Perfectly Regioselective and Sequential Protection of Glucopyranosides
2005, 61, 6839–6853; d) W. Muramatsu, T. Kawabata, Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 2007, 48, 5031–5033.
83% yield. On the other hand, attempted azide substitution
of the hydroxy group at C(2) of 13 gave 1-azido-2-octylthio
[5]
a) T. Kurahashi, T. Mizutani, J. Yoshida, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin
Trans. 1 1999, 465–473; b) T. Kurahashi, T. Mizutani, J. Yosh-
ida, Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 8669–8677; c) E. Kattnig, M. Albert,
Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 945–948; d) K. S. Griswold, S. J. Miller, Tet-
rahedron 2003, 59, 8869–8875; e) Y. Demizu, Y. Kubo, H. Mi-
yoshi, T. Maki, Y. Matsumura, N. Moriyama, O. Onomura,
Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 5075–5077.
For pioneering examples of regioselective manipulation of po-
lyols, see: a) C. A. Lewis, S. J. Miller, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2006, 45, 5616–5619; b) K. W. Fiori, A. L. A. Puchlopek, S. J.
Miller, Nature Chem. 2009, 1, 630–634.
Among the various anhydrides examined, isobutyric anhydride
gave the best selectivity in our previous studies on the kinetic
resolution of racemic alcohols and regioselective acylation of
carbohydrates, see: a) T. Kawabata, M. Nagato, K. Takasu, K.
Fuji, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3169–3170; b) T. Kawabata,
K. Yamamoto, Y. Momose, Y. Nagaoka, H. Yoshida, K. Fuji,
Chem. Commun. 2001, 2700–2701; c) T. Kawabata, R. Stragies,
T. Fukaya, K. Fuji, Chirality 2003, 15, 71–76; d) T. Kawabata,
R. Stragies, T. Fukaya, Y. Nagaoka, H. Schedel, K. Fuji, Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2003, 44, 1545–1548; e) T. Kawabata, W. Muram-
atsu, T. Nishio, T. Shibata, Y. Uruno, R. Stragies, Synthesis
2008, 747–753; f) ref.[1]
The reasons why isobutyric anhydride usually gives better re-
sults in selective acylation are not clear. We assume that it may
be due to its steric effects as well as its high kcat/kuncat ratio,
see: C. B. Fischer, S. Xu, H. Zipse, Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12,
5779–5784.
derivative 22 by rearrangement of the octylthio group in
64% yield.[15] Glycosyl azide 22 is expected to be a versatile
intermediate for the synthesis of oligosaccharides contain-
ing an N-glycosyltriazole linkage and also to be a protected
glycosyl donor under enzyme-catalyzed glycosidation.[16]
Fully protected galactose derivative 23 was also obtained
from 14 under Mitsunobu conditions in 62% yield, which
may be a potentially useful intermediate for the synthesis
of galactose-containing oligosaccharides.
[6]
[7]
Conclusions
We have developed a method for highly regioselective
and sequential introduction of four different protective
groups onto four hydroxy groups of glycopyranosides. Each
of the protective groups of the orthogonally protected gluc-
opyranosides was readily removed to give the correspond-
ing mono-ols with three different protective groups, which
are possible intermediates for the synthesis of natural and
modified oligosaccharides with structural diversity. This
method provides a new way for regioselective manipulation
of carbohydrates.
[8]
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this arti-
cle): Experimental procedures and characterization data for all new
compounds.
[9]
For an excellent review on chiral PPY and DMAP analogues
in asymmetric synthesis, see: R. P. Wurz, Chem. Rev. 2007, 107,
5570–5595.
[10]
The C(4)-OCOiPr group is assumed to be located closer to the
C(3)-OH group due to the buttressing effect of the neighboring
bulky TBDPS group at C(6).
Acknowledgments
[11]
[12]
For an example, see: K. C. Nicolaou, S. P. Seitz, D. P. Papa-
hatjis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 2430–2434.
a) C. L. Stevens, P. Blumbergs, D. H. Otterbach, J. L. Strom-
inger, M. Matsuhashi, D. X. Dietzler, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964,
86, 2937–2938; b) R. J. Ferrier, Carbohydr. Chem. 2003, 34,
118–135.
S. Dedola, S. A. Nepogodiev, R. A. Field, Org. Biomol. Chem.
2007, 5, 1006–1017.
H. C. Kolb, M. G. Finn, K. B. Sharpless, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2001, 40, 2004–2021.
The rearrangement of the octylthio group of thioglucopyranos-
ides has been reported, see: K. C. Nicolaou, T. Ladduwahetty,
J. L. Randall, A. Chucholowski, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108,
2466–2467.
P. Fialová, A. T. Carmona, I. Robina, R. Ettrich, P. Sedmera,
V. Prikrylová, L. Petrásková-Husáková, V. Kren, Tetrahedron
Lett. 2005, 46, 8715–8718.
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research
(A) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and
Technology, Japan.
[1] a) T. Kawabata, W. Muramatsu, T. Nishio, T. Shibata, H.
Schedel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12890–12895; b) T. Ka-
wabata, T. Furuta, Chem. Lett. 2009, 38, 640–647.
[2] a) C.-H. Wong, X.-S. Ye, Z. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 7137–7138; b) C.-C. Wang, J.-C. Lee, S.-Y. Luo, S. S. Kulk-
arni, Y.-W. Huang, C.-C. Lee, K.-L. Chang, S.-C. Hung, Na-
ture 2007, 446, 896–899; c) A. Français, D. Urban, J.-M. Beau,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8662–8665.
[3] For an excellent review, see: U. T. Bornscheuer, R. J.
Kazlauskas, Hydrolases in Organic Synthesis, Wiley-VCH,
Weinheim, 2006, pp. 141–159.
[4] a) G. Hu, A. Vesella, Helv. Chim. Acta 2003, 86, 4369–4391;
b) N. Moitessier, Y. Chapleur, Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 1731–
1735; c) N. Moitessier, P. Englebienne, Y. Chapleur, Tetrahedron
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
Received: December 1, 2009
Published Online: January 12, 2010
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 827–831
© 2010 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.eurjoc.org
831