N. A. Powell et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 4441–4444
4443
potentially increase the rate of the desired C–C bond-forming
reductive elimination event and decrease the rate of the proteo-
reductive elimination event. Toward this end, we were encouraged
by the reports of Buchwald and co-workers on the use of electron-
PCy2
PCy2
PtBu2
rich phosphine ligands in intermolecular a
-arylations of ketones.9
11
JohnPhos
12
Screening of several (Fig. 2) phosphine ligands 11–15 (entries n–r)
with Pd(OAc)2 and K3PO4 in toluene identified X-Phos 13 as the
most successful ligand, yielding 9 in 84% yield with no detectable
amount of the des-bromo by-product 10 (entry p). We believe that
the success of the X-Phos 13 ligand is due to the highly sterically
encumbered environment about the P atom, which significantly
enhances the rate of the desired C–C bond reductive elimination
event. The reaction conditions of X-Phos 13/Pd(OAc)2 and K3PO4
in toluene met our goal to identify more tractable reaction condi-
tions for the conversion of 8 to 9, and have proven to be scalable
to >100 g scale. These conditions provided 9 as a racemic mixture
of a single diastereomer. We were interested in developing an
enantioselective version on this cyclization. However, initial efforts
13
X-Phos
PPh2
PPh2
O
PCy2
PCy2
14
Xantphos
15
rac-BINAP
Figure 2. Phosphine ligands used in optimization studies.
toward an enantioselective a-arylation of 8 were not successful, as
the use of rac-BINAP 15 as a ligand resulted in no reaction (entry r).
This precluded us from examining the separate BINAP enantio-
mers. However, it is possible that other chiral phosphine ligands
may promote the cyclization of 8 in an enantioselective fashion.
Once optimal, reproducible, and scalable reaction conditions
were identified, we examined the scope of these conditions with a
variety of 2-(2-halobenzyl)-cyclohexanones (Table 3). Electron-rich
substrates such as 16a underwent facile cyclization to yield 17a in
60% yield. Aryl chlorides were also useful cyclization substrates, as
16b and 16c afforded the corresponding cyclic products 17b and
17c in 61% and 84% yields, respectively. Heterocyclic chlorides were
also tolerated, although the cyclization of 16d led to product 17d in a
reduced26%yield. Variationwasalsotoleratedinthecyclohexanone
portion, as the 4-oxo-cyclohexanone substrates 16e and 16f under-
went cyclization to afford 17e and 17f in >98% yields. The 2,2-disub-
stituted cyclohexanone 16g also underwent cyclization to yield 17g
in good yield. Substrates such as 17g may also be useful to access
enantiomerically pure tricyclo-[7.3.1.02,7]-trideca-2,4,6-trien-13-
ones if the quaternary center in 16g can be prepared in an enantiose-
lectivefashion. Alternatively, thecarboxylatefunctionalgroupcould
be derivatized as a suitable chiral auxiliary that might provide suffi-
cient enolate facial selectivity.
Table 3
Scope of the intramolecular ketone
a
-arylation of 2-(2-halobenzyl)-cyclohexanones
Pd(OAc)2 (10 mole%)
X-Phos (20 mole%)
Z
Y
X
Z
Y
O
R
K3PO4, PhCH3, 100 °C
R
16
O
17
Entry
Substrate
Product
Yield (%)
60
Br
O
a
b
c
d
e
f
MeO
MeO
O
Cl
O
61
84
F3C
F
F3C
F
O
Cl
O
O
O
N
Cl
N
O
2. General bench-scale synthetic procedure for the
intramolecular a-arylation of 2-(2-halobenzyl)-cyclohexanones
using Pd(OAc)2/X-Phos
26
O
Br
O
O
O
O
O
98
2.1. Synthesis of 5-fluoro-tricyclo-[7.3.1.02,7]-trideca-2,4,6-
trien-13-one (9)
F
F
F
F
F
O
O
Br
Anoven-dried, 100 mL round-bottommedflaskwas cooledunder
Ar and charged with 140 mg (0.62 mmol) of Pd(OAc)2, 592 mg
(1.24 mmol) of X-Phos 13, and 3.03 g (14.3 mmol) of anhydrous
K3PO4. A solution of 1.77 g (6.21 mmol) of 2-(2-bromo-5-fluoroben-
zyl)-cyclohexanone 3 in 25 mL of anhydrous toluene was added, and
the resulting suspension was heated to reflux for 18 h. After cooling
to room temperature, the reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc,
filtered through Celite, and concentrated. Purification by flash col-
umn chromatography (SiO2, 100% hexanes then gradient to 10%
EtOAc/hexanes) gave 1.067 g (84%) of 4 as a clear viscous oil. 1H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 1.45–1.63 (m, 2H), 1.95–2.15 (m, 4H),
2.74–2.78 (m, 1H), 3.17 (d, J = 17.8 Hz, 1H), 3.43 (dd, J = 17.8,
7.2 Hz, 1H), 3.45–3.49 (m, 1H), 6.84–6.88 (m, 1H), 6.90–6.93 (m,
1H), 6.94 (dd, J = 12.0 Hz, 5.9 Hz, 1H); MS calcd for [C13H13FO+1]:
205.2. Found (APCI): 205.1 (M+1).
100
F
O
O
Br
g
74
F
EtO2C
F
CO2Et
Since proteo-reductive elimination to form the des-bromo
by-product 10 remained a significant issue, we investigated the
addition of sterically hindered electron-rich phosphine ligands to