Souto et al.
JOCArticle
The activation barriers for the cyclization of these deriva-
tives range from 16 to 20 kcal/mol. Since the imine was
expected to form through a rate-limiting step associated
with an energy barrier higher than 16 kcal/mol but competitive
with barriers of 19 kcal/mol, it is expected that, in this scenario,
mixtures of 2H-pyrans 3 and alkylidenepyridines 5 form.
In all cases the electrocyclic reactions are exergonic, as
expected from the energy released by the decumulation of the
allene bond. However, comparing the energy values of
Table 2 with those computed for the parent unsubstituted
system (i.e., methylidenepyridine 23, Figure 5, is stabilized by
40.6 kcal/mol relative to (2Z)-hexa-2,4,5-trienimine 20,
whereas methylidene-2H-pyran 22 is more stable than (2Z)-
hexa-2,4,5-trienal 19 by 22.1 kcal/mol), it is concluded that
the “allene effect”29 is partially compensated by the destabi-
lizing strain of the final products. The energy difference
between the isomeric alkylidene heterocycles ranges from
3.0 (3b) to 8.6 kcal/mol (3g) for the oxygen series and from
1.2 (40b) to 6.5 kcal/mol (40g) for the nitrogen series.
display features of pseudopericyclic processes that occur along
transition structures of π2 aromaticity (Figure 5).2 This inter-
pretation was questioned soon after,32 and the debate is still
ongoing.33-37
Our analysis focused on the consequences in the reactivity
of the presence of a cumulene and a heteroatom at the
interacting termini of the conjugated system, since the atoms
displayorbitals (in-planeπ-bondsandlone pairs, respectively)
that are orthogonal to the skeletal π-bonds. In the bond
forming/breaking process, the transition states contain a locus
or disconnection at which no electrons are exchanged between
the in-plane and the out-of-the-plane sets of orbitals. Lemal38
coined in 1976 the term pseudopericyclic to describe “con-
certed transformation whose primary changes in bonding
compass a cyclic array of atoms at one (or more) of which
non-bonding and bonding atomic orbitals interchange roles”
and predicted as a corollary that pseudopericyclic reactions
should be orbital symmetry allowed regardless of the number
of participating electrons.38 The existence of other processes
that could enjoy the energetic benefit of the pseudopericyclic
topology39 remained somewhat of a curiosity for almost
20 years. Birney demonstrated in comprehensive studies
the pseudopericyclic character of a number of transforma-
tions of conjugated molecules with orbital disconnections
at both termini including cycloadditions, cheletropic reac-
tions, sigmatropic rearrangements, and electrocyclizations.40
Studies of other systems including analogues with a single
disconnection soon followed41a-c,2 and altogether confirmed
that pseudopericyclic reactions (1) do not formally follow the
Woodward-Hoffmann rules, (2) proceed via planar or al-
most planar transition states, and (3) in most cases have
surprisingly low activation energies.40
Moreover, all the processes are torquoselective,3 leading
preferentially to the kinetic E-isomers of the alkylidene-2H-
pyran 3 and alkylidenepyridine 50. The pseudoboat confor-
mation of the six-membered ring structure in the transition
state leading to the E isomer is such that substituents at C6
and C4 orient themselves to prevent steric contacts (note the
t-Bu at C4 pointing upward and the 10-methyl-propenyl at
C6 pointing downward in Figure 6). In this situation, the
interaction between the substituent at C6 and the forming
C
O bond defines the kinetically favored electrocyclic
3 3 3
ring-closing transition state. Further downhill in the reaction
coordinate, however, the ring structure flattens, and close
contact between the substituents at C4 and C6 dominates
and reverses the energetic balance between these isomers. The
latter interaction causes the kinetic (E)-alkylidene-2H-pyran to
be thermodynamically less stable than its Z isomer. Parallel
argumentation is also applicable to the torquoselectivity ob-
served in the alkylidenepyridine formation.
ꢀ
(33) Silva Lopez, C.; Nieto Faza, O.; Cossıo, F. P.; York, D. M.; de Lera,
A. R. Chem.-Eur. J. 2005, 11, 1734.
ꢀ
ꢀ
(34) (a) Matito, E.; Sola, M.; Duran, M.; Poater, J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005,
ꢀ
ꢀ
109, 7591. (b) Matito, E.; Poater, J.; Duran, M.; Sola, M. ChemPhysChem
2006, 7, 111.
