ˇ
ˇ
J. Tauchman, P. Štepnicka / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 13 (2010) 149–152
151
and is a part of long-term research projects supported by the Min-
istry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (Project
Nos. MSM 0021620857 and LC 06070).
(a)
(b)
References
[1] (a) N. Metzler-Nolte, M. Salmain, The bioorganometallic chemistry of
ˇ
ˇ
ferrocene, in: P. Štepnicka (Ed.), Ferrocenes: Ligands, Materials and
Biomolecules, Wiley, Chichester, 2008, pp. 499–639 (Chapter 13);
(b) T. Moriuchi, T. Hirao, Top. Organomet. Chem. 17 (2006) 143;
(c) H.-B. Kraatz, J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 15 (2005) 83;
(d) D.R. van Staveren, N. Metzler-Nolte, Chem. Rev. 104 (2004) 5931;
(e) T. Moriuchi, T. Hirao, Chem. Soc. Rev. 33 (2004) 294.
[2] H.-J. Lorkowski, P. Kieselack, Chem. Ber. 99 (1966) 3619.
[3] A.S. Georgopoulou, D.M.P. Mingos, A.J.P. White, D.J. Williams, B.R. Horrocks, A.
Houlton, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. (2000) 2969.
Fig. 2. Projections of the molecule of 1 along (a) the C1–C6 vector, and (b) the C13–
N bond (for atom labelling, see Fig. 1).
[4] H. Plenio, J. Yang, R. Diodone, J. Heinze, Inorg. Chem. 33 (1994) 4098.
[5] C.M. N’Diaye, L.A. Maciejewski, J.S. Brocard, C. Biot, Tetrahedron Lett. 42 (2001)
7221.
[6] K. Osakada, T. Sakano, M. Horie, Y. Suzaki, Coord. Chem. Rev. 250 (2006) 1012.
and references cited therein.
[7] Synthesis of
a ferrocenophane-based c-amino acid has been recently
communicated by Erker and coworkers: L. Tebben, K. Bussmann, M.
Hegemann, G. Kehr, R. Fröhlich, G. Erker, Organometallics 27 (2008) 4269.
[8] A solution of [RuCl2(PPh3)3] (27 mg, 0.03 mmol, 3.5 mol.%) in dry 1-methyl-2-
pyrrolidone (1.5 mL) was added to solid 1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ferrocene
(200 mg, 0.81 mmol) and [H3NCH2CO2Me]Cl (110 mg, 0.88 mmol). After
stirring at room temperature under Ar atmosphere for 5 min, triethylamine
(0.2 mL, 1.76 mmol) was introduced and the mixture was heated at 170 °C in
the dark for 24 h. Then, the volatiles were removed under vacuum and the dark
residue was extracted with ethyl acetate. Some insoluble by-products were
separated by filtration and the extract was purified by column
chromatography (silica gel, hexane:ethyl acetate, 5:1 v/v). The second band
was collected and evaporated to afford analytically pure 1 as a yellow solid
(24 mg, 10%). The first minor band contains mostly 2-oxa[3]ferrocenophane
according to NMR spectra [9].
[9] M.A. Carroll, A.J.P. White, D.A. Widdowson, D.J. Williams, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 (2000) 1551.
[10] V.K. Aggarwal, D. Jones, M.L. Turner, H. Adams, J. Organomet. Chem. 524
(1996) 263.
[11] Glycine methyl ester is formed in situ from glycine methyl ester hydrochloride
and triethylamine.
Fig. 3. Cyclic voltammograms of
1 before (solid line) and after (dashed line)
addition of 5 equiv. of HCl (recorded in acetonitrile on Pt electrode, 100 mV sꢀ1 scan
rate).
[12] Analytical data for 1: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, SiMe4): d 3.10 (s, 4H, C5H4CH2),
3.66 (s, 2H, CH2CO2Me), 3.75 (s, 3H, OMe), 4.09 and 4.12 (2 ꢁ apparent t,
J0 ꢂ 1.8 Hz, 4H, C5H4). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 101 MHz, SiMe4):
d 51.20
(C5H4CH2), 51.42 (OMe), 58.77 (CH2CO2Me), 69.27 and 69.95 (CH of C5H4);
83.15 (Cipso of C5H4), 171.65 (CO2Me). IR (Nujol): mCH 3101 w, 3094 w, 3080 m;
and using the known synthetic protocol. Although validated only
for glycine, this method most likely represents a general approach
to structurally unique amino acid derivatives that contain the re-
dox-active ferrocene moiety.
mC@O 1739 vs; 1299 m, 1287 w, 1229 w, 1197 vs, 1174 vs, 1144 vs, 1113 m,
1039 s, 1026 s, 996 s, 931 m, 854 s, 849 s, 819 w, 812 w, 801 s, 773 s, 688 m,
569 m, 540 m, 510 vs cmꢀ1. ESI + MS: m/z 300 ([M + H]+), 322 ([M + Na]+).
