Y. He et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 13 (2010) 314–318
317
Fig. 10. Anaerobic and aerobic pBR322 DNA cleavage at room temperature for 3 h
incubation. Lanes 1–3 aerobic conditions. Lanes 4–6: anaerobic conditions. Lanes
1and 4: DNA + ddH2O; lanes 2 and 5: DNA + DMF and lanes 3 and 6: DNA + 1
(100 lM).
plex through adding hydroxyl radical scavengers (5 mM DMSO)
and singlet oxygen scavenger (5 mM NaN3) in the system [20].
As shown in Fig. 9, the cleavage efficiency is not found in the pres-
ence of the scavengers, which suggest that the cleavage reaction
mediated by the complex may be caused by singlet oxygen or hy-
droxyl radical in the solution. Furthermore, the DNA cleavage
experiments of the complex in argon were carried out. Under
anaerobic conditions, no DNA degradation was observed over a
period of 3 h at room temperature, which can be seen in Fig. 10.
The result of no DNA cleavage activity in the absence of oxygen
demonstrates that oxidative cleavage occurred in this system.
In summary, we prepared and structurally characterized a new
unsymmetrical bis-furan pendant-armed macrocyclic heterodinu-
clear Cu(II)Zn(II) complex. The complex is partially intercalated
into DNA base-pairs with an unclassical intercalative mode and
exhibits efficient cleavage of supercoiled DNA (pBR 322DNA) in
the absence of any external agents via oxidative mechanism. The
DNA cleavage activity of the complex is proportional to incubation
time. The bind constant of the complex with DNA is much larger
than those of homodinuclear macrocyclic complexes.
Fig. 7. Effect of the complex on the relative viscosity of CT-DNA. [DNA] = 140 lM.
Acknowledgements
Fig. 8. Gel electrophoresis diagram showing the cleavage of pBR322 DNA at
different incubation time and the complex concentration at room temperature.
This work was supported by National Nature Science Founda-
tion of China (No. 20871097), the foundation for midlife and youth
Lanes 1–5, DNA + 1 for 5 h, 4 h, 3 h, 2 h, 1 h, respectively. (a) 50
100 M complex and (c) 200 M complex.
lM complex; (b)
l
l
excellent innovation group of Hubei Province, China (No.
T
200802), the Key Foundation of the Education Department of Hu-
bei Province, China (No. D20081503).
plex can transform the supercoiled (SC) to nicked circular (NC)
DNA forms, and the cleavage activity of the complex increased as
the enhancement of the incubation time, but was not obvious
concentration-dependent effect. Comparing the results with those
of [Cu(OP)2]2+ (OP = 1,10-phen-anthroline), the cleavage activity of
the complex was weaker than that of it [S1], which was one of the
best-characterized nucleolytic agents [26]. The known homonu-
clear complexes have DNA cleavage activities only in the presence
of H2O2 [9–11], however, the title complex has the activity without
H2O2, illustrating that the rigid furan groups in the macrocycle
ligand may have synergistic effect in the DNA cleavage.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
CCDC 665425 contains the supplementary crystallographic data
for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The
the cleavage of pBR322 DNA with 1 (100
(100 M) for 3 h incubation. Supplementary data associated with
l
M) and [Cu(OP)2]2+
l
this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/
Although the cleavage reaction promoted by the complex does
not require additional external agents, we carefully investigated
the effects of scavengers on the DNA cleavage ability of the com-
References
[1] K.J. Humphreys, K.D. Karlin, Rokita, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (2002) 6009–6019.
[2] K. Yamaguchi, S. Fujinami, M. Suzuki, M. Shionoya, Chem. Commun. (2001)
375–376.
[3] J.L. Tian, L. Feng, W. Gu, S.P. Yan, D.Z. Liao, J. Inorg. Biochem. 101 (2007) 196–
202.
[4] M.A. Jakupec, M. Galanski, C.G. Hartinger, B.K. Keppler, Dalton Trans. (2008)
183–194.
[5] L. Ronconi, P.J. Sadler, Coord. Chem. Rev. 251 (2007) 1633–1648.
[6] P.J. Dyson, G. Sava, Dalton Trans. (2006) 1929–1933.
[7] C.J. Burrows, J.G. Muller, Chem. Rev. 98 (1998) 1109–1951.
[8] C.J. Burrows, S.E. Rokita, Acc. Chem. Res. 27 (1994) 295–301.
[9] J. Qian, W. Gu, H. Liu, L. Feng, S.P. Yan, D.Z. Liao, Dalton Trans. (2007) 1060–
1066.
[10] N. Sengottuvelan, D. Saravanakumar, M. Kandaswamy, Polyhedron 26 (2007)
3825–3832.
[11] D.Y. Kong, J.G. Mao, A. Clearfield, A.E. Martell, Inorg. Chim. Acta 342 (2003) 58–
170.
Fig. 9. Effect of radical scavengers on the reaction of DNA with 1 (100
incubation. Lane 1: DNA + ddH2O; lane 2: DNA + DMF; lane 3: DNA + NaN3 (5 mM);
lane 4: DNA + NaN3 (5 mM) + 1 (100 M); lane 5: DNA + DMSO (5 mM); lane 6:
DNA + DMSO (5 mM) + 1 (100 M) and lane 7, DNA + 1 (100 M).
lM) for 3 h
l
l
l
[12] B. Zeybek, B.M. Ates, F. Erean, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 98 (2009) 377–388.