Solvation effects were also taken into consideration when
computing the reaction profiles summarized in Table 2. The
polarizable continuum model (PCM)30 was employed with
benzene parameters and the molecular cavity created with
the UAKS radii set.31 Solvation effects were found to be
small and very systematic along the reaction mechanisms,
and they do not modify the overall energy profile. We
therefore decided to omit this data for the sake of simplicity.
Characterization of the Electrocyclic Reactions. We have
previously discussed the main features of the electrocyclic
reaction of (2Z)-hexa-2,4,5-trienal (19) and (2Z)-hexa-2,4,5-
trienimine (20) using geometric, energetic, and aromaticity
criteria. DFT computations, including NBO analysis for
products and transition structures and aromaticity of the
latter,2b,c allowed the conclusion that these heterocyclizations
(35) (a) Chamorro, E. E.; Notario, R. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 4099.
(b) Chamorro, E. E.; Notario, R. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 7594.
(36) Duncan, J. A.; Calkins, D. E. G.; Chavarha, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 6740.
(37) Sakai, S. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2008, 120, 177.
(38) (a) Ross, J. A.; Seiders, R. P.; Lemal, D. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976,
98, 4325. (b) Bushweller, C. H.; Ross, J. A.; Lemal, D. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1977, 99, 629.
(39) Mention of pseudopericyclic reactions can be found, in addition to
refs 35, 37, and 38, in the following: (a) Burke, L. A.; Elguero, J.; Leroy, G.;
Sana, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 1685. (b) Henriksen, U.; Snyder, J. P.;
Halgren, T. A. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 3767. (c) Okamura, W. H.; Peter, R.;
Reischl, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 1034. (d) Elnagar, H.; Okamura, W. H.
J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 3060. (e) Wentrup, C.; Netsch, K.-P. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1984, 23, 802. (f) Koch, R.; Wong, M. W.; Wentrup, C. J. Org. Chem.
1996, 61, 6809. (g) Bibas, H.; Koch, R.; Wentrup, C. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
2629.
(40) (a) Ham, S.; Birney, D. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 8113.
(b) Birney, D. M.; Wagenseller, P. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 6262.
(c) Birney, D. M. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 2557. (d) Wagenseller, P. E.; Birney,
D. M.; Roy, D. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2853. (e) Birney, D. M. J. Org. Chem.
1996, 61, 243. (f) Birney, D. M.; Ham, S.; Unruh, G. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1997, 119, 4509. (g) Birney, D. M.; Xu, X. L.; Ham, S.; Huang, X. M. J.
(29) (a) Bond, D. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 661. (b) Jensen, F. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1995, 117, 7487.
ꢀ
(30) (a) Tomasi, J.; Persico, M. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 2027. (b) Mineva, T.;
Russo, N.; Sicilia, E. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 290. (c) Cossi, M.; Scalmani,
G.; Rega, N.; Barone, V. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 43. (d) Tomasi, J.;
Mennucci, B.; Cammi, R. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2999.
(31) Takano, Y.; Houk, K. N. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2005, 1, 70.
(32) (a) Rodrıguez-Otero, J.; Cabaleiro-Lago, E. M. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2002, 41, 1147. (b) Rodrıguez-Otero, J.; Cabaleiro-Lago, E. M. Chem.-
Eur. J. 2003, 9, 1837. (c) Cabaleiro-Lago, E. M.; Rodrıguez-Otero, J.;
J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7114. (h) Quideau, S.; Looney, M. A.; Pouysegu, L.;
Ham, S.; Birney, D. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 615. (i) Birney, D. M.; Xu,
X. L.; Ham, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 189. (j) Shunway, W.; Ham,
S.; Moer, J.; Whittlesey, B. R.; Birney, D. M. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 7731.
(k) Birney, D. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10917. (l) Bartsch, R. A.;
Chae, Y. M.; Ham, S.; Birney, D. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7479.
(m) Zhou, C.; Birney, D. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5231. (n) Birney,
D. M. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 851. (o) Wei, H.-X.; Zhou, C.; White, J. M.; Birney,
D. M. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4289. (p) Ji, H.; Xu, X.; Ham, S.; Hammad, L. A.;
Birney, D. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 528.
ꢀ
~
ꢀ
Garcıa-Lopez, R. M.; Pena-Gallego, A.; Hermida-Ramon, J. M. Chem.-
Eur. J. 2005, 11, 5966.
4460 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 75, No. 13, 2010