tacene derivative with additional phenyl rings at the 5, 9,
14, and 18 positions.5 Miller and co-workers then demon-
strated that arylthio substituents can enhance photo-oxidative
resistance, and thus, arylthio derivatives of acenes (n ) 7,
9) were successfully synthesized and fully characterized.6 It
should be noted that a strategy of “center-to-edge” was used
both in Wudl’s and Miller’s work; i.e., the precursors were
constructed by a Diels-Alder reaction of a central dienophile
(or diene) with two edge diene (or dienophile) components.
Aside from reports by these three groups, no other derivatives
of higher acene were reported elsewhere, despite theoretical
calculations that predicted an array of interesting properties
for higher acenes.7
In parallel to these works, we have been working on
alternative approaches to prepare soluble and stable higher
acenes by using different synthetic methods and new
solubilizing and stabilizing substituents. Based on previous
studies on the higher acenes and also peri-fused oligoacenes
(e.g., bisanthene),8 we noticed that steric and electronic
effects were important factors in determining the photo-
oxidative stability and solubility of largely extended π-con-
jugated systems. (1) Steric effect: bulky substitution, such
as the triisopropylsilylethynyl groups, can prevent the
oxidative addition of singlet oxygen to the acene core.4,9
Meanwhile, the solubility can be also improved as a result
of diminished intermolecular interactions. (2) Electronic
effect: to form stable acene derivatives, HOMO levels need
to be reduced and thus electron-withdrawing groups should
be attached.10,11 Both trifluoromethylphenyl and the triiso-
propylsilylethynyl (TIPSE) groups are electron-withdrawing
groups and expected to enhance the stability of the electron-
rich acene core. Herein, we demonstrate that a new heptacene
derivative 1 bearing four trifluoromethylphenyl groups at the
5, 9, 14, and 18 positions and two TIPSE groups at the 7
and 16 positions (Scheme 1) was prepared by a new synthetic
approach, and it showed significant improvement in its
stability against photo-oxidation under different irradiation
conditions.
3-methoxyphthalide 3 quantitatively.13 Addition of 2 equiv
of 4-trifluoromethylphenyl Grignard reagent at 0 °C to a
solution of 3-methoxyphthalide 3 in THF, followed by acidic
workup,furnishedisobenzofuran4in56%yield.14 Diels-Alder
reaction between isobenzofuran 4 and dimethyl maleate gave
epoxide 5, which was subsequently treated with p-toluene-
sulfonic acid (TsOH) in refluxing toluene to remove one
molecule of water. The resulting dehydrated compound 6
was reduced by LiAlH4 to give (1,4-bis(4-(trifluoromethyl)-
phenyl)naphthalene-2,3-diyl)dimethanol 7. The Swern oxida-
tion of diol 7 did not give the expected dialdehyde, which
was planned to be used for the preparation of the heptacene
quinone 10 by base-mediated condensation with 1,4-cyclo-
hexanedione. Alternatively, only one alcohol was oxidized
into aldehyde, which then condensed with the neighboring
alcohol to give the compound 4,9-bis(4-(trifluoromethyl)phe-
nyl)-1,3-dihydronaphtho[2,3-c]furan-1-ol 8 in 55% yield.
Fortunately, this type of compound (e.g., 8) was established
as a convenient precursor for isonaphthofurans.15 Thus,
treatment of compound 8 with acetic acid produced the
isonaphthofuran intermediate, which then underwent a 2-fold
Diels-Alder reaction with benzoquinone to give the dual
cycloaddition product 9 in 90% yield. The resulting com-
pound 9 was then treated with TsOH in refluxed toluene with
a Dean-Stark apparatus to give the desired heptacene
quinone 10 in 50% yield.
