage. In entry i, the yield is markedly less due to the weaker
nature of active methylene compound.
A biocatalyst was used to explore its synthetic utility in
Knoevenagel condensation. The reaction mechanism of the
condensation using a biocatalyst involved a sequential dehydra-
tion process. The active site of lipase functions as a nucleophile,
which condenses the acidic proton of the active methylene
group, and then dehydration gives a carbon-carbon double
bond. To optimize the reaction parameters, the reaction of 4,4′-
hexyliminobisbenzaldehyde with ethyl cyano acetate in the
presence of lipase was selected as a model reaction. Optimum
results were obtained when reactions were conducted in the
presence of 50 mg (10% by weight of aldehyde) of lipase for
4.72 mmol of aldehyde at 50-55 °C. No major change in the
product yield was observed when 20% (by weight of aldehyde)
lipase catalyst was used. No product formed when the reaction
mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 15 h in the absence of lipase.
Under the optimum conditions, aldehyde was condensed with
different active methylene groups in the presence of lipase,
giving moderate to good yield of the product. To make the
biocatalytic processes more economical on a large scale, the
recyclability of lipase must be considered. During this study,
lipase was recycled for up to four cycles. There was no
significant decrease in product yield after completion of the first
cycle, but the yield declined up to 50% after the completion of
the fourth cycle (Table 3).
(10) Wong, C. H. Science 1989, 244, 145
.
(11) Jones, J. B. Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 3351.
(12) Chen, C.-S.; Sih, C. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1989, 28, 695.
(13) Whitesides, G. M.; Wong, C.-H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1985,
24, 61.
(14) For reviews, see: (a) Biotransformations in Organic Chemistry, 5th
ed.; Faber, K., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, 2004; pp 94-123, 344. (b) Enzyme
Catalysis in Organic Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Gais, H. J., Theil, F., Drauz, K.,
Waldmann, H., Eds. Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2002; p 335.
(15) Klibanov, A. M. Chemtech. 1986, 16, 354.
(16) Chen, C. S.; Sih, C. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1989, 28,
695.
(17) For a recent review, see: Fang, J.-M.; Wong, C.-H. Synlett 1994, 393.
(18) Whitesides, G. M.; Wang, C.-H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1985,
24, 617. Enzymes as Catalysts in Organic Synthesis; Schneider, M. P., Ed.;
Reidel: Dordrecht, FRG, 1986.
(19) (a) Brown, K. J.; Berry, M. S.; Murdoch, J. R. J. Org. Chem. 1985,
50, 4345. (b) Smrcina, M.; Lorenc, M.; Hanus, V.; Sedmera, P.; Kocovsky,
P. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 1917. (c) Oi, S.; Matsuzaka, Y.; Yamashita, J.;
Miyano, S. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1989, 62, 956.
(20) (a) Davies, H. G.; Green, R. H.; Kelly, D. R. Roberts, S. M.
Biotransformations in PreparatiVe Organic Chemistry; Academic Press: New
York, 1989. (b) Ahern, J. J.; Klibanov, A. M. Science 1985, 228, 1280
.
(21) De Castro, M. S.; Gago, J. V. S. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 2877
(22) Wilson, C. V. Org. Synth. 1955, 3, 575.
.
(25) (a) Welton, T. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 2071. (b) Burrell, A.; Del Sesto,
(23) Abbott, A.; Capper, G.; Davies, Munro, D.; Rasheed, H. R.;
Tambyrajah, V. Chem. Commun. 2001, 2010.
R.; Baker, S.; McCleskey, T. M.; Baker, G. A. Green Chem. 2007, 9, 449.
(26) (a) Jain, N.; Kumar, A.; Chauhan, S. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 1015.
(b) Ranu, B.; Jana, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 3767. (c) Li, Y.; Xu, X.;
Zhou, M. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2003, 448. (d) Ce, S.; Zhen-Chu, C.; Qin-Guo,
Z. Synthesis 2003, 4, 555. (e) Cai, Y.; Peng, Y.; Song, G. Catal. Lett. 2006,
(24) (a) Ranke, J.; Stolte, S.; Stormann, R.; Arning, J.; Jastorff, B. Chem.
ReV. 2007, 107, 2183–2206. (b) Stolte, S.; Arning, J.; Bottin-Weber, U.;
Matzke, M.; Stock, F.; Thiele, K.; Uerdingen, M.; Welz-Biermann, U.;
Jastorff, B.; Ranke, J. Green Chem. 2006, 8, 621.
109, 61
.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 7, 2010
1457