3592 Macromolecules, Vol. 43, No. 8, 2010
Communication
Figure 2. UV-vis spectra of polymer 5 before (red) and after (black)
the addition of 1.0 equiv of 4 (per repeat unit) as well as model com-
pounds 6 (green) and 7 (blue) in DMF.
Figure 1. Gel permeation chromatograms (eluent: 0.1 M LiBr in DMF;
rate: 1.0 mL/min): (a) polymer 5; (b) polymer 5 with 1.0 equiv of 4
(per repeat unit); (c) solution obtained from (b) after the addition of 1.0
equiv of 3 (per repeat unit); (d) solution obtained from (c) after the
addition of 1.0 equiv of 4 (per repeat unit); (e) solution obtained from
(d) after the addition of 1.0 equiv of 3 (per repeat unit).
aforementioned polymerization reactions at higher concentrations
([total monomer]0 up to 0.8 M).
Figure 3. Synthesis of the model compound 7 used to evaluate the elec-
tronic structure of polymer 5. R = CH2C(CH3)2C2H5. R0 = n-C6H13
.
We next probed the structurally dynamic characteristics of 5.15
Heating a DMF solution of this polymer (Mn=14.8 kDa; PDI=
2.1) to 120 °C in the presence of 1.0 equiv of 4 (relative to the
polymer’s repeat unit) resulted in a significant decrease in the
polymer’s MW. Analysis of the crude reaction mixture by GPC
resolved a series of low-MW peaks ranging from 1.5 to 6.1 kDa,
of which the predominant peak was attributed to 6 (isolated from
the reaction mixture and compared to an authentic sample; see
below). Subsequent addition of 3 to the aforementioned reaction
mixture resulted in the re-formation of polymer 5 with a Mn =
18.0 kDa (PDI = 2.9). Owing to the high fidelity of the NHC-
isothiocyanate coupling reaction, these depolymerization/polym-
erization cycles were repeated twice on the same samples. Ana-
logous results were obtained when 5 was depolymerized with 3
and then treated with 4 to re-establish the formation of polymer.
In parallel with molecular weight measurements, the afore-
mentioned depolymerization/polymerization reactions were
monitored via UV-vis spectroscopy (see Figure 2). Polymer 5
exhibited a λmax =410 nm (in DMF). However, upon depolym-
erization via treatment of 5 with excess 4, as described above, this
value shifted hypsochromically to 392 nm. Qualitatively, the
longer λmax of the polymer suggested that the effective conjugation
length of these materials exceeded that of their lower MW
analogues.
To gain additional insight into the electronic structure of this
polymeric material, model compounds 6 and 7, which approxi-
mate two possible repeating units of polymer 5, were synthesized.
The former was prepared by adding an excess (4.0 equiv) of 4 to a
THF solution (14 mM) of 3, followed by purification via column
chromatography. As shown in Figure 3, compound 7 was synthe-
sized by treating 1,3-di(2,2-dimethylbutyl)benzimidazolium tetra-
fluoroborate with sodium tert-butoxide (to generate the res-
pective NHC in situ) in THF followed by the addition of 0.3 equiv
of 4. Analysis of 6 via UV-vis spectroscopy revealed a λmax at
382 nm (DMF), a result which indicated that its effective chromo-
phore is shorter than that of 5. In contrast, the UV-vis spectrum
of 7 (λmax = 409 nm in DMF) was found to be similar to that
exhibited by the polymer. Hence, although polymer 5 is formally
conjugated, it appears to be comprised of repeating units that
are related to 7 and that these repeating units exhibit minimal
π-overlap with each other.16 The limited long-range electronic
communication does not prohibit the polymer’s ability to con-
duct electrical charge, however. For example, while thin (5 μm)
films of 5 were found to be nonconductive (σ < 10-10 S/cm),
exposure to iodine vapor increased the material’s electrical
conductivity to σ = 1.7 mS/cm, as determined using a four-point
probe technique.17 We are currently investigating other dopants
which could provide additional insight into the charge transfer
mechanisms exhibited by these doped materials.18
In conclusion, we have developed a new class of aromatic poly-
mers using NHC-isothiocyanate coupling chemistry. Simple
combination of bis(NHC)s with complementary bis(isothio-
cyanates)s produced polymers that were found to be structurally
dynamic. These results expand the utilities of free bis(NHC)s as
polymer building blocks and create a new design strategy for
accessing polyelectrolytes with charges as integral components of
their main chains.19 The polymerization reaction reported herein
is one of the few examples where chemical unsaturation is
maintained as monomer is converted to polymer and remains
poised for adaptation into a system that affords a structurally
reversible, conjugated polymer. Efforts toward these goals will
focus on increasing the effective conjugation length in the afore-
mentioned materials, principally via desymmetrization of the
NHC N-substituents as well as through varying the electronic
properties of the bis(NHC) and bis(isothiocyanate) monomers.
Acknowledgment. We are grateful to the ONR (N00014-08-1-
0729), the NSF (CHE-0645563), the Welch Foundation (F-1621),
and the Beckman Foundation for their generous financial support.
C.W.B. is a Cottrell Scholar of Research Corporation.
Supporting Information Available: Detailed experimental
procedures and characterization of all new compounds. This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
References and Notes
(1) (a) White, S. R.; Sottos, N. R.; Geubelle, P. H.; Moore, J. S.;
Kessler, M. R.; Sriram, S. R.; Brown, E. N.; Viswanathan, S.
Nature 2001, 409, 794. (b) Chen, X.; Dam, M. A.; Ono, K.; Mal, A.;
Shen, H.; Nutt, S. R.; Sheran, K.; Wudl, F. Science 2002, 295, 1698.
(c) Caruso, M. M.; Schelkopf, S. R.; Jackson, A. C.; Landry, A. M.;
Braun, P. V.; Moore, J. S. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 6093.
ꢀ
(2) Miaudet, P.; Derre, A.; Maugey, M.; Zakri, C.; Piccione, P. M.;
Inoubli, R.; Poulin, P. Science 2007, 318, 1294.
(3) (a) Nair, K. P.; Breedveld, V.; Weck, M. Macromolecules 2008, 41,
3429. (b) Scott, T. F.; Schneider, A. D.; Cook, W. D.; Bowman, C. N.
Science 2005, 308, 1615. (c) Skene, W. G.; Lehn, J.-M. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 8270. (d) Otsuka, H.; Aotani, K.; Higaki,
Y.; Takahara, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4064. (e) Rowan, S. J.;