In contrast, the influence of cyclisation on transport rates is
consistently positive, and can be very substantial. Thus, the
3a-acetoxy cholaphane 3 promotes chloride–nitrate exchange
18 times more effectively than the analogous cholapod 1. In
the case of the 3a-trifluoroacetamides 2 and 4 the cyclic
structure is 4 times more active, a smaller but significant
enhancement.
Notes and references
1 Chloride Movements Across Cellular Membranes, Advances in
Molecular and Cell Biology, ed. M. Pusch, Elsevier, San Diego,
2007, vol. 38; T. J. Jentsch, V. Stein, F. Weinreich and
A. A. Zdebik, Phys. Rev., 2002, 82, 503.
2 T. J. Jentsch, C. A. Hubner and J. C. Fuhrmann, Nat. Cell Biol.,
2004, 6, 1039; F. M. Ashcroft, Ion Channels and Disease, Academic
Press, London, 2000.
3 Reviews: A. P. Davis, D. N. Sheppard and B. D. Smith, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 2007, 36, 348; X. Li, Y. D. Wu and D. Yang, Acc. Chem.
Res., 2008, 41, 1428; J. Mareda and S. Matile, Chem.–Eur. J., 2009,
15, 28; G. W. Gokel and N. Barkey, New J. Chem., 2009, 33, 947;
Recent examples: P. V. Santacroce, J. T. Davis, M. E. Light,
P. A. Gale, J. C. Iglesias-Sanchez, P. Prados and R. Quesada,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 1886; B. A. McNally, E. J. O’Neil,
A. Nguyen and B. D. Smith, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 17274;
P. V. Jog and M. S. Gin, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 3693; I. Izzo,
S. Licen, N. Maulucci, G. Autore, S. Marzocco, P. Tecilla and
F. De Riccardis, Chem. Commun., 2008, 2986; J. T. Davis,
P. A. Gale, O. A. Okunola, P. Prados, J. C. Iglesias-Sanchez,
T. Torroba and R. Quesada, Nat. Chem., 2009, 1, 138.
The data imply that cyclisation to a cholaphane architecture
is a useful strategy for improving the transport properties of
cholapods. The effect does not seem to be related to chloride
binding affinities. Although the cholaphanes bind chloride
more strongly than the cholapods, the difference is very small.
Previous studies suggest that, when cholapods are closely
related, a 40-fold increase in binding power will result in a
roughly 10-fold increase in transport rates.4c On this basis, the
affinity increase observed here (factor of B1.5) should have a
minimal effect.
Two alternative explanations may be considered. Firstly,
the binding results suggest that cyclisation promotes selectivity
for chloride. For example, in the case of 2 and 4, chloride/
nitrate selectivities are 3 and 10 respectively. Results from our
earlier work on cationic cholaphanes point in the same
direction.6d Chloride/nitrate selectivity brings no advantage
(indeed, it could be counterproductive in our antiport system),
but other selectivities could be beneficial. In particular, selecti-
vity for chloride vs. phosphodiester monoanions could be
critical. It is possible that transport could be inhibited by the
binding of receptor molecules to lipid head-groups at the
surface of the membrane.12 Cholaphanes 3 and 4 might show
selectivity against the head-groups and might thus be less
affected than the corresponding cholapods.
4 (a) A. V. Koulov, T. N. Lambert, R. Shukla, M. Jain, J. M. Boon,
B. D. Smith, H. Y. Li, D. N. Sheppard, J. B. Joos, J. P. Clare and
A. P. Davis, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 4931;
(b) B. A. McNally, A. V. Koulov, B. D. Smith, J. B. Joos and
A. P. Davis, Chem. Commun., 2005, 1087; (c) B. A. McNally,
A. V. Koulov, T. N. Lambert, B. D. Smith, J. B. Joos, A. L. Sisson,
J. P. Clare, V. Sgarlata, L. W. Judd, G. Magro and A. P. Davis,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2008, 14, 9599.
