Scheme 1
Scheme 3
type has not been previously reported to our knowledge. Only
two references have cited the attack of silyl enol ethers on
cyclopropane-1,1-diesters, but in both cases the reactions
were intermolecular.7 Therefore, we decided to test the
viability of this idea using a model system.
of the system, the ketone 15 was subjected to standard Wittig
methenylation conditions to give the 1,1-disubstituted olefin 17
in 73% yield. Treatment of 17 with a catalytic amount (20 mol
%) of Sc(OTf)3 gave the desired hydrindanone product 18 in
71% yield as a single regioisomer. To our knowledge, this is
the first example of an intramolecular attack of a silyl enol ether
on a cyclopropane-1,1-diester resulting in a new carbon-carbon
bond to give an annulated product.
Scheme 2
Encouraged by the results in the model system, we decided
to demonstrate the utility of this method in a formal total
synthesis of (+)-fawcettimine. Since only one regioisomer
was obtained, we could safely rule out any “SN2′-like” or
“SN1′-like” reaction mechanisms. Previous work9 done in
this area on intermolecular cyclopropane-1,1-diester ring
openings allowed us to postulate that the key ring-opening
reaction occurred via a stereospecific SN2-like mechanism
as shown in Figure 2. Thus, Lewis acid complexation of one
(or both) of the two esters of A would be followed by attack
of the silyl enol ether on the activated allylic cyclopropyl-
1,1-diester B without any loss of stereocontrol to give
stereospecifically C. To test this hypothesis, we decided to
synthesize one diastereomer of the substrate and see if there
were any loss of stereochemistry in the cyclized product.
After a simple molecular model analysis, it was determined
that the previously unreported (S)-methyl ketone 23 was
Thus, the known methyl ketone 128 was converted to the
kinetic (and thermodynamic) TBS silyl enol ether 13 by
treatment with TBSOTf and Hu¨nig’s base (Scheme 3).
Triflimide-mediated Mukaiyama-Michael addition4 of 13
to 2-methylcyclohexenone 14 gave the ketone 15 as a mixture
of diastereomers. Warming the reaction mixture did not
afford the cyclopropane ring-opened product but instead gave
the silyl enol ether hydrolysis product 16. Various fluoride
reagents and Lewis acids were screened, but none of the
conditions gave the annulated product and, in most cases,
gave only the product of hydrolysis. To increase the reactivity
(6) For selected examples see: (a) Jackson, S. K.; Karadeolian, A.;
Driega, A. B.; Kerr, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 4196–4201. (b)
Carson, C. A.; Kerr, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 8242–8244. (c) Young,
I. S.; Kerr, M. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3023–3026. (d) Pohlhaus,
P. D.; Johnson, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16014–16015. (e)
Korotkov, V. S.; Larionov, O. V.; Hofmeister, A.; Magull, J.; de Meijere,
A. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 7504–7510. (f) Pohlhaus, P. D.; Sanders, S. D.;
Parsons, A. T.; Li, W.; Johnson, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 8642–
8650. (g) Perreault, C.; Goudreau, S. R.; Zimmer, L. E.; Charette, A. B.
Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 689–692. (h) Ivanova, O. A.; Budynina, E. M.; Grishin,
Y. K.; Trushkov, I. V.; Verteletskii, P. V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008,
47, 1107–1110. (i) Lebold, T. P.; Kerr, M. A. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4354–
4357.
(7) (a) Fang, J.; Ren, J.; Wang, Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 6659–
6662. (b) Qu, J.-P.; Deng, C.; Zhou, J.; Sun, X.-L.; Tang, Y. J. Org. Chem.
2009, 74, 7684–7689.
Figure 2
(8) Le Menn, J.-C.; Tallec, A.; Sarrazin, J. Can. J. Chem. 1991, 69,
761–767.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 13, 2010
2963