Finally, nucleophilic addition of organometallic reagents
to the heptacene quinone 10 in toluene followed by reduction
of the as-formed diol 11 afforded the desired product. For
the formation of diol 11, use of TIPSE lithium reagent
prepared by lithiation of triisopropylsilyl acetylene (TIPSA)
with n-BuLi was not successful, probably due to side
reactions with the trifluoromethyl groups (-CF3). The
synthesis of diol 11 required the use of TIPSE Grignard
reagent prepared by treatment of TIPSA with i-PrMgCl
solution to minimize formation of side products, as previ-
ously reported by Ong et al.10b and Tykwinski et al.11
Interestingly, we found that low polar solvent was also
required, and only one TIPSE group was introduced if THF
was used instead of toluene as solvent for the preparation of
this diol 11. Diol 11 was then reduced using excess
SnCl2·2H2O in toluene to obtain our target compound 1 as a
yellow green solid.11 To further improve solubility, we also
attempted to replace TIPSE groups with a long alkynyl chain
such as -Ct CC12H25. It was found that the reduction of
the corresponding diol was not successful because steric
hindrance imposed by the alkyl chain (-C12H25) was not
sufficient to stabilize heptacene.
In our synthetic strategy shown in Scheme 1, a heptacene
quinone 10 was first prepared by an “edge-to-center”
approach, a method generally used in constructing pentacene
derivatives.12 The synthesis began with 2-carboxybenzalde-
hyde 2, which was refluxed in dry methanol to give
(5) Chun, D.; Cheng, Y.; Wudl, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47,
8380.
(6) (a) Kaur, I.; Stein, N. N.; Kopreski, R. P.; Miller, G. P. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2009, 131, 3424. (b) Kaur, I.; Jazdzyk, M. N.; Stein, N.; Prusevich,
P.; Miller, G. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1261.
(7) (a) Kivelson, S.; Chapman, O. L. Phys. ReV. B. 1983, 28, 7236. (b)
Bendikov, M.; Duong, H. M.; Starkey, K.; Houk, K. N.; Carter, E. A.;
Wudl, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 7416.
The heptacene derivative 1 was slightly soluble in
chloroform, dichloromethane, and tetrachloroethane. The
solubility could be improved in an aromatic solvent such as
(8) (a) Yao, J.; Wu, J.; Chi, C.; Loh, K. P. Chem.sEur. J. 2009, 15,
9299. (b) Zhang, K.; Huang, K.; Li, J.; Luo, J.; Chi, C.; Wu, J. Org. Lett.
2009, 11, 4854. (c) Li, J.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, X.; Huang, K.; Chi, C.; Wu,
J. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 856.
(9) Kaur, I.; Jia, W.; Kopreski, R. P.; Selvarasah, S.; Dokmeci, M. R.;
Pramanik, C.; McGruer, N. E.; Miller, G. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
(12) (a) Rainbolt, J. E.; Miller, G. P. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 3020. (b)
Martin, N.; Behnisch, R.; Hanack, M. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 2563. (c)
Ried, W.; Antho¨fer, F. Angew. Chem. 1954, 66, 604.
(13) Cresp, T. M.; Giles, R. G. F.; Sargent, M. V.; Brown, C.; Smith,
D. O’N. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1974, 2435.
(14) Benderradji, F.; Nechab, M.; Einhorn, C.; Einhorn, J. Synlett 2006,
13, 2035.
16274
.
(10) (a) Maliakal, A.; Raghavachari, K.; Katz, H.; Chandross, E.; Siegrist,
T. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 4980. (b) Li, Y.; Wu, Y.; Liu, P.; Prostran, Z.;
Gardner, S.; Ong, B. S. Chem. Mater. 2006, 19, 418. (c) Jiao, C.; Huang,
K.; Luo, J.; Zhang, K.; Chi, C.; Wu, J. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4508
.
(11) Lehnherr, D.; McDonald, R.; Tykwinski, R. R. Org. Lett. 2008,
(15) Smith, J. G.; Dibble, P. W.; Sandborn, R. E. J. Org. Chem. 1986,
51, 3762.
10, 4163
.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 15, 2010
3361