Anal. Calc. for C15H17FeNO2: C, 60.22; H, 5.73; N, 4.68%. Found: C, 60.00; H,
5.61; N, 4.57%.
Ferrocenophane 1, was characterised by a combination of com-
bustion analysis and common spectroscopic methods, and its for-
mulation was corroborated by X-ray crystallography. Cyclic
voltammetry measurements have shown the compound to under-
go one-electron reversible electron oxidation, presumably at the
ferrocene moiety. Upon protonation, this oxidation expectedly be-
comes more difficult, which is reflected by a shift of the associated
redox wave towards more positive potentials. In the case of the re-
lated N-methyl derivative (IV, R = Me), a shift +380 mV was noted
for the ferrocene/ferrocenium wave upon protonation with H[BF4]
in the same solvent [4].
[13] Orange prism from hot heptane (0.05 ꢁ 0.25 ꢁ 0.25 mm3). The diffraction data
were collected with a Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer (Mo K
a radiation,
k = 0.71073 Å; hmax = 27.5°) at 150(2) K. Crystallographic data: C15H17FeNO2,
M = 299.15 g molꢀ1, orthorhombic, space group Pccn (no. 56), a = 12.1391(2) Å,
b = 20.8244(3) Å, c = 10.4905(3) Å; V = 2651.9(1) Å3, Z = 8, Total 36709
diffractions of which 3041 were unique (Rint = 4.6%) and 2598 observed
according to Io > 2r(Io) criterion. The structure was solved by direct methods
(SIR97 [14]) and refined on F2 (SHELXL-97 [15]). All non-hydrogen atoms were
refined with anisotropic displacement parameters; the hydrogens were
included in their calculated positions. Refinement parameters: R (observed
diffractions) = 2.93%,
R (all data) = 3.72%, wR (all data) = 7.35%, residual
electron density: 0.38, ꢀ0.37 e Åꢀ3
.
[14] A. Altomare, M.C. Burla, M. Camalli, G.L. Cascarano, C. Giacovazzo, A.
Guagliardi, A.G.G. Moliterni, G. Polidori, R. Spagna, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 32
(1999) 115.
[15] G.M. Sheldrick,
SHELXL97, Program for Crystal Structure Refinement from
Supplementary material
Diffraction Data, University of Göttingen, Germany, 1997.
[16] Atoms defining the {C13, C14, O1, O2, C15} plane are coplanar within 0.01 Å.
[17] Unchanged 1 was recovered after reacting with an excess of MeI in acetonitrile
overnight (5 mg (17
solvent).
[18] Compound 1 (5 mg, 17
CCDC 746701 contains the supplementary crystallographic data
for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The
lmol) of 1 and 14 mg (0.1 mmol) of MeI in 1 mL of dry
l
mol) and 2,4,6-trinitrophenol (Hpic; 4.5 mg, 20 mol)
l
were dissolved in ethyl acetate (1 mL). The mixture was layered with hexane
(2 mL) and allowed to crystallise at room temperature. The separated deep red
crystalline picrate 2 was filtered off, washed with pentane and dried under
vacuum. The yield was not determined.
[19] M.p. 170–172 °C (ethyl acetate–hexane). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, SiMe4): d
3.85 (s, 3H, OMe), 4.01 (br s, 4H, C5H4CH2 or C5H4), 4.21 (s, 2H, CH2CO2Me),
4.28 (br apparent t, J0 ꢂ 1.8 Hz, 4H, C5H4), 4.45 (br s, 4H, C5H4CH2 or C5H4), 8.94
(s, 2H, OC6H2(NO2)3). ESI MS (methanol): m/z 300 ([1 + H]+), 322 ([1 + Na]+);
228 (picꢀ), 479 ([(pic)2Na]ꢀ), 730 ([(pic)3Na2]ꢀ). IR (neat; diffuse reflectance):
Acknowledgements
ˇ
The authors are grateful to Dr. I. Císarová for recording the X-
ray diffraction data. This work was financially supported by the
Grant Agency of Charles University in Prague (Project No. 58009)
m
3115 w, 3096 w, 3085 m, 3078 w, 3007 m, 2995 w, 2970 w, 2947 m, ca.