daily exposure of patients to palladium, 100 µg·day-1 for
oral doses and 10 µg·day-1 for parenterally administered
drugs.5 On the basis of these guidelines, the pharmaceutical
industry generally needs to achieve less than 10 and 1 ppm,
for oral and parentral drug substances, respectively. For large
scale synthesis, it is best to avoid the use of Pd during the
last three steps and place Pd-coupling reactions early in the
process in hopes of reducing the amount of metal throughout
the synthesis. On a practical level, when a synthetic scheme
requires the use of a metal such as Pd at the end of a synthesis
and the standards of metal content permitted in the API are
exceeded, it is necessary to find empirically a disposal
method such as nanofiltration or use scavenging agents,
which is costly in time and money.6
The amino substituent was directly introduced in place of
the ortho-fluoro/methoxy group in fair-to-excellent yields
(Table 1).
LiNEt2, LiN(CH2CH2)2NMe, LiNMeBn, and LiNBn2
readily displaced the fluorine of the lithium salt of 2-fluo-
robenzoic acid (1) at -50 °C to give anthranilic acids 3-6
(entries 1-4). Lithium arylamides and diarylamides entered
into the displacement reaction with benzoate 1 under
somewhat forcing conditions (50-60 °C, entries 5 and 6).
This may be attributed to lower pKa values in comparison
to dialkylamines.14 Most striking are those examples using
so-called “nonnucleophilic” bases such as LDA and LiNHt-
Bu, indicating that there are virtually no steric effects to
inhibit fluoro displacement (entries 7 and 9). LDA which is
commonly used as a strong base of scarce nucleophilicity
due to steric congestion reacted with lithium benzoate 1 to
afford the aminated product 9 in appreciable amount.15 In
an attempt to introduce an ortho-NH2 unit, 1 was treated
with a THF solution of LiNH2 (3.5 equiv) (entry 8).
However, the amidation product 11 was the only isolable
product from this reaction. LiNHt-Bu also led to 11 by rapid
degradation of 12 during acidic workup.
In view of the efficiency of lithioamides in this reaction
and the unlikelihood of their ability to proceed by electron
transfer (ET) mechanisms, this reaction presumably proceeds
through an addition-elimination sequence.16,17
The closely related lithium 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidide
(LTMP) exhibited a totally different behavior when exposed
to 1 (entry 10 and Scheme 1). LTMP metalated the position
adjacent to fluorine affording dianion 14 which partly
Conventional wisdom indicates that the nucleophilic
aromatic substitution (SNAr) reaction of benzoic acids
requires steps of protection and deprotection of the carbonyl
which acts as an essential carbon anchor group for subsequent
chemical transformations. Although there have been numbers
of reports using aryloxazolines7 and 2,6-dialkylphenyl aryl-
carboxylates8 to dictate the SNAr reaction course, these
methods have suffered from several limitations, the most
severe being most certainly the difficulty of removal of the
protecting carbonyl group. 2,6-Disubstituted benzamides and
benzoates are especially inert to hydrolysis except in cases
where anchimeric assistance by ortho-introduced electro-
philes is capable of forming five- or six-membered-ring
tetrahedral intermediates, which greatly enhances amide
hydrolytic rates.9,10 Therefore, there is still a need to explore
more efficient and concise methodologies.
While carrying out earlier work involving the coupling
reactions of alkyllithium with unprotected fluoro-substituted
benzoic acids,11 we became aware that surprisingly only very
few studies investigated the fluoro displacement reaction of
2-fluorobenzoic acid derivatives with lithioamides.12,13 Herein
we report that this process is general, affords anthranilic
acids, and does not require the use of a catalyst. It is also
shown that subjecting 2-methoxy benzoic acids to lithioa-
mides results in methoxide displacement.
(12) Two recent papers described LiHMDS-promoted coupling of
primary and N-substituted anilines with 2-fluorobenzoic acid (or amide) to
give N-arylanthranilic acids and N-arylanthranilamides: (a) Chen, M. H.;
Beylin, V. G.; Iakovleva, E.; Kesten, S. J.; Magano, J.; Vrieze, D. Synth.