5 A. P. Davis and J.-B. Joos, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2003, 240, 143;
A. P. Davis, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2006, 250, 2939.
6 The term ‘‘cholaphane’’ is used for macrocycles formed from bile
acid and aromatic units. See: (a) A. P. Davis, R. P. Bonar-Law and
J. K. M. Sanders, in Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry,
ed. Y. Murakami, Pergamon, Oxford, 1996, vol. 4 (Supramolecular
Reactivity and Transport: Bioorganic Systems), p. 257;
(b) E. Virtanen and E. Kolehmainen, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2004,
3385; (c) A. P. Davis, Molecules, 2007, 12, 2106. We have
previously described two anion-binding cholaphanes containing
quaternary ammonium groups; see: (d) A. L. Sisson, J. P. Clare
and A. P. Davis, Chem. Commun., 2005, 5263. Although these
systems showed interesting anion phase transfer properties, the
positive charge renders them unsuitable for membrane transport
(see discussion in ref. 4c).
Secondly, as originally hypothesised, the effect may relate to
anion desolvation. Although the cholapods bind anions very
strongly, their substrates remain relatively exposed to the
external environment. For example, modelling suggests that
a chloride ion bound to 2 can be solvated by at least 3 water
molecules. In contrast, a chloride ion bound to 4 is shielded
more effectively, with room for perhaps one water molecule to
access the anion (see Fig. 1). This difference may be significant
because bound water molecules can link to bulk water through
hydrogen bonding at the membrane interface. These bonds
may need to be broken before the complex can traverse the
membrane, and this may provide a barrier to transport.
Substrate encapsulation is a common feature of cation carriers
such as Valinomycin and Nonactin.13
7 V. del Amo, L. Siracusa, T. Markidis, B. Baragana,
K. M. Bhattarai, M. Galobardes, G. Naredo, M. N. Perez-Payan
´ ´
and A. P. Davis, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2004, 2, 3320.
8 (a) D. J. Cram and J. M. Cram, Science, 1974, 183, 803;
(b) A. J. Ayling, S. Broderick, J. P. Clare, A. P. Davis,
M. N. Pe
Chem.–Eur. J., 2002, 8, 2197; (c) J. P. Clare, A. J. Ayling, J. B. Joos,
A. L. Sisson, G. Magro, M. N. Perez-Payan, T. N. Lambert,
rez-Payan, M. Lahtinen, M. J. Nissinen and K. Rissanen,
´ ´
´
´
R. Shukla, B. D. Smith and A. P. Davis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005,
127, 10739.
9 A. J. Pope and R. A. Leigh, Planta, 1988, 176, 451.
10 F. Wissing and J. A. C. Smith, J. Membr. Biol., 2000, 177, 199.
11 As described in ref. 4a, the antiport mechanism has been
conclusively demonstrated for cholapod 1.
12 It has been shown that cholapods can carry phospholipid
head-groups through membrane interiors. This implies that the
cholapod-head-group interaction is significant, and could well
interfere with chloride transport. See: T. N. Lambert,
´ ´
J. M. Boon, B. D. Smith, M. N. Perez-Payan and A. P. Davis,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 5276.
13 B. T. Kilbourn, J. D. Dunitz, L. A. R. Pioda and W. Simon,
J. Mol. Biol., 1967, 30, 559; K. Neupert-Laves and M. Dobler,
Helv. Chim. Acta, 1975, 58, 432.
Although we cannot distinguish between these options
at present, the results suggest that the cyclic cholaphane
architecture is especially promising for transmembrane anion
transport. In future research we hope to prepare cholaphanes
with higher anion affinities, and the potential to set new
standards as anion carriers.
Financial support from the BBSRC (BBS/S/E/2006/13241),
and the EPSRC (EP/F03623X/1) is gratefully acknowledged.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 2227–2229 | 2229