(Rint = 0.062), R = 0.0386, wR2 = 0.0767 (all data); CCDC 735997.
[2]PF6: C63H51ClN3P4RhꢃF6Pꢃ3(CH2Cl2), FW = 1512.06, 0.26 ꢄ 0.31 ꢄ
ꢀ
0.32 mm, T = 110 K, triclinic, P1, a = 13.2110(6)A, b = 15.3608(8)A,
c = 17.6791(10)A, a = 93.963(2)1, b = 110.874(2)1, g = 101.654(3)1,
=
V = 3243.8(3)A3, Z = 2, 14 892 reflections, 83 759 unique (Rint
0.024), R = 0.0309, wR2 = 0.0759 (all data); CCDC 735998.
Scheme 2 Activation of H2 by complex [2]PF6, resulting in the
formation of RhIII complex 3 via intermediacy of species 2.
1 R. H. Crabtree, The Organometallic Chemistry of the
Transition Metals, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 3rd edn, 2001,
pp. 152–155.
2 For an overview of H2 activation by frustrated Lewis pairs, see:
D. W. Stephan and G. Erker, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 46.
3 R. Noyori, M. Kitamura and T. Ohkuma, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U. S. A., 2004, 101, 5356; R. J. Hamilton and S. H. Bergens, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 11979.
protected metalloradical species should differ substantially
from that proposed by Rauchfuss for H2 oxidation by an
Ir-based ligand-centered radical species.18 The redox-potential
of [2]PF6 vs. NHE is 0.28 V, which implies that the overall
oxidation of H2 to 2H+ is thermodynamically allowed even
without subsequent metal protonation. The process might
thus involve the concerted trimolecular two-electron oxidation
of H2 simultaneously by two complexes 2+ (which may
proceed over a rather long distance between the species so
that steric hindrance plays a minor role). However, we cannot
completely exclude other mechanisms, such as two consecutive
4 A. Wu, J. Masland, R. D. Swartz, W. Kaminsky and J. M. Mayer,
Inorg. Chem., 2007, 46, 11190, and references therein.
5 J. I. van der Vlugt, T. Koblenz, J. Wassenaar and J. N. H. Reek,
in Molecular Encapsulation: Reactions in Constrained Systems,
ed. J.-L. Mieusset and U. H. Brinker, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
2009, in press; T. Koblenz, J. Wassenaar and J. N. H. Reek, Chem.
Soc. Rev., 2008, 37, 247; M. Kuil, T. Soltner, P. W. N. M. van
Leeuwen and J. N. H. Reek, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 11344;
K. Drauz and H. Waldmann, Enzyme Catalysis in Organic Synthesis:
A Comprehensive Handbook, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2nd edn, 2002.
6 S. Trofimenko, Chem. Rev., 1993, 93, 943; C. Moberg, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 248; I. Kuzu, I. Krummenacher,
J. Meyer, F. Armbruster and F. Breher, Dalton Trans., 2008, 5836.
7 L. Turculet, J. D. Feldman and T. D. Tilley, Organometallics,
2004, 23, 2488; C. Foltz, M. Enders, S. Bellemin-Laponnaz,
H. Wadepohl and L. H. Gade, Chem.–Eur. J., 2007, 13, 5994;
C. C. Lu, C. T. Saouma, M. W. Day and J. C. Peters, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2007, 129, 4; M. Sircoglou, S. Bontemps, G. Bouhadir,
N. Saffon, K. Miqueu, W. X. Gu, M. Mercy, C. H. Chen,
B. M. Foxman, L. Maron, O. V. Ozerov and D. Bourissou,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 16729.
bimolecular single-electron transfer steps. The formation of
+
ꢂ
high-energy species (H2 , or Hꢂ after immediate proton
transfer to RhI) in the latter case speaks against such a
stepwise process, but this could be possible if tunneling is
involved. Direct homolytic splitting of H2, as observed for
RhII–porphyrin systems,19 also seems less likely, because this
reaction should suffer from extensive steric shielding provided
by the ligand protecting the RhII center (again, unless tunnel-
ing is involved). We are currently investigating possibilities to
apply the observed activation of dihydrogen by RhII metallo-
radicals based on these novel, modular tripodal phosphorus
ligands for hydrogen atom-transfer (HAT) reactions.
