S. M. Ronkin et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 2828–2831
2831
H2N
Ar
Ar
O
OBn
O
OBn
O
OBn
O
O
N
S
S
N
S
N
Ar
a, b, c
N
Cl
N
d
N
HO
S
N
N
( )n
( )n
N
HN
N
N
HN
N
( )n
a, b
c, d
16a: n = 0
18
17
O
N
16b: n = 1
NH
NH
O
N
S
SnBu3
O
O
O
O
Br
N
R1
O
OBn
N
g
e, f
O
HN
N
+
S
OBn
R1 = methyl 4a, 4f
= 2-butyne 4c-e
= 2 propyne 4b
N
8, 14
21
NH
N
Br
O
Br
( )n
( )n
20
19
Scheme 4. Reagents and conditions: (a) tert-butyl prop-2-ynylcarbamate, n-
butyllithium, THF, À15 °C to À10 °C; (b) hydrazine hydrate, ethanol; (c) TFA,
CH2Cl2; (d) but-2-yn-1-ol (4c–e), 1,1-carbonyldiimidazole, THF.
N
S
N
h, i
H
N
N
potent enzyme and moderate antibacterial activity. They possess
activity against S. aureus and S. pneumoniae, but appear to be ac-
tively effluxed from E. coli based on E.coli tol C mutant activity ver-
sus E. coli wild type activity. Perhaps the most interesting
observation to arise from this study is the ability of the carbamate
analogs to act as selective inhibitors of E. coli GyrB over S. aureus
GyrB. Structural studies explain this selectivity by defining the dif-
ferences of the binding site created by Ile-51, Leu-103, and Ile-175
in S. aureus GyrB compared to E. coli where the isoleucines are va-
lines and Leu-103 is a methionine.
HN
( )n
N
H
O
3d-f
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: (a) isobutyl chloroformate, TEA, ethyl acetate,
0 °C to rt; (b) CH2N2/Et2O, ethyl acetate; (c) 6 N HCl, ethyl acetate; (d) thiourea,
ethanol, reflux; (e) NBS, CH3CN, 0 °C; (f) isoamyl nitrite, CuBr2, PEG 200, CH3CN; (g)
3-(1,3,2-dioxborinan-2-yl)pyridine, 2 N aq NaHCO3, Pd(PPh3)4, DME, reflux; (h)
(Ph3P)2PdCl2, dioxane, reflux; (i) BBr3, TFA, CH2Cl2, 0 °C.
The synthesis of the 2-piperidine and 2-pyrrolidine analogs
(Scheme 3) started with commercially available CBZ-protected 2-
carboxylic acid 16, which was activated by making the mixed
anhydride. This was subjected to reaction with diazomethane, fol-
lowed by treatment with 6 N HCl to afford chloromethyl ketone 17.
Condensation of 17 with thiourea afforded the desired 2-aminothi-
azole 18, which was brominated at the 5-position on the thiazole
ring with N-bromosuccinamide. The dibromo compound 19 was
synthesized by aniline diazotization followed by treatment with
copper bromide, using PEG 200 to maintain solubility. Suzuki cou-
pling with 3-(1,3,2-dioxborinan-2-yl)pyridine proceeded selec-
tively at the 2-position of thiazole 20, and subsequent Stille
coupling with the desired pyrazole stannane11 afforded com-
pounds 3d–f.
The synthesis of the carbamate compounds in Table 4 started
with alkynylation of the Weinreb amides (8, 14) (Scheme 4). The
amide was displaced by the dianion of BOC-propargyl amine. Sub-
sequent treatment with hydrazine hydrate afforded pyrazole 21.
The BOC protecting group was cleaved with TFA, and the resulting
amine was converted to the desired carbamates 4a–f, by treatment
with the desired alcohol in the presence of CDI.12
References and notes
1. Barrett, C. T.; Barrett, J. F. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2003, 14, 621.
2. Wolfson, J. S.; Hooper, D. C. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1985, 28, 581.
3. Ho, P-L.; Que, T.-L.; Tsang, D. N.-C.; Ng, T.-K.; Chow, K.-H.; Seto, W.-H.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1999, 43, 1310.
4. Drlica, K.; Malik, M.; Kerns, R. J.; Zhao, X. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008,
52, 385.
5. Lewis, I. J.; Singh, O. M. P.; Smith, C. V.; Skarzynski, T.; Maxwell, A.; Wonacott,
A. J.; Wigley, D. B. EMBO J. 1996, 15, 1412.
6. Hull, K.; Green, O.; Sing, A.; Bist, S.; Demeritt, J.; Loch, J.; Mulled, G.; Hauk, S.;
Sherer, B.; Ni, H.; Eakin, A.E. Presented at the 48th Interscience Conference on
Antimicrobial Agents, Washington D.C., October, 2008; Poster F1-2027.
7. Illingworth, R.N.; Uria-Nickelsen, M.; Bryant, J.; Eakin, A.E. Presented at the
48th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents, Washington D.C.,
October 2008; Poster F1-2028.
8. Charifson, P. S.; Grillot, A.-L.; Grossman, T. H.; Parsons, J. D.; Badia, M.; Bellon,
S.; Deininger, D. D.; Drumm, J. E.; Gross, C. H.; LeTiran, A.; Liao, Y.; Mani, N.;
Nicolau, D. P.; Perola, E.; Ronkin, S.; Shannon, D.; Swenson, L. L.; Tang, Q.;
Tessier, P. R.; Tian, S.-K.; Trudeau, M.; Wang, T.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, H.; Stamos, D. J.
Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 5243.
9. Holmquist, C. R.; Roskamp, E. J. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 3258.
10. Kerdesky, F. A. J.; Holms, J. H.; Moore, J. L.; Bell, R. L.; Dyer, R. D.; Carter, G. W.;
Brooks, D. W J. Med. Chem. 1991, 34, 2158–2165.
11. Sakamoto, T.; Shiga, F.; Uchiyama, D.; Kondo, Y.; Yamanaka, H. Heterocycles
1992, 33, 813–818.
12. For full experimental details on similar compounds see: US Patent 0024030 A1,
2005.
In conclusion, the pyrazolothiazole class evolved from a micro-
molar high throughput screen hit, to a class of GyrB inhibitors with
Table 4
Staphlococcus aureus, Escherichia coli enzyme activity and antibacterial activity (MIC).
O
R
N
S
N
H
OR1
NH
N
Ar
Ar
R
R1
Methyl
CH2C„CH
CH2C„CHCH3
CH2C„CHCH3
CH2C„CHCH3
Methyl
S. aureus Ki(
lM)
E. coli Ki(
lM)
MIC (lg/mL) E. coli tol C
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
4f
3-Pyridyl
3-Pyridyl
3-Pyridyl
3-Pyridyl
3-Pyridyl
Phenyl
1-Piperidine
1-Piperidine
1-Piperidine
Methoxymethyl
Cyclohexyl
0.300
0.240
0.140
1.10
0.056
0.011
<0.004
0.014
<0.004
1.08
>64
1.0
0.5
8.0
>64
>64
0.069
4-Hydroxy-1-piperidine
NDa
a
Not tested for S. aureus activity