Commun. 2002, 32, 411–417. (b) Davis, E. M.; Nanninga, T. N.; Tjiong,
H. I.; Winkle, D. D. Org. Process Res. DeV. 2005, 9, 843–846.
(13) Nucleophilic displacements of 2-fluorobenzoic acid derivatives are
well known to occur readily in the presence of strong electron-withdrawing
substituents (NO2, CF3, CN, Fx. .). See: Crampton, M. R. Organic Reaction
Mechanisms; A. C. Knipe, W. E. W., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: UK, 2004;
p 189.
(14) Lithium arylamides have weaker nucleophilic strengths than lithium
dialkylamines but are more stable at higher temperature (50-60 °C).
(15) The synthesis of anthranilic acids using sterically hindered
amines via a three-component coupling with arynes and CO2 has been
reported: Yoshida, H.; Morishita, T.; Ohshita, J. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3845–
3847.
(5) Note for guidance on specification limits for residues of metal
catalysts, 2002. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal
pdf (accessed April 21, 2010).
(16) Smith, M. B.; March, J. AdVanced Organic Chemistry, 6th ed.;
Wiley- Interscience: New York, 2007; pp 853-864, and references cited
therein. Addition of radical scavengers (tetraphenylhydrazine or 2-methyl-
2-nitrosopropane dimer) to a mixture of 1 and LiNEt2 gave only a slight
decrease of yield of the substitution product 3.
(17) Ifitisassumedthatthesereactionsproceedviaanaddition-elimination
sequence, then the σ complex B allows the carboxylate to orientate itself
in a coplanar fashion with the aromatic ring while Li+ forms a strong
complex with the fluoro/methoxy group and the carboxylate. For the
complex-induced proximity effect, CIPE, see: Whisler, M. N.; MacNeil,
S.; Snieckus, V.; Beak, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2206–2225.
The transition state leading to B may be envisioned as forming from A,
where the NR1R2 group enters from the side almost perpendicular to the
aromatic ring (to the π cloud). This is consistent with the lack of steric
inhibition to addition by large groups.
(6) See, for instance: (a) Prasad, K.; Repic, O.; Blacklock, T. J. Org.
Process Res. DeV. 2003, 7, 733–742. (b) Pink, C. J.; Wong, H. t.; Ferreira,
F. C.; Livingston, A. G. Org. Process Res. DeV. 2008, 12, 589–595.
(7) Gant, T. G.; Meyers, A. I. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 2297–2360.
(8) Hattori, T.; Satoh, T.; Miyano, S. Synthesis 1996, 514–518.
(9) Snieckus, V. Chem. ReV. 1990, 90, 879–933
.
(10) Deprotection of 2-aminated aryloxazolines requires acidic conditions
(3 M HCl, 12-24 h, reflux) which are not compatible with delicate
structures. Yields do not exceed 70%, and in many instances the deprotection
only leads to degradation products. See: Meyers, A. I.; Gabel, R. J. Org.
Chem. 1977, 42, 2653–2654
.
(11) The reaction of 2-fluorobenzoic acid with s-BuLi and t-BuLi affords
the the ipso-attack product arising out of substitution of the fluorine atom
by the alkyl group: (a) Gohier, F.; Castanet, A.-S.; Mortier, J. Org. Lett.
2003, 5, 1919–1922. Metalation reactions, recent references: (b) Nguyen,
T. H.; Castanet, A.-S.; Mortier, J. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 765–768. (c) Nguyen,
T. H.; Chau, N. T. T.; Castanet, A.-S.; Nguyen, K. P. P.; Mortier, J. J.
Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 3419–3429. (d) Tilly, D.; Fu, J.-m.; Zhao, B.-p.;
Alessi, M.; Castanet, A.-S.; Snieckus, V.; Mortier, J. Org. Lett. 2010, 12,
68–71.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 10, 2010
2407