8 M. J. Baker and P. G. Pringle, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1993,
314; R. B. King and R. N. Kapoor, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1969, 91, 5191;
J. W. Dawson and L. M. Venanzi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1968, 90, 7229.
9 M. Ciclosi, J. Lloret, F. Estevan, P. Lahuerta, M. Sanau
J. Perez-Prieto, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 6741; M. Ciclosi,
F. Estevan, P. Lahuerta, V. Passarelli, J. Perez-Prieto and
M. Sanau, Dalton Trans., 2009, 2290.
´ and
Summarizing, we have reported the straightforward syn-
thesis of a mononuclear RhI complex 2 and the corresponding
stable RhII species 2+, based on a novel tripodal, tetradentate
phosphorus ligand 1. The isolated metalloradical complex 2+
is a rare RhIICl compound with an unusual intermediate
coordination geometry. Notwithstanding its bench-stable
character, 2+ reacts with molecular hydrogen to quantitatively
form the corresponding RhIII hydrochloride complex 3. This is
the first example of dihydrogen activation by a metal-centered
RhII metalloradical, which may proceed through complete
oxidation of molecular hydrogen followed by protonation of
the resulting RhI species. This reaction can be considered as a
starting point of HAT reactions, using molecular hydrogen as
hydrogen atom donor. Further studies aimed at the reactivity
of these unusual RhII metalloradicals are ongoing, including
studies derived from the related cationic RhI species. More-
over, we are investigating the use of enantiomerically pure
C3-symmetric derivatives of 1 in asymmetric transformations.
This research was supported by the NRSC-C and NWO-CW.
We thank Dr D. G. H. Hetterscheid, J. W. H. Peeters and
T. Mahabiersing for technical assistance.
´
´
´
10 J. Wassenaar and J. N. H. Reek, Dalton Trans., 2007, 3750;
J. Wassenaar, M. Kuil and J. N. H. Reek, Adv. Synth. Catal.,
2008, 350, 1610; J. Wassenaar, S. van Zutphen, G. Mora, P. Le
Floch, M. Siegler, A. L. Spek and J. N. H. Reek, Organometallics,
2009, 28, 2724; J. Wassenaar and J. N. H. Reek, J. Org. Chem.,
2009, 74, 8403.
11 A. R. Katritzky, K. Akutagawa and R. A. Jones, Synth. Commun.,
1988, 18, 1151; J. O. Yu, C. S. Browning and D. H. Farrar, Chem.
Commun., 2008, 1020.
12 B. de Bruin, P. H. M. Budzelaar and A. W. Gal, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 4142; H. R. L. Davies and J. R. Manning,
Nature, 2008, 451, 417; H. R. L. Davies and S. J. Hedley, Chem.
Soc. Rev., 2007, 36, 1109; C. A. Merlic and A. L. Zechman,
Synthesis, 2003, 1137.
13 W. I. Dzik, J. M. M. Smits, J. N. H. Reek and B. de Bruin,
Organometallics, 2009, 28, 1631; W. I. Dzik, J. N. H. Reek and
B. de Bruin, Chem.–Eur. J., 2008, 14, 7594.
14 A. W. Addison, T. N. Rao, J. Reedijk, J. van Rijn and
G. C. Verschoor, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1984, 1349.
15 D. F. Evans, J. Chem. Soc., 1959, 2003.
16 The meff value is similar to that of a PNP-based mononuclear RhII
species, see: M. Feller, E. Ben-Ari, T. Gupta, L. J. W. Shimon,
G. Leitus, Y. Diskin-Posner, L. Weiner and D. Milstein, Inorg.
Chem., 2007, 46, 10479.
17 D. G. H. Hetterscheid, A. J. J. Koekoek, H. Grutzmacher and
¨
Notes and references
B. de Bruin, Prog. Inorg. Chem., 2007, 55, 247.
18 M. R. Ringenberg, S. Latha Kokatam, Z. M. Heiden and
T. B. Rauchfuss, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 788.
19 W. Cui and B. B. Wayland, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 8266,
and references therein.
z Crystal data. 2: C63H51ClN3P4RhꢃCH2Cl2, FW
= 1197.23,
, a = 11.8086(5),
0.10 ꢄ 0.14 ꢄ 0.27 mm, T = 110 K, triclinic, P1
ꢀ
b = 14.6492(4), c = 17.0348(5) A, a = 83.286(2)1, b = 87.505(2)1, g =
71.163(2)1, V = 2769.79(17)A3, Z = 2, 12 704 reflections, 62 878 unique
ꢁc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
1234 | Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 1232–1234