C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
were obtained with HORROR.9 This sequence offered the advantage
of requiring only a moderate 3H rf-field amplitude (matched at half
the spinning frequency) so that a high 1H-decoupling rf-field (here
80 kHz) could be applied, keeping the total power reasonable on
two channels very close in frequency.
As shown in Figure 3, remarkably long dipolar oscillations are
observed for compound 1, allowing precise 3H-3H distance
measurement. From these oscillations, the interatomic distance was
extracted, accounting for the damped signal arising from the
simultaneous response of the 3H-3H spin pair and that of isolated
3H spins. For 1, the discrepancy between the measured and the
expected values is less than 1% (Table 1). Even for longer distances
such as those found in compounds 2 and 3, the accuracy remained
excellent, with a discrepancy in the range of 2%. To the best of
our knowledge, this constitutes unprecedented accuracy for such
long-range interatomic distances.
decoupling, which is more efficient than 1H-1H decoupling,
contributes to the precision of the method.12 Finally, this method
relies upon direct measurement of the dipolar oscillation, which is
more precise than using diffusion measurements.
3
Table 1. Predicted vs Measured H-3H Distances in Å for
Compounds 1-4
compound
1
2
3
4
predicted distancea 4.31
6.0
9.4
13.8
measured distance
4.35 ( 0.02 5.9 ( 0.1 9.3 ( 0.2 14.4 ( 2.2
a Distances predicted for molecules 1-4 using DFT relaxed
molecular structures with the PWSCF package.13
In summary, we have described a simple, sensitive, and accurate
approach for the determination of short- to long-range interatomic
distances using standard probe electronics and sample holders and
have successfully applied it to model compounds. The measured
distance of 14.4 ( 2.2 Å reported here is the highest ever obtained
using NMR. To generalize this approach to samples with a larger
3H chemical shift distribution or shorter T1F values, modifications
of the experimental conditions such as use of higher spinning
frequency, sample volume reduction, or design of new pulse
sequences would be beneficial.
This novel method will allow the study of drugs at their binding
sites in insoluble or membrane proteins. Application of this approach
to the study of biological questions such as the bioactive conforma-
tion of microtubule-bound paclitaxel is underway in our laboratories.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by an ANR grant
from the French Ministry of Research (Program MASTRIT NT05-
2_42116). Nathalie Thromat is warmly acknowledged for her help
in addressing safety issues.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details, spectro-
scopic data, and safety procedures. This material is available free of
References
(1) Griffin, R. G. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1998, 5, 508–512.
(2) Watts, A. Nat. ReV. Drug DiscoVery 2005, 4, 555–568.
(3) Watts, J. A.; Watts, A.; Middleton, D. A. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 43197–
43204.
(4) Balogh, E.; Wu, D.; Zhou, G.; Gochin, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
2821–2823.
(5) Paik, Y.; Yang, C.; Metaferia, B.; Tang, S.; Bane, S.; Ravindra, R.; Shanker,
N.; Alcaraz, A. A.; Johnson, S. A.; Schaefer, J.; O’Connor, R. D.; Cegelski,
L.; Snyder, J. P.; Kingston, D. G. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 361–
370.
(6) (a) O’Connell, T. M.; Gerig, J. T.; Williams, P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993,
115, 3048–3055. (b) Faucher, N.; Cintrat, J. C.; Berthault, P.; Rousseau,
B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 497–498.
(7) Valentine, A. M.; Wilkinson, B.; Liu, K. E.; Komar-Panicucci, S.; Priestley,
N. D.; Williams, P. G.; Morimoto, H.; Floss, H. G.; Lippard, S. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 1818–1827.
3
Figure 3. Variation of the H-signal intensity S(t) (in arbitrary units) for
compounds 1, 3, and 4 (from top to bottom) with the 3H rf-irradiation time
under HORROR conditions (here 4 kHz). The experimental data were fitted
using an advanced theoretical framework to perform the spin pair dynamics
simulations.10 Experimental details in Supporting Information.
(8) Faucher, N.; Ambroise, Y.; Cintrat, J. C.; Doris, E.; Pillon, F.; Rousseau,
B. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 932–934.
(9) Nielsen, N. C.; Bildsoe, H.; Jakobsen, H. J.; Levitt, M. H. J. Chem. Phys.
1994, 101, 1805–1812.
(10) Charpentier, T.; Fermon, C.; Virlet, J. J. Magn. Reson. 1998, 132, 181–
190.
(11) Bayro, M. J.; Huber, M.; Ramachandran, R.; Davenport, T. C.; Meier, B. H.;
Ernst, M.; Griffin, R. G. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 130, 114506.
(12) Brown, S. P.; Lesage, A.; Elena, B.; Emsley, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 13230–13231.
(13) The PwSCF code is implemented in the Quantum-ESPRESSO suite of
The case of compound 4 revealed that, even in the absence of
an observable dipolar oscillation, it was possible to extract a 14.4
Å distance with a precision of approximately (15%. Such results
were obtained due to high tritium dilution (less than 1 tritium for
every 1000 hydrogen atoms), avoiding problems associated with
the dipolar truncation effect.11 Furthermore, the use of 1H-3H
JA908915V
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 6, 2010 1735